Unbelievable sculptures
 | Unbelievable sculptures |  |
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 2:58 pm |
|
|
| Jerry |
| lecturer |

|
| |
| Joined: 29 May 2006 |
| Posts: 2776 |
| Location: UK |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 8:35 pm |
|
|
| T_C |
| professor |

|
| |
| Joined: 30 Jan 2007 |
| Posts: 3458 |
| Location: London |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
They're ok, I wouldn't go as far as calling it art though...  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:41 pm |
|
|
| Jerry |
| lecturer |

|
| |
| Joined: 29 May 2006 |
| Posts: 2776 |
| Location: UK |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
| T_C wrote: |
They're ok, I wouldn't go as far as calling it art though...  |
David Lloyd thought they were OK too, he paid £11m for the collection. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:14 am |
|
|
| T_C |
| professor |

|
| |
| Joined: 30 Jan 2007 |
| Posts: 3458 |
| Location: London |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Sorry Jerry, I wasn't knocking your thread but the "art" itself. I can see the "wow" factor, but it is a load of rubbish when you really think about it. The microscopes you have to look through are more attractive than the sculptures themselves...and it's more of a 'hobby' than it is art imo...same with crazy TC Tracy Emin...her cum stained bed sold for £150,000 and it was the worse piece of art I have EVER seen!
Stuff like this is so uninspirational...  |
|
|
|
|
|
|