The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The war against Syria

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Re: The war against Syria

Postby miltiades » Tue Oct 25, 2016 7:42 pm

It is inconceivable , absurd, damn right stupid that the West is supporting islamists such as the Free Syrian Army who has as it's
manifesto's top priority in .....coming to power - FAT CHANCE - the introduction of sharia law!!


"“We want a regime that applies sharia law, but that is fair and just,” said Abu Mohammad, a Free Syrian Army commander in Aleppo and a member of the Muslim Brotherhood."

"One former member, Abu Osama, said he left the group after it tried to get him to sign an oath pledging to fight with the group anywhere in the world. Now fighting with the rebel Free Syrian Army, Abu said some fighters with Jabhat al-Nusra consider Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, an infidel because he has not enforced sharia “” strict Islamic law “” in Egypt."

WEST WAKE UP !!!
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby Paphitis » Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:05 am

miltiades wrote:It is inconceivable , absurd, damn right stupid that the West is supporting islamists such as the Free Syrian Army who has as it's
manifesto's top priority in .....coming to power - FAT CHANCE - the introduction of sharia law!!


"“We want a regime that applies sharia law, but that is fair and just,” said Abu Mohammad, a Free Syrian Army commander in Aleppo and a member of the Muslim Brotherhood."

"One former member, Abu Osama, said he left the group after it tried to get him to sign an oath pledging to fight with the group anywhere in the world. Now fighting with the rebel Free Syrian Army, Abu said some fighters with Jabhat al-Nusra consider Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, an infidel because he has not enforced sharia “” strict Islamic law “” in Egypt."

WEST WAKE UP !!!


The USA are offering support to a group known as Syrian Democratic Forces - a coalition of Syrian Rebel Groups which have been carefully vetted.

Applying Sharia Law is of no consequence to us and neither should it be for you. They have the right to apply any laws they like, as long as that is the democratic wish of the majority.

Syria has the Death penalty, and without due process. They even have summary executions.

http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies ... RP1_en.pdf
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby Paphitis » Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:24 am

Robin Hood wrote:
Paphitis wrote:Fact is, between the USA and Russia, Pootin would be the more likely to start a nuclear exchange.

He has a short fuse. A bit like small dog syndrome. plenty of bark just like a Poodle but in the end, just one good kick to the head and it's Poodle heaven for Pootin!


If your comments reflect the opinions of the US/NATO/Coalition countries ........ it will surely lead to their demise! :roll:

If they are given a reason by BATO forces action on their border with Europe, even an accidental situation, they will attack first ............ you would leave them no other option, because they know they are next, along with Iran, on NATO's menu supporting US hegemony! :x


look, everyone knows very well that Pootin's posturing is only to take advantage of the USA's lack of leadership.

Once that changes, we all know who will piss themselves and need an urgent panty change.

I dare Pootin play games with Hillary in office.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby Paphitis » Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:31 am

Robin Hood wrote:Now THIS really would make a difference to the US ‘First Strike’ policy ... what was it Clint Eastwood said “Go on punk ..... make my day!” Should make NATO think twice about making threats ? Maybe it is just propaganda ...... or maybe not? Fear not ..... Paphitis will bring it down with his super hypersonic ........... boomerang! :shock:

Russia unveils image of its terrifying Satan 2 missile: Super-nuke could destroy an area the size of FRANCE

The RS-28 Sarmat missile, dubbed Satan 2 by Nato, has a top speed of 4.3 miles (7km) per second and has been designed to outfox anti-missile shield systems.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3870192/Russia-unveils-image-terrifying-Satan-2-missile-Super-nuke-destroy-area-size-FRANCE.html#ixzz4O6eLOWN5


Maybe we could get Putin to send Article 50 to the EU in Bruxelles on our behalf (Air Mail) that would settle the Brexit negotiations very quickly! :lol: :lol: :lol:


Oh for crying out loud. Threatening us with nuclear annihilation. That is the first sign of desperateness! it means you acknowledge that the USA will dispense with Russia in a conventional war in a matter of days, and need these super weapons as a deterrent.

Rest assured, that if the USA thinks Russia will use these weapons, it will be turned to glass within 90 minutes. 2 can play that game!

But it's good to see you try to come to terms with reality. these weapons mean nothing. It's the last bastion for the weak, and inferior. When you got old and mechanically unsound Aircraft carrier come up against 10 Nimitz Class Aircraft carriers of the US Fleet, I know where my money is on.

Image
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby Paphitis » Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:37 am

Robin Hood wrote:I have tried to find out what is happening around Mosul ....... there is NOTHING available, even in the independent press except for opinion. There are no real facts available on civilian casualties ...... I find this very strange after all the condemnation of Syria and Russia and there so called 'war crimes' in Aleppo. Few reports of air raids ..... although living within ear shot of Akrotiri they still appear to be very active, presumably bombing around Mosul?

This is an opinion .... I tend to mainly agree with:

US, Allies Massacre at Will, Yet Condemn Russia - By Finian Cunningham

The rogue-state behavior of Washington and its allies has become so rampant it is no longer possible to hide.

The public anger and disdain for this murdering cabal is fuelled not only by what they see in Syria and the region. People all around the world are making the connection that US-led warmongering and dirty wars are rooted in the same murdering and plundering capitalist system that is killing their own societies and communities.

People are realizing more than ever that the high and mighty Western leaders who presume to sit as judges casting condemnations on others are actually the lowest, most despicable criminals.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e45731.htm


there is plenty available, just none from your propaganda sites because they are all embarrassed about their own conduct and don't want to show that mosul is still largely intact.

if we wanted to raise it, we would have done it in 48 hours, but that is not how we do business. We are trying to rebuild Iraq, not destroy it.

that's the reason why we are winning, and Pootin has already lost.

Not only this, but the Coalition is about to begin an offensive on Raqqa. Our forces have surrounded the city. If Assad comes anywhere near it, then expect repercussions.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby Paphitis » Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:43 am

Get Real! wrote:A Russian Kornet ATGM wastes an “indestructible” Abrams... :lol:



Oh the butthurst! poor bugger!
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby miltiades » Wed Oct 26, 2016 5:11 am

" - a coalition every post that you make on Syria you distance your self from reality.
Do tell us how the USA and West carry out this vetting process. As for Sharia law, I was under the impression that the West was fighting ISIS the very people who are trying to establish this medieval so called law in this part of the world.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: The war against Syria

Postby Robin Hood » Wed Oct 26, 2016 6:20 am

miltiades wrote:" - a coalition every post that you make on Syria you distance your self from reality.
Do tell us how the USA and West carry out this vetting process. As for Sharia law, I was under the impression that the West was fighting ISIS the very people who are trying to establish this medieval so called law in this part of the world.


He left the real world years ago` :roll: :lol: :lol:

He mocks the Russian aircraft carrier and for sure its a 30 year old rust bucket ...... the Russians know that. It is simply a floating airfield but with permanent airfields in Syria they don't really need it The Russians are far smarter than the US they realized some years ago that for the price of one aircraft carrier, not taking into account the battle group it needs for 'protection,' that they could produce 100's if not 1000's of missiles any one of which could take out a whole carrier battle group ...... and the US would not see it coming until it was too late. So they designed missiles that were maneuverable, very fast, ballistic and could not be targeted by their enemy's defensive systems. Smart thinking or what?

The US build aggressive systems like carriers to threaten the rest of the world with their military might. One multiheaded missile ..... and the carrier group would be history. Russia would be safe because the US would not dare launch a nuclear attack because they would be well aware of the consequences for the US mainland ...... sort of Paphitis' theory with the boot on the other foot! :roll:
Robin Hood
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4306
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: Limassol

Re: The war against Syria

Postby Get Real! » Wed Oct 26, 2016 7:31 am

Has anyone come across any UN resolutions issued against the criminal United States for this…

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/07/l ... 29897.html

No? :?

Ah well, I’m sure Psoritis will have a perfectly valid explanation for it! :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Re: The war against Syria

Postby Paphitis » Wed Oct 26, 2016 7:40 am

Get Real! wrote:Has anyone come across any UN resolutions issued against the criminal United States for this…

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/07/l ... 29897.html

No? :?

Ah well, I’m sure Psoritis will have a perfectly valid explanation for it! :lol:


It's actually legal to target anyone who is giving material support to islamic state.

The Rules of Engagement were changed only a few months ago to broaden the target base to include any civilians who are supporting ISIL activities in the field. it was even mentioned in Australia's Parliament.

The classification for some civilians has changed to 'legal combatant"

http://www.skynews.com.au/news/politics ... hange.html

So you have to be absolutely sure that the Coalition has deliberately targeted civilians, or whether there was another reason for it. previously, there were restrictions and people offering material support to ISIL could not be targeted.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests