Cyprus-Forum.com

by **Cap** » Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:06 pm

This debate covers most of what CF has covered already.
Should interest everybody.

Michio like you've never seen him before.. PISSED OFF! :lol:

Oksana grills him but he counters well.

by **Get Real!** » Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:46 pm

I’m starting to warm to the idea of WMD against civilians…

I guess 9/11 and the 2,000 odd victims were justified because only God knows how many millions of America’s enemies would’ve died had they launched an invasion on American soil.

:lol:

by **Get Real!** » Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:57 pm

It would be hypocritical not to see that through 9/11 America’s enemies saved many lives and should therefore be commended for their heroic actions.

Now that's a major FACEPALM for the American penis blowers!

:lol:

by **Get Real!** » Sat Aug 17, 2013 5:08 pm

And the moral of this story is… what's good for the goose is good for the gander. :wink:

by **supporttheunderdog** » Sat Aug 17, 2013 9:15 pm

Get Real! wrote:And the moral of this story is… what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

I have to agree with Milti about you on the topic of the USA....

by **Get Real!** » Sat Aug 17, 2013 10:12 pm

supporttheunderdog wrote:
Get Real! wrote:And the moral of this story is… what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

I have to agree with Milti about you on the topic of the USA....

That’s because you and Milti’s sense of judgment stinks like a Moroccan sewer in 45 degree heat.

by **Cap** » Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:20 pm

Sorry dude, I'm with Milti as well.
It just makes more sense.

by **Oceanside50** » Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:42 pm

Oksana came across as very foolish, unfortunately,because the non existence of WMD was widely accepted before the war against Iraq. If anyone bothered to read the newspapers at the time , they were filled with statements by high ranking officials including the CIA's Greek director testifying that there was no evidence of WMD.. Nevertheless the public supported a war and so did George Bush and Vp Cheney...

by **Get Real!** » Sat Aug 17, 2013 11:50 pm

Cap wrote::lol:

Sorry dude, I'm with Milti as well.
It just makes more sense.

There’s no doubt about it that knocking out the twin towers saved hundreds of thousands of lives that would’ve otherwise been lost had there been a land invasion of America.

And who can prove the opposite?

The theory is using exactly the same logic that Americans use to justify their murderous bombings of Japan.

Given that both events are justified by predicting a worse outcome via an alternative route, then they are equally credible as they are both based on assumption.

by **Paphitis** » Sun Aug 18, 2013 1:28 am

Well, they shouldn't have knocked out the World Trade Center and perhaps there would be no Invasion of Afghanistan and Osama may still be alive.

Simple as that...

You can't expect to attack American Soil and expect to get away with it. Acting all defeatist and cowardly is a Greek thing because in this case you can occupy a "Greek Island" and not do anything about it for 40 years! :lol: