The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Why Cricket is better than Football

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Why Cricket is better than Football

Postby Paphitis » Sun Nov 24, 2013 10:45 am

Cricket is a game of individual contests played by teams; football is a team game played by ego-maniacal individuals.

Cricket is all about adding to your own tally – how many runs can you score, how may wickets can you take – but you are always fulfilling your role within a team. In football, anyone can score, anyone can make the mistake that loses the game, and yet everyone thinks that they are the greatest player ever to don boots and the only one who can win the match. Being a cricketer means shelving personal ambition for the sake of the team; being a footballer means loving yourself more than you could ever be loved by another.

No-one ever got sent out by a games master to play cricket in the rain – enough said.

Cricket can only really be played in clement weather conditions. A game which carries with it the possibility of double pneumonia must, by definition, be a crap one.

No cricketer ever fell flat on their face in an attempt to win favour with an official.

Even football fans are sick of watching players trip over a blade of grass and then attempt to convince the referee that their leg has been broken by an opponent. And if the referee doesn’t fall for it, their mates will surround the referee and shout at him like a drunken mob who’ve just been told that McDonald’s is closed. Try that in cricket and, you’ll be going home minus your match fee and with a special two week holiday.

You can have an education and still be a professional cricketer


When did you last hear of a footballer going to university? In England, Frank Lampard is regarded as being ‘clever’ because he has 12 O levels. That’s entry level for most cricketers. And at some sides a degree is almost a minimum requirement, preferably one in something business-related. A footballer’s knowledge of business tends to be limited to seeing how much they can get for selling their **** to a deodorant manufacturer.

Even the morbidly obese can play cricket, just ask Yuvraj

When did you see a fat footballer? Ever? Compare that to a world with Yuvi, Mark Cosgrove, Merv Hughes, Shane Warne, Jesse Ryder and goodness knows who else. Cricket isn’t only great, it is all-inclusive. You can be as fat as these five, as thin as Finn, or you can have the 6′10″ Will Jefferson batting with 5″5′ James Taylor. Size doesn’t matter. Shape doesn’t matter. It is a sport for everyone. Football, on the other hand, is mostly played by clones whose idea of diversity is to allow Peter Crouch to fall over once in a while.

In the last 44 years, England have reached 5 world finals and even won one of them


Winning the football world cup can’t be that hard, because France have done it and the French are the kids in the class with the word ‘Loser’ written on their forehead in green ink. Even Greece has won a European football Championship! :shock: Even allowing for the fact that England have made heavy weather of four of those finals and ended up losing them, it is still 5 finals more than the footballers have managed.

Not every cricketer is an overpaid, preening, halfwit who blubs when things don’t go their way

Football is full of them, the players whose every mistake was someone else’s fault. Contrast that with Matt Prior and Craig Kieswetter both owning up to their deficiencies behind the stumps recently. Footballers would rather whine and pout until someone buys them another sports car than do anything remotely introspective or exhibit an ounce of self-awareness.

Not only is the drinking of alcohol at cricket matches allowed, it is positively encouraged (I accept that this is not true in some countries, but you wouldn’t be allowed to drink at football matches there, either) - do I need to explain this one?

No cricketer ever made a record as bad as this



Or this



Neither of which I am going to explain, because I can’t. What the **** were they thinking?

You can support your national cricket team without turning into a flag-waving moron

Cricket fans know that you don’t need to trumpet your nationality. If you are in England, logic dictates that you are likely to be an England fan. If you are in Australia, logic dictates that you are likely to be a fan of Australia. The theory falls down somewhat in a country like Cyprus where a fan there is just as likely to be a fan of Greece and Turkey which is just not normal or logical - but that's another story! :P If you support someone else, then you need to fly the flag and tell people who you support. Flying an England flag in England or an Australian Flag in Australia just tells us that your genitals are undersized and that your job description includes the words “Do you want fries with that?”. No comment on Greek and Turkish Flags in Cyprus! That just can't be explained. :wink:

Yep, Football is the opiate of the masses - a simple game for simple people! :wink:
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Why Cricket is better than Football

Postby kentish » Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:21 am

hahaha what a snob, unless you are bored my friend and you posted this as a tongue in cheek offering, it is just about the silliest thing i have ever read. basically if you like cricket watch it and if you like football watch that. it also looks as if you have never watched an india v pakistan cricket match
kentish
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:56 pm

Re: Why Cricket is better than Football

Postby Flying Horse » Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:26 am

Any 'sport' where men play with their balls is crap!



:nevil:
User avatar
Flying Horse
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:38 pm

Re: Why Cricket is better than Football

Postby Paphitis » Sun Nov 24, 2013 11:48 am

Flying Horse wrote:Any 'sport' where men play with their balls is crap!



:nevil:


Women are welcome to play with our balls too! :P
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Why Cricket is better than Football

Postby repulsewarrior » Sun Nov 24, 2013 5:01 pm

...curling comes to mind, another sport that demands the finest in hand eye coordination, (democratic because anyone can play, (and it is not based on violent contact)), also compared similarly to hockey (like football in Europe) which is a mainstay to North Americans.

sport it seems is as diverse as the populations which support them. any game, to the purist, (swimming, running, etc.) with balls is not sport per se, playing with balls though is a sport in itself, i like to play with some balls, women have them too, only higher (on the body), and in many more shapes and sizes.
User avatar
repulsewarrior
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 13940
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:13 am
Location: homeless in Canada


Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest