Cyprus-Forum.com

[kurupetos]

He was not Jesus' father, dog.

That's all bullshit written by man to depict something they believed to be more befitting of the Son of God and as such it had to be miraculous.

In all likelihood, Joseph was the biological father. Jesus was also a better bloke than is explained by the scriptures. It is also widely believed that after saving Magdalena from a brutal stoning, he fell in love with her and had children together. Now that would not fit in with the doctrines of the man made Church.

And btw, the Jews and Israelis do not hate Jesus. They are generally a nice people, who do not hate Palestinians either, aside from some Orthodox Jews who seem to have your type of "thinking".

There is no evidence for you drivel. Read the text of the true events by the four Evangelists!

Actually, there is no evidence of the Christian dogmas or of the miraculous birth and resurrection.

But there is such a thing as common sense, and for Jesus to be born, a male and a female did the wild thing. That was Joseph and Mary.

As to the relationship with Magdalena, there is plenty of evidence within the Bible which tells of Jesus' love for her, and Magdelena's (a Jewish Girl) dedication to him till death do them part.

That was funny... probably you have never read the new testament.

Your common sense is just a hypothesis, but the four Evangelists were there, whereas you and the dog weren't.

[Paphitis]

He was not Jesus' father, dog.

That's all bullshit written by man to depict something they believed to be more befitting of the Son of God and as such it had to be miraculous.

In all likelihood, Joseph was the biological father. Jesus was also a better bloke than is explained by the scriptures. It is also widely believed that after saving Magdalena from a brutal stoning, he fell in love with her and had children together. Now that would not fit in with the doctrines of the man made Church.

And btw, the Jews and Israelis do not hate Jesus. They are generally a nice people, who do not hate Palestinians either, aside from some Orthodox Jews who seem to have your type of "thinking".

There is no evidence for you drivel. Read the text of the true events by the four Evangelists!

Actually, there is no evidence of the Christian dogmas or of the miraculous birth and resurrection.

But there is such a thing as common sense, and for Jesus to be born, a male and a female did the wild thing. That was Joseph and Mary.

As to the relationship with Magdalena, there is plenty of evidence within the Bible which tells of Jesus' love for her, and Magdelena's (a Jewish Girl) dedication to him till death do them part.

That was funny... probably you have never read the new testament.

Your common sense is just a hypothesis, but the four Evangelists were there, whereas you and the dog weren't.

Of course they were there! They had to doctor everything in order to build the Church which will trick the masses like you. The rest just do not believe that which they are spoon fed and ask questions because the doctrines are just simply an unacceptable explanation of anything. You can however connect all the dots and come up with a quite reasonable thought that Jesus and Magdalena did a lot more than simply go to the movies and make out in the back row!

[supporttheunderdog]

The earliest evidence of the gospels is from many years after the alleged events. Indeed academic research that Luke was not written by Luke the evangelist, but someone else who was a friend of Paul, and who never met Jesus.