The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive actions

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby Maximus » Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:16 pm

Mustiejodu wrote: Recently Russia showed its true colours and took what country? That is the clue ?


NATO is trying to put the noose around Russia's neck and Russia knows it. Taking Crimea (which was undemocratically ceded to Ukraine 60 years ago) is a strategic maneuvering to get her head out of the noose and to also be able to counter with her navy that is based there, to break NATO's back. Then the Russian navy will be able to move freely into the Mediterranean. I think Russia will take Turkey out next and some north African and Arab states may even send Syrian freedom fighters, from the east and south.
Maximus
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7507
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby Viewpoint » Thu Apr 03, 2014 10:02 pm

boulio wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
boulio wrote:VP PLEASE Post the 1960 security agreement the TC have with Turkey word for word thanks.please while your looking for that security agreement you can also post the number of causualties your community faced while being "crushed"


Didnt your family teach you not to respond to a question with another question, answer mine and I will answer yours.



yeah thats what i thought VP,no serious answers just propaganda


Thought so no answers just bullshit.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby boulio » Thu Apr 03, 2014 10:29 pm

find that treaty yet?
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby Viewpoint » Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:50 pm

boulio wrote:find that treaty yet?


Refer to your constitution and you will find what you seek.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby Mustiejodu » Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:45 am

boulio wrote:Turkey's actions in northern cyprus and Russia's in the Crimea are not comparable


You my son have missed the point and gone off the radar. The us,eu and uk would rather have turkey at her door steps than Russia. No matter what GC s think of turkey which is an isolated opinion the rest of the free world as mentioned need turkey in cyprus to keep their interests in tact and that's why they don't care about turkey flying in to your air space or breaking rules? It is in their interest to have a huge existence of the turkish army in cyprus that's why they never seriously object to it and that's why it has to be the turkish army. Turkey is their security guard in cyprus keeping everything in check in the surrounding area. Why do you think when cyprus wanted to bring messiles from Russia into cyprus turkey threatened to invade and no USA,UK or EU objected because they know GC s are a grey area and they can turn their backs on the western world and align with Russia that's the only reason they allowed you into eu. It was just to dangle a carrot. Are they not doing the same to Ukraine ? Open your eyes and stop protesting for turkey to get out of cyprus because their presence actually keeps the peace and if you can't see it then you are blind. With the british and turkish presence in cyprus this keeps your russian comrads out of cyprus and keeps you in check because GC s have proven in history not to be trusted as if you had the chance you would want to gain backing from Russia more than the support you already get. Forget about the turkish army withdrawing from cyprus given the obvious intentions of Russia turkey would increase her army presence in cyprus. Cyprus is just a big army barracks for turkey.
Mustiejodu
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 713
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2014 8:02 am

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby boulio » Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:13 am

Viewpoint wrote:
boulio wrote:find that treaty yet?


Refer to your constitution and you will find what you seek.


Word for word vp about the security agreement
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby boulio » Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:14 am

Mustiejodu wrote:
boulio wrote:Turkey's actions in northern cyprus and Russia's in the Crimea are not comparable


You my son have missed the point and gone off the radar. The us,eu and uk would rather have turkey at her door steps than Russia. No matter what GC s think of turkey which is an isolated opinion the rest of the free world as mentioned need turkey in cyprus to keep their interests in tact and that's why they don't care about turkey flying in to your air space or breaking rules? It is in their interest to have a huge existence of the turkish army in cyprus that's why they never seriously object to it and that's why it has to be the turkish army. Turkey is their security guard in cyprus keeping everything in check in the surrounding area. Why do you think when cyprus wanted to bring messiles from Russia into cyprus turkey threatened to invade and no USA,UK or EU objected because they know GC s are a grey area and they can turn their backs on the western world and align with Russia that's the only reason they allowed you into eu. It was just to dangle a carrot. Are they not doing the same to Ukraine ? Open your eyes and stop protesting for turkey to get out of cyprus because their presence actually keeps the peace and if you can't see it then you are blind. With the british and turkish presence in cyprus this keeps your russian comrads out of cyprus and keeps you in check because GC s have proven in history not to be trusted as if you had the chance you would want to gain backing from Russia more than the support you already get. Forget about the turkish army withdrawing from cyprus given the obvious intentions of Russia turkey would increase her army presence in cyprus. Cyprus is just a big army barracks for turkey.



Your comments and thesis is so idiotic that it doesn't justify a reply
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby Viewpoint » Fri Apr 04, 2014 8:10 am

boulio wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
boulio wrote:find that treaty yet?


Refer to your constitution and you will find what you seek.


Word for word vp about the security agreement


Your stalling, is Turkey a guarantor power? does she have rights to intervene in Cyprus after consulting the other guarantors?

Does Crimea even have a partnership constitution like yours? even without this sort of internationally recognized agreement do you support their right to split from Ukraine.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby boulio » Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:15 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
boulio wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
boulio wrote:find that treaty yet?


Refer to your constitution and you will find what you seek.


Word for word vp about the security agreement


Your stalling, is Turkey a guarantor power? does she have rights to intervene in Cyprus after consulting the other guarantors?

Does Crimea even have a partnership constitution like yours? even without this sort of internationally recognized agreement do you support their right to split from Ukraine.


turkey is a guarantor power and she has a right to intervene,she did not consult anyone though.After she "intervene "what does the security agreement say she must do VP?YOU ARE THE ONE STALLING IM AFRAID.

COncerning Crimea she actual has full autonomous staus,her own constitiuion and parliment for the last 60 years.She was handed over to ukraine in 1954 without the conscent of the local population and if anything i would compare crimea with kosovo not northern cyprus,

Turkey and Northern cyprus is more comparable to indonesia and east timor.
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby Viewpoint » Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:27 pm

boulio wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
boulio wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
boulio wrote:find that treaty yet?


Refer to your constitution and you will find what you seek.


Word for word vp about the security agreement


Your stalling, is Turkey a guarantor power? does she have rights to intervene in Cyprus after consulting the other guarantors?

Does Crimea even have a partnership constitution like yours? even without this sort of internationally recognized agreement do you support their right to split from Ukraine.


turkey is a guarantor power and she has a right to intervene,she did not consult anyone though.After she "intervene "what does the security agreement say she must do VP?YOU ARE THE ONE STALLING IM AFRAID.

COncerning Crimea she actual has full autonomous staus,her own constitiuion and parliment for the last 60 years.She was handed over to ukraine in 1954 without the conscent of the local population and if anything i would compare crimea with kosovo not northern cyprus,

Turkey and Northern cyprus is more comparable to indonesia and east timor.


Compare it to what ever you want but the facts are Turkey intervened on her own after asking the UK who didnt want to know and the USA, she could hardly consult Greece as she was part of the problem, so we are agreed that she ahd the right to intervene, have we restoed anything, 40 years of negotiations as we have still not resolved a thing......when we do Turkey will leave. As to Kosova and Crimea each case has its own merits and I believe in power tot he people to decide if the want to have their own country, just as I believe the TCs should also be give this right but we are amicable people and will always try to compromise which for us is BBF with political equality of the 2 states, why do you not want to compromise but only want to dominate and control the whole island?
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests