The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


For civilised discussion about Islamic State

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Re: For civilised discussion about Islamic State

Postby Garavnoss » Mon Feb 23, 2015 7:40 am

Miltiades wrote: You are a passionate supporter of the savages whom you consider as courageous, I must also conclude that you !
consider other vermin such as suicide bombers who blow their filthy selves up in Mosques, markets, funeral processions, on buses, in restaurants and public places as well as BokoFuckharam who enter a school and murder young children. I can also assume that you find other anomalous disgusting acts equally courageous, perhaps you also consider the Nazis courageous, after all they faced an overwhelming number of nations opposing them.
You belong to a class of individuals that I consider, and rightly so, as educated fools bereft of even the slightest amount of logical sense.

ISIS have been referred to as barbarians by the entire Islamic world, they, ISIS , are a massive blemish on their religion and on muslims in general.

I desist entering into a meaningful debate with scum like you just as I would blemish the idea of debating the merits of paedophilia or other abominable acts as such advocates and exponents of such acts deserve no more than FUCK OFF ![/quote]






Your inability to engage in a debate is perfectly illustrated above, your opening comment immediately negates any observations that follow it since you prove yourself unable to focus upon that which you read.

I am NOT a "Passionate" supporter of the savages whom I consider courageous, I merely credit them with courage.

Your "Conclusion" is also wrong and does not qualify in a civilized debate (conclusions are an end product you see).

You then make "Assumptions" which again do not qualify in a civilized debate in the manner in which you make them.

WW2 was a full scale war, there were "Courageous" actions in every theatre of battle committed by every force involved.

You end by making statements which you consider irrefutable, therefore, as I have indicated, you do not know how to debate.

I fear you are beyond help but, a good start would be to drop the offensive bad language and personal insults.
User avatar
Garavnoss
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2014 7:36 pm

Re: For civilised discussion about Islamic State

Postby miltiades » Mon Feb 23, 2015 8:57 am

As I have stated before on many occasions, it is totally un acceptable to engage in a debate with someone who considers the acts of savages as courageous.

21 Egyptians led to the sea front and murdered in the most gruesome fashion, 32 Syrians put in a cage and set on fire, more than 100 school children shot by BFH, all these savages share a common distorted and degrading ideology, you too.

As for your comments on previous polls I can assure you, if you search, that my views are shared by the majority on this forum.

Since you decline to start a fresh poll I will shortly.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16315
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: For civilised discussion about Islamic State

Postby Garavnoss » Mon Feb 23, 2015 12:04 pm

miltiades wrote:As I have stated before on many occasions, it is totally un acceptable to engage in a debate with someone who considers the acts of savages as courageous.

21 Egyptians led to the sea front and murdered in the most gruesome fashion, 32 Syrians put in a cage and set on fire, more than 100 school children shot by BFH, all these savages share a common distorted and degrading ideology, you too.

As for your comments on previous polls I can assure you, if you search, that my views are shared by the majority on this forum.

Since you decline to start a fresh poll I will shortly.



I think you are also unable to determine just what the word "Courage" implies, it is oft present in the least of us and absent in those who consider themselves great, clearly visible on the world stage at the moment I suggest but you need the eyes to see it. :roll:
User avatar
Garavnoss
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2014 7:36 pm

Re: For civilised discussion about Islamic State

Postby Maximus » Tue Feb 24, 2015 10:00 pm

The Turkish army has seized land in Syria that belongs to a Syrian refugee to relocate the tomb. He reports that no one asked his permission and according to him its worth millions. Turkey says the land around the tomb belongs to Turkey, wherever in Syria that may be.

Meanwhile, somewhere over Anatolia, the TSK declares two of their RF-4 fighter jets crashed killing four due to unknown reasons.
Maximus
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4274
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: For civilised discussion about Islamic State

Postby Maximus » Tue Feb 24, 2015 11:08 pm

Turkey is at it again. Looting.

The world will have to cooperate with Syria to halt the trade in looted antiquities that helps fund jihadist groups, Syria’s culture minister has said, putting the onus on Turkey to stop the smuggling across their shared frontier.

“The United Nations knows for certain that the Turkish government is facilitating the smuggling of antiquities to the black market,” said Khalil.

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/syrian ... sCatID=352
Maximus
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4274
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: For civilised discussion about Islamic State

Postby Garavnoss » Tue Feb 24, 2015 11:23 pm

Miltiades wrote:I desist entering into a meaningful debate with scum like you just as I would blemish the idea of debating the merits of paedophilia or other abominable acts as such advocates and exponents of such acts deserve no more than FUCK OFF !




Not sure I understand this bit.
User avatar
Garavnoss
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2014 7:36 pm

Re: For civilised discussion about Islamic State

Postby Lordo » Tue Feb 24, 2015 11:47 pm

i dont think he understands that bit.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11518
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: For civilised discussion about Islamic State

Postby Garavnoss » Sun Mar 01, 2015 9:06 pm

Garavnoss wrote:
Miltiades wrote:I desist entering into a meaningful debate with scum like you just as I would blemish the idea of debating the merits of paedophilia or other abominable acts as such advocates and exponents of such acts deserve no more than FUCK OFF !




Not sure I understand this bit.



Could you explain please, I find it a bit confusing.
User avatar
Garavnoss
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2014 7:36 pm

Re: For civilised discussion about Islamic State

Postby miltiades » Sun Mar 01, 2015 9:29 pm

Garavnoss wrote:
Garavnoss wrote:
Miltiades wrote:I desist entering into a meaningful debate with scum like you just as I would blemish the idea of debating the merits of paedophilia or other abominable acts as such advocates and exponents of such acts deserve no more than FUCK OFF !




Not sure I understand this bit.



Could you explain please, I find it a bit confusing.

Which part do you have difficulty understanding ?
I consider, and so does the civilized society, including the overwhelming number of Muslim scholars , that these so called ISIS, are in fact barbarians, mentally disturbed as you are, they are a disgusting group of savages and anyone that considers them otherwise is himself a fucking lunatic.
End of the matter .
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16315
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: For civilised discussion about Islamic State

Postby Garavnoss » Sun Mar 01, 2015 9:51 pm

miltiades wrote:
Garavnoss wrote:
Garavnoss wrote:
Miltiades wrote:I desist entering into a meaningful debate with scum like you just as I would blemish the idea of debating the merits of paedophilia or other abominable acts as such advocates and exponents of such acts deserve no more than FUCK OFF !




Not sure I understand this bit.



Could you explain please, I find it a bit confusing.

Which part do you have difficulty understanding ?
I consider, and so does the civilized society, including the overwhelming number of Muslim scholars , that these so called ISIS, are in fact barbarians, mentally disturbed as you are, they are a disgusting group of savages and anyone that considers them otherwise is himself a fucking lunatic.
End of the matter .



Oh I see, thanks for that but it still doesn't explain the part I enquired about.
User avatar
Garavnoss
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2014 7:36 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest