The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


new bit of information

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Re: new bit of information

Postby Lordo » Wed Sep 02, 2015 6:16 pm

Sotos wrote:Erolz, it is your position which is paradoxical. The time we are talking about is BEFORE the Republic of Turkey was declared. WHO decided that such state should be declared and that homelands of Greeks (western and northern Asia Minor) should be part of this new country called Turkey? Wasn't it the Turks ALONE that decided this?

I am not sure what you would have me say to be honest ? Do I think Turkeys record with regard to ethnic minorities make up part of the Turkish nation, like Kurdish Turks, is 'good'. No it is not in my opinion. I think there has been 'progress' and there has been 'falling back'. I think it needs to be 'much better'. I also think that there is not the kind of unanimity within the group that is Kurdish Turks for say succession as there was amongst GC for enosis or TC against it.

So given the past and the present in Turkey you do not "support the need for and calls for some degree of separate and equal representation for them" (the non Turks in Turkey)? What I am trying to get at is some principles that should apply to all without trying to intentionally shape those principles in a way that "coincidentally" suit just one side.

you is talking bullshit again boy. upto the point of end of the first world war, greeaks in terggy and terggs in greace lived perfectly happy lives. then 1918 hit and your friends decided to attack terggy and take half of western anatolia. when your friends starting to lose the war they burnt everything to smithereens as they retaliated. after you burnt the place down greek people in terggy were exchanged with the terggish people in greace and then there was peace. at least learn your history if you are going to compare. you cant blame terggy on one side as killing armenians and then in a different argument say terggy was newly formed and greaks should have a say in what happened in terggy. you really are beyond stupid.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11518
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: new bit of information

Postby Lordo » Mon Jul 11, 2016 7:10 pm

i was watching tahsin hoca's clip today and he said something very interesting. russia approved the intervention of terggs in cyprus and also asked the bulgarians to supply jet fluid to the terggs in 1974. would you adam and eve it?
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11518
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: new bit of information

Postby kurupetos » Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:21 pm

Lordo wrote:i was watching tahsin hoca's clip today and he said something very interesting. russia approved the intervention of terggs in cyprus and also asked the bulgarians to supply jet fluid to the terggs in 1974. would you adam and eve it?

If Putin can verify this, I will accept it. :mrgreen:
User avatar
kurupetos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 17911
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Cyprus

Re: new bit of information

Postby Lordo » Tue Jul 12, 2016 11:14 am

kurupetos wrote:
Lordo wrote:i was watching tahsin hoca's clip today and he said something very interesting. russia approved the intervention of terggs in cyprus and also asked the bulgarians to supply jet fluid to the terggs in 1974. would you adam and eve it?

If Putin can verify this, I will accept it. :mrgreen:


putin was a baby when this was going on you stupid iriot.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11518
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: new bit of information

Postby kurupetos » Tue Jul 12, 2016 12:55 pm

Lordo wrote:
kurupetos wrote:
Lordo wrote:i was watching tahsin hoca's clip today and he said something very interesting. russia approved the intervention of terggs in cyprus and also asked the bulgarians to supply jet fluid to the terggs in 1974. would you adam and eve it?

If Putin can verify this, I will accept it. :mrgreen:


putin was a baby when this was going on you stupid iriot.

What's an iriot, kuz? :mrgreen:
User avatar
kurupetos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 17911
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Cyprus

Re: new bit of information

Postby Lordo » Tue Jul 12, 2016 1:05 pm

you stupid iriot.

User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11518
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: new bit of information

Postby Lordo » Wed Jul 13, 2016 2:19 pm

another questions.

are the children of roc male citizens entitled to an roc passport if their children are born in the uk?
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11518
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: new bit of information

Postby B25 » Wed Jul 13, 2016 3:17 pm

Lordo wrote:another questions.

are the children of roc male citizens entitled to an roc passport if their children are born in the uk?


Yeah, that's right, it's RoC when it suits you MFs otherwise it's the trashcan. F.U. Foreign invaders are not entitled to anything. Sod off.
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6076
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Re: new bit of information

Postby Lordo » Wed Jul 13, 2016 3:34 pm

oh ok groc then never mind roc.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11518
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: new bit of information

Postby kurupetos » Wed Jul 13, 2016 7:12 pm

Lordo wrote:oh ok groc then never mind roc.

It's better to apply when ELAM is government, kuz. I will be your 'meson'. :mrgreen:
User avatar
kurupetos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 17911
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Cyprus

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests