The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


DO YOU CONSIDER PAPHITIS VIEWS VALID

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

ARE PAPHITIS'S VIEWS ON SYRIA VALID ?

Poll ended at Tue May 31, 2016 8:49 am

YES, PAPHITIS VIEWS ON SYRIA ARE VALID
1
13%
NO, PAPHITIS VIEWS ON SYRIA ARE NOT VALID
7
88%
 
Total votes : 8

Re: DO YOU CONSIDER PAPHITIS VIEWS VALID

Postby Paphitis » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:25 am

miltiades wrote:OK , I now accept, General, that Cyprus can on its own defeat Turkey and liberate our northern parts, only if you promise to be in charge of CNG and direct, as you do in Syria, operations!!


Finally growing a brain I see.

Stick with me and you will learn a lot.

If everyone had your stupid brain, then it is pointless even starting an insurgency against a superpower like the UK in 1955 which you claim to have been a part of. Either you are too dense, or have fried your brain cells from excessive alcohol consumption.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 20971
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: DO YOU CONSIDER PAPHITIS VIEWS VALID

Postby Robin Hood » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:28 am

Paphitis:
Don't worry about it RH, but many here know exactly what I am talking about and the Gentlemen is far more intelligent than you are when it comes to Banking because he lived it for decades rather than read shit from the internet!

He is what I said he was ..... basically a book-keeper, he was never a Banker and certainly no gentleman. He was a bully who could only get his point over in the same way you do. Avoided answering any questions but loaded replies with insults, abuse and an attempt to belittle the person that calls his bluff ........... he was not even ‘something in banking’, he was an accounts keeper that’s all he knew. So CBBB like so many of your sources are feeding you bullsh*t.
I am very comfortable with my views and I form them after sound analysis of the facts unlike yourself who resorts to reading rubbish to construct a false thesis in virtually everything.

You do not analyse anything, you are incapable of analysis otherwise you would not hold your ridiculous views. Your knowledge of money creation started with MYSuper Rich’ thread and you read up on BANKING .... not money creation. I realise that is a difficult concept for you to understand. Most normal people like ‘B’, see it when they trust the source that confirms the fact. But then you are not normal! You only trust what suits your opinion.
But nevertheless, I know very well Banks create money and I think it is fantastic that they can do it, because they keep the world spinning. They just can't do it with impunity or self fund themselves. They must maintain certain liquidity levels which btw are far more stringent today.

Come on then ..... explain it to us and you can use the BoE Bulletin to demonstrate your knowledge! If you know what it is all about that should not be too difficult for you?

You are talking banking ..... it does not require banks to create money, history shows it is far more beneficial if it is created by government ..... debt free and interest free. Sorry but that just seems to be way above your level of understanding. But Trump and Corbyn understand it at least in principal .... as I said before they have worked it out.

My Nemesis on the site you refer to sent me this the other day ..... now He is someone you could see eye-to-eye with as he has very similar opinions to you on many of your subjects although intellectually he is way superior you, but to give him his due he does admit he knows nothing about money creation and/or the banking system. The source should comply with your criteria? The Telegraph is hardly a ‘...Marxist Socialist agenda website’ and the subject can only be described as an extreme right wing, capitalist billionaire .... so that should also comply with your criteria:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/05/28/donald-trumps-wild-idea-about-dealing-with-debt-may-be-here-soon/

(The Telegraph link above was also on that extreme ‘Marxist Socialist agenda website’ .........Global Research (?)
It's the rest of your bullshit I take issue with, in particular your Marxist attitudes and anti-west rhetoric straight from Marxist Socialist agenda websites which feed you exactly what you want to hear.

Another assumption ..... any one that disagrees with your views is an unbridled anti-capitalist, a socialist and a Marxist! ([i]BTW: Trump disagrees with your monetary and banking views as well..... do you want his e-mail address[/i]?)

No not anti –West ..... just opposed to the obvious excesses that western style capitalism has created and continues to do so. Don’t overlook the fact that Russia as well as China are now capitalist countries! I would like to hear the truth and that I cannot get just from reading stories in the MSM, so I look for other sources and they are not what you say they are.

You see how stupid some of the things you say are? What I read, which is a span of maybe 20-25 different sources you consider as rubbish but ..... a one man band in Coventry, who is like you, vehemently anti-Assad, who gets his information from unknown sources within the anti-Assad terrorist forces and this is then what the MSM quotes and uses as a source of ‘impartial’ information ...... you believe has impeccable credentials!

You keep spouting about people being assured of having self determination and control over their own destiny in Syria and yet support terrorists trying to overthrow an elected government to enforce THEIR idea of an Islamic Caliphate? That is OK with you but then you have scant regard for the Syrian people’s choice that voted otherwise, because ‘WE’ decided it had to be a self determination that suited ‘OUR’ purposes .

BUT ..... put the boot on the other foot and apply it to Crimea, where 90% of the people exercised their self determination, voted to leave Ukraine and then asked Russia to absorb them back into their Russian Mother land ...... you condemn their free choice! These people don’t want to overthrow the unelected Ukraine Government that came to power through a US engineered coup .......... they just don’t want to be part of it.

Then you go on to condemn Russia supporting the people of Donetsk and Mariupol against a brutal regime with Nazism as their creed, that made it very clear they wanted them out or dead. Don’t you think all THAT a bit hypocritical?

I’m sorry Paphitis but your opinions and grand proclamations have no credibility and the way you express yourself makes you look rather pathetic and a real dork! :roll:
Robin Hood
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: Limassol

Re: DO YOU CONSIDER PAPHITIS VIEWS VALID

Postby miltiades » Thu Jun 02, 2016 12:14 pm

Paphitis wrote:
miltiades wrote:OK , I now accept, General, that Cyprus can on its own defeat Turkey and liberate our northern parts, only if you promise to be in charge of CNG and direct, as you do in Syria, operations!!


Finally growing a brain I see.

Stick with me and you will learn a lot.

If everyone had your stupid brain, then it is pointless even starting an insurgency against a superpower like the UK in 1955 which you claim to have been a part of. Either you are too dense, or have fried your brain cells from excessive alcohol consumption.

A gorilla warfare against the British in 1955 is a totally different issue. Declaring a war on Turkey is much different since Turkey would not flinch from bombing the RoC . It would be suicide for Cyprus to even consider such an act. On our own we dont stand a chance, we would need help from a superpower, Russia perhaps ??

Nobody in their right mind would consider war on Turkey as winnable, only a complete and utter dreamer such as you would contemplate such a scenario.

As for my part in the struggle, I did state many times in the past that I joined the youth movement of EOKA, known as ANE, ALKIMOS NEOLEA EOKA, at the age of 12 in 1958. We were used as couriers.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16315
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: DO YOU CONSIDER PAPHITIS VIEWS VALID

Postby Paphitis » Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:18 am

miltiades wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
miltiades wrote:OK , I now accept, General, that Cyprus can on its own defeat Turkey and liberate our northern parts, only if you promise to be in charge of CNG and direct, as you do in Syria, operations!!


Finally growing a brain I see.

Stick with me and you will learn a lot.

If everyone had your stupid brain, then it is pointless even starting an insurgency against a superpower like the UK in 1955 which you claim to have been a part of. Either you are too dense, or have fried your brain cells from excessive alcohol consumption.

A gorilla warfare against the British in 1955 is a totally different issue. Declaring a war on Turkey is much different since Turkey would not flinch from bombing the RoC . It would be suicide for Cyprus to even consider such an act. On our own we dont stand a chance, we would need help from a superpower, Russia perhaps ??

Nobody in their right mind would consider war on Turkey as winnable, only a complete and utter dreamer such as you would contemplate such a scenario.

As for my part in the struggle, I did state many times in the past that I joined the youth movement of EOKA, known as ANE, ALKIMOS NEOLEA EOKA, at the age of 12 in 1958. We were used as couriers.


You silly bugger. No one declares war these days. A State of War already exists since 1974.

The CNG is in a position to be able to engage in various activities against the occupying power, which in my view, can also include a coordinated advance against the occupying power across the Green Ceasefire line. Such an action would need to take into consideration the International responce to such an act and its ramifications, even though International Law favours the RoC. That is the job of the political leadership, not the CNG.

What would be better, if hostilities commence is that the Turks start it, and my view is that the CNG has enough strength to make significant advances into the occupied areas and quite possibly find themselves in control of a lot of territory.

In fact, I think the Balance of Power is with the CNG with its 100,000 troops fully mobilized, great Air Defence, Armour, and Mechanized Infantry which can operate in small numbers and negate the effectiveness of the TAF.

You disagree with this, but no one ever accused you of having a brain.

You are just an illiterate nincompoop who holds onto the the old wife's tail that the CNG is ineffective. That is not the case. The CNG is just perfect to be able to hold its own against Turkey on the island, and even win. You seem to think it will just like 1974. But if Cyprus had the similar capabilities as what it possesses today, then Turkey would find it very hard to even land troops on the island let alone take control of 37%

CNG is able to do a lot of damage, provided everyone is trained to the highest standards.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 20971
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: DO YOU CONSIDER PAPHITIS VIEWS VALID

Postby miltiades » Fri Jun 03, 2016 6:02 am

Paphitis wrote:
miltiades wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
miltiades wrote:OK , I now accept, General, that Cyprus can on its own defeat Turkey and liberate our northern parts, only if you promise to be in charge of CNG and direct, as you do in Syria, operations!!


Finally growing a brain I see.

Stick with me and you will learn a lot.

If everyone had your stupid brain, then it is pointless even starting an insurgency against a superpower like the UK in 1955 which you claim to have been a part of. Either you are too dense, or have fried your brain cells from excessive alcohol consumption.

A gorilla warfare against the British in 1955 is a totally different issue. Declaring a war on Turkey is much different since Turkey would not flinch from bombing the RoC . It would be suicide for Cyprus to even consider such an act. On our own we dont stand a chance, we would need help from a superpower, Russia perhaps ??

Nobody in their right mind would consider war on Turkey as winnable, only a complete and utter dreamer such as you would contemplate such a scenario.

As for my part in the struggle, I did state many times in the past that I joined the youth movement of EOKA, known as ANE, ALKIMOS NEOLEA EOKA, at the age of 12 in 1958. We were used as couriers.


You silly bugger. No one declares war these days. A State of War already exists since 1974.

The CNG is in a position to be able to engage in various activities against the occupying power, which in my view, can also include a coordinated advance against the occupying power across the Green Ceasefire line. Such an action would need to take into consideration the International responce to such an act and its ramifications, even though International Law favours the RoC. That is the job of the political leadership, not the CNG.

What would be better, if hostilities commence is that the Turks start it, and my view is that the CNG has enough strength to make significant advances into the occupied areas and quite possibly find themselves in control of a lot of territory.

In fact, I think the Balance of Power is with the CNG with its 100,000 troops fully mobilized, great Air Defence, Armour, and Mechanized Infantry which can operate in small numbers and negate the effectiveness of the TAF.

You disagree with this, but no one ever accused you of having a brain.

You are just an illiterate nincompoop who holds onto the the old wife's tail that the CNG is ineffective. That is not the case. The CNG is just perfect to be able to hold its own against Turkey on the island, and even win. You seem to think it will just like 1974. But if Cyprus had the similar capabilities as what it possesses today, then Turkey would find it very hard to even land troops on the island let alone take control of 37%

CNG is able to do a lot of damage, provided everyone is trained to the highest standards.

So the CNG can do a lot of damage, how about the Turkish air force, perhaps or probable widespread indiscriminate bombing , how about the Turkish navy, more bombing indiscriminately. You are nothing but a delusional dreamer to suggest that a tiny force can inflict severe damage on the worlds 6th largest military power. How many Cypriots young and old , young men and women, little children will perish. Will you join and fight the Turkish army, or direct operations as you do in Syria from the comfort of your armchair.

Your credibility has not only diminished but extinguished. Your views on the Syrian issue are shared by NONE, yet you have the audacity to claim .....victory.

To the Cypriots the issue is and must be dealt with in a political arena where WE can win, not on the battlefield.

You constantly, just like the other psychopath, project an image of a caring individual judging by your crocodile tears regarding the Syrian sunnies. The other psychopath cares so much about the plight of the Palestinian people that he would rather see the entire island occupied by Turkey than the continuation of the Palestinian plight. What a fucking pair of morons, one brain cell between them. Both you and he, the... caring duo expressed a wish to piss on my grave, fine .....Cypriots when wishing another Cypriot an early death.

I sussed you out long ago, you are an utterly immature and may I also say lacking of confidence and stature. This bravado is merely a camouflage of your insecurities and perhaps inability to interact with people. I'm a 70 year old, a grandfather, a father, I do not boast that my kids are wealthy due to my .....ability to make money, something you do.

I suggest that you re examine your conscious and your views on a huge variety of issues, not least your views on Syria and on Cyprus, that according to you is a third world nation. Mate you are naïve and still wet behind the ears.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16315
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: DO YOU CONSIDER PAPHITIS VIEWS VALID

Postby Paphitis » Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:14 am

miltiades wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
miltiades wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
miltiades wrote:OK , I now accept, General, that Cyprus can on its own defeat Turkey and liberate our northern parts, only if you promise to be in charge of CNG and direct, as you do in Syria, operations!!


Finally growing a brain I see.

Stick with me and you will learn a lot.

If everyone had your stupid brain, then it is pointless even starting an insurgency against a superpower like the UK in 1955 which you claim to have been a part of. Either you are too dense, or have fried your brain cells from excessive alcohol consumption.

A gorilla warfare against the British in 1955 is a totally different issue. Declaring a war on Turkey is much different since Turkey would not flinch from bombing the RoC . It would be suicide for Cyprus to even consider such an act. On our own we dont stand a chance, we would need help from a superpower, Russia perhaps ??

Nobody in their right mind would consider war on Turkey as winnable, only a complete and utter dreamer such as you would contemplate such a scenario.

As for my part in the struggle, I did state many times in the past that I joined the youth movement of EOKA, known as ANE, ALKIMOS NEOLEA EOKA, at the age of 12 in 1958. We were used as couriers.


You silly bugger. No one declares war these days. A State of War already exists since 1974.

The CNG is in a position to be able to engage in various activities against the occupying power, which in my view, can also include a coordinated advance against the occupying power across the Green Ceasefire line. Such an action would need to take into consideration the International responce to such an act and its ramifications, even though International Law favours the RoC. That is the job of the political leadership, not the CNG.

What would be better, if hostilities commence is that the Turks start it, and my view is that the CNG has enough strength to make significant advances into the occupied areas and quite possibly find themselves in control of a lot of territory.

In fact, I think the Balance of Power is with the CNG with its 100,000 troops fully mobilized, great Air Defence, Armour, and Mechanized Infantry which can operate in small numbers and negate the effectiveness of the TAF.

You disagree with this, but no one ever accused you of having a brain.

You are just an illiterate nincompoop who holds onto the the old wife's tail that the CNG is ineffective. That is not the case. The CNG is just perfect to be able to hold its own against Turkey on the island, and even win. You seem to think it will just like 1974. But if Cyprus had the similar capabilities as what it possesses today, then Turkey would find it very hard to even land troops on the island let alone take control of 37%

CNG is able to do a lot of damage, provided everyone is trained to the highest standards.

So the CNG can do a lot of damage, how about the Turkish air force, perhaps or probable widespread indiscriminate bombing , how about the Turkish navy, more bombing indiscriminately. You are nothing but a delusional dreamer to suggest that a tiny force can inflict severe damage on the worlds 6th largest military power. How many Cypriots young and old , young men and women, little children will perish. Will you join and fight the Turkish army, or direct operations as you do in Syria from the comfort of your armchair.

Your credibility has not only diminished but extinguished. Your views on the Syrian issue are shared by NONE, yet you have the audacity to claim .....victory.

To the Cypriots the issue is and must be dealt with in a political arena where WE can win, not on the battlefield.

You constantly, just like the other psychopath, project an image of a caring individual judging by your crocodile tears regarding the Syrian sunnies. The other psychopath cares so much about the plight of the Palestinian people that he would rather see the entire island occupied by Turkey than the continuation of the Palestinian plight. What a fucking pair of morons, one brain cell between them. Both you and he, the... caring duo expressed a wish to piss on my grave, fine .....Cypriots when wishing another Cypriot an early death.

I sussed you out long ago, you are an utterly immature and may I also say lacking of confidence and stature. This bravado is merely a camouflage of your insecurities and perhaps inability to interact with people. I'm a 70 year old, a grandfather, a father, I do not boast that my kids are wealthy due to my .....ability to make money, something you do.

I suggest that you re examine your conscious and your views on a huge variety of issues, not least your views on Syria and on Cyprus, that according to you is a third world nation. Mate you are naïve and still wet behind the ears.


Are you serious?

Firstly, the TAF would be as effective as the entire Coalition Air Force and Russian Air Force against ISIL/DAESH and other Rebels which as you can see, is not very effective at all. A war can't be won from the air, and unless you are willing to hit civilian targets like the Russians are in Syria, you won't achieve that much other than support Ground Troops.

Secondly, my views are shared by the vast majority around the world. In most Western Countries, EU countries, my views are pretty stock standard. The Russians lack international support, and so does Assad. You would think that would tell you something. Perhaps you might be wrong about Assad.

Look, you are a complete dork. You were backing Assad and Russia expecting this to be wrapped up a few months ago, but you have been left with egg on your face, and in case you have not noticed, it is the Coalition which is winning the turf war in Syria not Assad or Russia.

I tried to warn you, but you were just being an idiot!
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 20971
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: DO YOU CONSIDER PAPHITIS VIEWS VALID

Postby Tim Drayton » Fri Jun 03, 2016 1:47 pm

Brilliant. The HDP are taking their case to challenge the lifting of their MPs parliamentary immunity to the European Court of Human Rights now that the Constitutional Court in Turkey has just announced that it has dismissed its claim (and it has thus obviously exhausted all domestic remedies). A case in the ECHR that goes to the heart of the rapidly consolidating Erdoğan dictatorship? Brilliant.

http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/turk ... recek.html

PS - The relevance of this post to this thread as a whole is zero, but it does relate to some other comments I made above.
User avatar
Tim Drayton
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8226
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:32 am
Location: Limassol/Lemesos

Re: DO YOU CONSIDER PAPHITIS VIEWS VALID

Postby Robin Hood » Fri Jun 03, 2016 7:22 pm

Paphitis:
Secondly, my views are shared by the vast majority around the world
.

Blimey .... he's gone from speaking for all the forum members ..... to speaking on behalf of US/NATO ...... speaking on behalf of the UN .......and now he is speaking for the rest of the World

Next he will claim he speaks for God, is the new Mesiah and is here to start a new religion 'Paphitism' . (Got to admit .... it's got a nice ring to it ..... 'P-a-ph-it-ism' ) :idea:

There is no limit to this mans talents ..... I think he should be put forward for the command of the first space ship to Mars ..... apparently it is one way trip. :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Robin Hood
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: Limassol

Re: DO YOU CONSIDER PAPHITIS VIEWS VALID

Postby miltiades » Fri Jun 03, 2016 7:53 pm

Robin Hood wrote:Paphitis:
Secondly, my views are shared by the vast majority around the world
.

Blimey .... he's gone from speaking for all the forum members ..... to speaking on behalf of US/NATO ...... speaking on behalf of the UN .......and now he is speaking for the rest of the World

Next he will claim he speaks for God, is the new Mesiah and is here to start a new religion 'Paphitism' . (Got to admit .... it's got a nice ring to it ..... 'P-a-ph-it-ism' ) :idea:

There is no limit to this mans talents ..... I think he should be put forward for the command of the first space ship to Mars ..... apparently it is one way trip. :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:

He is a complete idiot, and a fucking liar as well. He is an air steward who tells everyone that he is a ....pilot!!
He also boasts of his ....enormous wealth, his children he says DO NOT have to worry about earning their living, he has provided them with a .....nest egg. The idiot thinks that everyone shares his views, yet we all know that on this forum nobody does.
Ignore the moron, hopefully he may just do a ...Houdini. Some years back he said goodbye to everyone even posting his own tomb stone. A couple of days later he was back.

Look at the number of posts he has made, crap all of them !
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16315
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: DO YOU CONSIDER PAPHITIS VIEWS VALID

Postby Get Real! » Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:52 pm

miltiades wrote:A gorilla warfare against the British in 1955 is a totally different issue.

It's "guerrilla" you gorilla! :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 40379
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests