The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


For Kikapu

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

For Kikapu

Postby B25 » Mon Jul 25, 2016 4:26 pm

Mate,

further to your theories about the fake 9/11 incident, here is some interesting info for you.

All those idiots that still believe that the planes brought down the towers, eat your hearts out.

http://worldtruth.tv/cia-pilot-presents ... rs-on-911/
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6067
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Re: For Kikapu

Postby Kikapu » Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:01 pm

B25 wrote:Mate,

further to your theories about the fake 9/11 incident, here is some interesting info for you.

All those idiots that still believe that the planes brought down the towers, eat your hearts out.

http://worldtruth.tv/cia-pilot-presents ... rs-on-911/


Thanks B25. When I have extra time, I'll dive more into the article, but from what I've read so far in the article and not having read any part of the 9/11 commissions findings, I have one question to the author of the article, which is, if a bomb was the cause of the blasts which brought down the twin towers, how was it the bomb blasts were able to create a recognizable shape that seems to have been cut into the building in a shape of a plane at the point of impact side of the buildings, AND, how was it that the fireballs came out of the building on the opposite side of where the impact of the aircraft, which according to the author, it was not the aircraft that hit the buildings, but the blast was a result of bombs.

If we believe the author, surely the fireball would have been on the same side of the building as he claims the holes in the building were not made by the aircraft flying into it but instead made by a bomb. To me it doesn't add up, but I will read the whole article when I have more time.

Just one more thing to think about. The planes did not destroy the steel beams which caused the buildings to collapse. It was the fire at high temperatures which caused the steel to buckle that cause the buildings to collapse. Once the steel beams buckled the weight of the building above the point of impacts just crushed the floors beneath it one floor at a time imploding within.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 13540
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Re: For Kikapu

Postby Lordo » Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:06 pm

bull shit and more. the towers being hit were captured by many cameras. if you understood anything about constuction of those building you would also understand why they collapsed the way they did.

in his expert opinion aint woth jack shit old man.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11518
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: For Kikapu

Postby Maximus » Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:53 pm

Watch the embedded video.

I think they are basically saying that there is no way that an airplane could cut through the tower's beems like that and many people did not happeen to record the planes crashing. We just have a 'few' captures which this author claims are doctored with CGI.
Maximus
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4274
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: For Kikapu

Postby Maximus » Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:10 pm

Why when one plane goes in to one of the towers its nose comes out the other end still intact but when the other went in to the other tower, it didnt come through the other end?
Maximus
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4274
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: For Kikapu

Postby Get Real! » Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:19 pm

Maximus wrote:I think they are basically saying that there is no way that an airplane could cut through the tower's beems like that...

I don’t see much difference between a large rocket or missile and a plane hitting a building.

They both have the right shape, a high speed, and carry plenty of combustible material on board so a plane used in this way is essentially a rocket or a missile.

And yes it *should* be able to slice through those beams because it’s traveling at a great speed thereby substantially increasing the force of the impact.

These are special beams designed to withstand wind not a 200 ton jumbo jet traveling at 200mph!

I for one don't agree with this assessment.
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 40382
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Re: For Kikapu

Postby Maximus » Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:28 pm

do you see the difference If this was scaled down so the plane represented a hollow bullet and the towers represented a steel plate? Would the bullet penetrate the steel plate?
Maximus
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4274
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: For Kikapu

Postby Lordo » Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:33 pm

Maximus wrote:Why when one plane goes in to one of the towers its nose comes out the other end still intact but when the other went in to the other tower, it didnt come through the other end?

more bullshit. these kind of building have a solid concrete lift shaft which is used to support the building and the rest is steel frame with glass walls. if one hits the lif shaft and the other one does not that is exactly what will happen. people are just too stupid. listen to the construction engineers. they explained exactly what happened.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11518
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: For Kikapu

Postby Get Real! » Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:35 pm

Maximus wrote:do you see the difference If this was scaled down so the plane represented a bullet and the towers represented a steel plate? Would the bullet penetrate the steel plate?

That's not a correct comparison... you can't scale things down like that without also softening the materials.

Try this for an experiment...

If I were to turn the building on its side and simply place the 200 ton plane on the building’s side the beams would collapse from the plane's weight let alone a moving weight!

You can easily calculate the Energy of the impact if you have the exact weight and speed and I'm sure you'd find that the energy produced would be tremendous.
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 40382
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Re: For Kikapu

Postby Maximus » Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:38 pm

Get Real! wrote:
Maximus wrote:do you see the difference If this was scaled down so the plane represented a bullet and the towers represented a steel plate? Would the bullet penetrate the steel plate?

That's not a correct comparison... you can't scale things down like that without also softening the materials.

Try this for an experiment...

If I were to turn the building on its side and simply place the 200 ton plane on the building’s side the beams would collapse from the plane's weight let alone a moving weight!

You can easily calculate the Energy of the impact if you have the exact weight and speed and I'm sure you'd find that the energy produced would be tremendous.


I dont see how that is physically possible, those beams are strong enough to support a whole tower, which weighs much more than a boeing 747.
Maximus
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4274
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

Next

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest