The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The "Good", "Bad" & The "Compelling" Story

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Re: The "Good", "Bad" & The "Compelling" Story

Postby kurupetos » Thu Oct 06, 2016 12:59 pm

Robin Hood wrote:
Paphitis wrote:No illusions, just common sense and facts!


You don't have any common sense! :roll: So where are these facts ?

Probably somewhere in his ass.
User avatar
kurupetos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 17911
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Cyprus

Re: The "Good", "Bad" & The "Compelling" Story

Postby Paphitis » Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:25 pm

Robin Hood wrote:
Paphitis wrote:No illusions, just common sense and facts!


You don't have any common sense! :roll: So where are these facts ?


I think it is quite the opposite I am afraid.

I am very happy with my position because it is a just one. Your's isn't! You are supporting War Crimes.

You can ask anyone who's views they agree with and I am very confident that people see that I maintain the high ground and look down upon you and actually pity you!
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 20971
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: The "Good", "Bad" & The "Compelling" Story

Postby Robin Hood » Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:07 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Robin Hood wrote:
Paphitis wrote:No illusions, just common sense and facts!


You don't have any common sense! :roll: So where are these facts ?


I think it is quite the opposite I am afraid.

I am very happy with my position because it is a just one. Your's isn't! You are supporting War Crimes.

You can ask anyone who's views they agree with and I am very confident that people see that I maintain the high ground and look down upon you and actually pity you!


You are living in a fools paradise! :lol: :lol: :lol: These so called war crimes are simply what you believe from the propaganda ....... where is your evidence to support your accusations? :roll:
Robin Hood
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: Limassol

Re: The "Good", "Bad" & The "Compelling" Story

Postby Paphitis » Fri Oct 07, 2016 4:04 am

The fools are those who support war crimes and the indiscriminate slaughter of innocent civilians with Chlorine gas and barrel bombs.

you can engage in name calling all you like, but I am not the fool who is condoning war crimes from one of the most brutal regimes in modern history.

You get your own ewvidence. no matter what evidence I provide, it will never meet your standards but apparently Global Research, RT and Sputnik do. Go figure!
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 20971
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: The "Good", "Bad" & The "Compelling" Story

Postby miltiades » Fri Oct 07, 2016 9:37 am

Paphitis wrote:The fools are those who support war crimes and the indiscriminate slaughter of innocent civilians with Chlorine gas and barrel bombs.

you can engage in name calling all you like, but I am not the fool who is condoning war crimes from one of the most brutal regimes in modern history.

You get your own ewvidence. no matter what evidence I provide, it will never meet your standards but apparently Global Research, RT and Sputnik do. Go figure!

I very much doubt whether any decent human being supports war crimes, either on this forum or elsewhere. I can not understand how you have reached this conclusion.
What most support is the return of peace and stability in Syria and some of us think that this can only be achieved by defeating the rebels most of whom are affiliated to various jihadist groups. The coalition is not conducive to the return of peace on the contrary it prolongs the conflict.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16332
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: The "Good", "Bad" & The "Compelling" Story

Postby Robin Hood » Fri Oct 07, 2016 10:22 am

Paphitis wrote:The fools are those who support war crimes and the indiscriminate slaughter of innocent civilians with Chlorine gas and barrel bombs.

you can engage in name calling all you like, but I am not the fool who is condoning war crimes from one of the most brutal regimes in modern history.

You get your own evidence. no matter what evidence I provide, it will never meet your standards but apparently Global Research, RT and Sputnik do. Go figure!


That is your problem! You make sweeping, all encompassing accusations but when asked to support them with some tangible evidence ........ YOU CAN'T! That is just what the US does every time THEY make accusations. You are quick to question others sources but regard your own as beyond question. :roll:

I agree completely with what Milti says in his post ..... 100%. It is applying common sense by looking at the available evidence, evidence you will never see because in runs counter to what your sources provide! :roll:
Robin Hood
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2537
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: Limassol

Previous

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest