The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Who's in Charge: Pootin or Coalition?

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Re: Who's in Charge: Pootin or Coalition?

Postby Paphitis » Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:02 am

miltiades wrote:Who said " I HATE PUTIN MORE THAN ISIS" ?


i did and I still stand by it.

Pootin has proven to be an international menace which the USA will need to confront. if it doesn't happen over Syria, it will happen elsewhere.

Some form of direct conflict (conflict is different to war) is inevitable now.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 20971
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Who's in Charge: Pootin or Coalition?

Postby Paphitis » Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:05 am

Get Real! wrote:The Philippines has finally figured out who the enemy is…

"Duterte aligns Philippines with China, says U.S. has lost"

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china ... SKCN12K0AS


They also have plans for the extra-judicial killings of 300,000 citizens.

it's amazing that all the International pariah's congregate together with the Russians.

but I wouldn't hold your breath mate. The Philippines base substantial US Forces and in light of the South china Sea, the Philippines needs the US to protect itself from China's illegal claims.

But the International Pariah convention has been noted.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 20971
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Who's in Charge: Pootin or Coalition?

Postby Get Real! » Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:13 am

Paphitis wrote:Pootin has proven to be an international menace which the USA will need to confront. if it doesn't happen over Syria, it will happen elsewhere.

Some form of direct conflict (conflict is different to war) is inevitable now.

Russia could wipe out Australia in about 30 minutes (<-- that’s the time needed for his Mach 3…8) warheads to reach your major cities.

Australians would turn into some kind of dark smelly radioactive glass that nobody will be able to approach for 100+ years! :lol:

You would fuse with kangaroos, wallabies, and koalas into one smelly mass that resembles dirty amber! :lol:

So pray that he doesn’t read your daft posts Paphitis lest he looks in your direction in anger! :wink:

:idea: On second thoughts... consider giving him a blow job! :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 40449
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Re: Who's in Charge: Pootin or Coalition?

Postby Paphitis » Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:25 am

Get Real! wrote:
Paphitis wrote:Pootin has proven to be an international menace which the USA will need to confront. if it doesn't happen over Syria, it will happen elsewhere.

Some form of direct conflict (conflict is different to war) is inevitable now.

Russia could wipe out Australia in about 30 minutes (<-- that’s the time needed for his Mach 3…8) warheads to reach your major cities.

Australians would turn into some kind of dark smelly radioactive glass that nobody will be able to approach for 100+ years! :lol:

You would fuse with kangaroos, wallabies, and koalas into one smelly mass that resembles dirty amber! :lol:

So pray that he doesn’t read your daft posts Paphitis lest he looks in your direction in anger! :wink:

:idea: On second thoughts... consider giving him a blow job! :lol:


mate, Pootin can't even wipe out a few rebels in Aleppo!

but I encourage him to attack Australian interests in Syria and then we will see what happens. That's an Article 5 all the way. Australia is covered under NATO/ANZUS Article 5.

http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_110496.htm

Australia has already attacked assad killing 200 regime soldiers but still nothing! :?
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 20971
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Who's in Charge: Pootin or Coalition?

Postby Get Real! » Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:30 am

Paphitis wrote:Australia is covered under NATO/ANZUS Article 5.

http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_110496.htm

Australia has already attacked assad killing 200 regime soldiers but still nothing! :?

But how does your “NATO cover” work once you've been turned into some dark smelly radioactive glass? :?

Is it still applicable even after you cease to exist? :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 40449
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Re: Who's in Charge: Pootin or Coalition?

Postby Paphitis » Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:32 am

Get Real! wrote:
Paphitis wrote:Australia is covered under NATO/ANZUS Article 5.

http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_110496.htm

Australia has already attacked assad killing 200 regime soldiers but still nothing! :?

But how does your “NATO cover” work once you've been turned into some dark smelly radioactive glass? :?

Is it still applicable even after you cease to exist? :lol:


If we are turned into radioactive glass, all of Russia will be turned to radioactive glass.

We don't have a 1st strike policy, because we are not that way inclined unlike criminal pootin.

Any attack on Australia by Russia is inevitable Armageddon WW3.

So we all know, Pootin won't do that.

BTW, Australia does have a nuclear strike capability as well. we had that technology from the early 1960s but then signed the non proliferation treaty.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 20971
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Who's in Charge: Pootin or Coalition?

Postby Get Real! » Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:35 am

Paphitis wrote:Any attack on Australia by Russia is inevitable Armageddon WW3.

Of course, you have no way to verify that... especially a promise coming from the infamous nation of LIARS as they are known! :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 40449
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Re: Who's in Charge: Pootin or Coalition?

Postby Paphitis » Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:37 am

Get Real! wrote:
Paphitis wrote:Any attack on Australia by Russia is inevitable Armageddon WW3.

Of course, you have no way to verify that... especially a promise coming from the infamous nation of LIARS as they are known! :lol:


we are 100% sure. There are 50,000 US Troops in Australia and an attack on Australia is considered an Attack on USA.

The Americans have a lot of assets in Australia, and the 2 governments are pretty much joined at the hip because of their cultural ties which are extensive. They are basically one Germano/Irish people.

they both work in strange ways, have been in every war togather and even funded Sinn Fein (IRA) together against the Mother Country.
Last edited by Paphitis on Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 20971
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Who's in Charge: Pootin or Coalition?

Postby Get Real! » Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:39 am

Paphitis wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Paphitis wrote:Any attack on Australia by Russia is inevitable Armageddon WW3.

Of course, you have no way to verify that... especially a promise coming from the infamous nation of LIARS as they are known! :lol:


we are 100% sure. There are 50,000 US Troops in Australia and an attack on Australia is considered an Attack on USA.

The Americans have a lot of assets in Australia, and the 2 governments are pretty much joined at the hip because of their cultural ties which are extensive. They are basically one Germano/Irish people.

Do you know what America is gonna do?

They’re just gonna make a few fiery UN speeches and then sit back and evaluate Russian long range capabilities, and then life goes on and you won’t be missed! <-- :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 40449
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Re: Who's in Charge: Pootin or Coalition?

Postby Paphitis » Fri Oct 21, 2016 2:40 am

Get Real! wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Paphitis wrote:Any attack on Australia by Russia is inevitable Armageddon WW3.

Of course, you have no way to verify that... especially a promise coming from the infamous nation of LIARS as they are known! :lol:


we are 100% sure. There are 50,000 US Troops in Australia and an attack on Australia is considered an Attack on USA.

The Americans have a lot of assets in Australia, and the 2 governments are pretty much joined at the hip because of their cultural ties which are extensive. They are basically one Germano/Irish people.

Do you know what America is gonna do?

They’re just gonna make a few fiery UN speeches and then sit back and evaluate Russian long range capabilities, and then life goes on and you won’t be missed! <-- :lol:


Yes I do know.

We have fought in every war together. literally, every war going back 60 years.

As I was saying, relations between America and Australia are far closer than they are with the UK. They even funded Sinn fein together (IRA) and the connections are very deeply entrenched.

You will then look have to analyse our long range capabilities but Pootin would be dead too.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 20971
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests