The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


How Would The RoC Support Turkish Cypriots If They pissed

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Postby zan » Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:11 am

humanist wrote:i am not talking to you as a child, i am talking as cypriot where turkey does not have a place. and i am rather confused as to what you want, if you like turkey and want to be turkish that is fine i am sure they have an immigration policy. you can still be turk and live in a fre cyprus too. may be not now but once a solution is reached you can live in cyprus and still feel your turkish blood. but do it legally and fair.



There is nothing illegal about the TRNC but that which is a point of law. The EU and the UN have stated that as a point of law yes it is illegal but on the grounds of circumstance inevitability. The GC propaganda machine has managed to win the legal side but the moral side has started to elude them and go over to the side of the right. There is no moral ground for the upheaval of hundreds of thousands of people to a dubious legality.
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby humanist » Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:28 am

Zan are you serious man? you are occupying property that does not belong to yu, some thugs from turkey came in, killed and savaged and took land from people and you aliving in it and you are telling me there is no ethical issue here. please

i cannot believe you cannot move a little ithin your thinking to see that what was done to you and your family in the 1960's happened to another groups of people 10 years later.

none is right. so we both experienced the same thing so lets change it.
User avatar
humanist
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:46 am

Postby humanist » Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:34 am

Zan could I put this forth and please tell me what you think.

My parents in their 60's have a home in the south, my grandmother and her daughter were living in it till 1998 at which point they got a grant from governemnt as refugees to build a home on a pice of land they owned in the south. in about 2002 somone approached us to rent the home to a romanian family. this family are now refusing to move out, as my parents would like to retire back in cyprus, is it right that they are not moving out and are saying that they will stay in the house forever?

you opinion on this will be appreciated
User avatar
humanist
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:46 am

Postby zan » Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:42 am

humanist wrote:Zan could I put this forth and please tell me what you think.

My parents in their 60's have a home in the south, my grandmother and her daughter were living in it till 1998 at which point they got a grant from governemnt as refugees to build a home on a pice of land they owned in the south. in about 2002 somone approached us to rent the home to a romanian family. this family are now refusing to move out, as my parents would like to retire back in cyprus, is it right that they are not moving out and are saying that they will stay in the house forever?

you opinion on this will be appreciated


Depends on the contract. If the same thing were to happen in England and the people have been living there for more than six months and have had a contract that was made for a period longer than six months then they are considered sitting tenants and as long as they want to stay and are paying the rent then they can stay. Simple as that. This was to ensure that like the landlords of old, people were not made homeless just because the landlord wanted to sell the property and move on. This used to happen a lot in the old days.


As for the Cyprus situation there can be no comparison in the situation.
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby humanist » Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:51 am

thank you very much for your response, though I am of the view that legal does not always mean ethical and the only people who benefit from legalities ...... yes you guessed it lawyers.

on that note am going to da beach ita a nice day down under ........... chat to you all later.
User avatar
humanist
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:46 am

Postby zan » Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:58 am

humanist wrote:thank you very much for your response, though I am of the view that legal does not always mean ethical and the only people who benefit from legalities ...... yes you guessed it lawyers.

on that note am going to da beach ita a nice day down under ........... chat to you all later.


Zan wrote:
There is nothing illegal about the TRNC but that which is a point of law. The EU and the UN have stated that as a point of law yes it is illegal but on the grounds of circumstance inevitability. The GC propaganda machine has managed to win the legal side but the moral side has started to elude them and go over to the side of the right. There is no moral ground for the upheaval of hundreds of thousands of people to a dubious legality.


I think we are singing from the same song book here Humanist. Have a nice day on the beach.
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Previous

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests