Armenian genocide resolution

Post new topic  Reply to topic
Cyprus Forum » Politics and Elections Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:03 am Reply with quote
T_C
lecturer
lecturer
 
Joined: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 2582
Location: London


phoenix wrote:
Turkey turning to Israel as its only supporter in its failure to accept responsibility for the genocide. It's a crying shame that a nation that has suffered the Holocaust should be helping this denial.

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article3101947.ece


Well maybe their stance should tell you something! Wink

The Armenians have shot themselves on the foot by CONSTANTLY putting forth bogus evidence such as the "hitler quote".....if there was to be some sort of investigation, the Armenians ASWELL AS Turkey would be exposed and have a lot to answer for, hence why Turkey always says "lets investigate" knowing full well the Armenians will NEVER accept as it would raise doubts on the Armenian story.

Most people agree it was genocide, no amount of resolutions are going to bring these people back. Its time people moved on.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:06 am Reply with quote
shahmaran
lecturer
lecturer
 
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 2876


DT. wrote:
shahmaran wrote:
Of course, everyone does. But how that is achieved is another matter.


what would be the correct method in your mind to accompish their self determination..which appears to be an independant state?


I could not say.

I guess the "correct method" depends on which side you are looking from.

Unfortunately we live in an unfair world where the "correct method" is relevant to whom is superior. Which usually leaves the oppressed having to resort to "incorrect methods"
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:18 am Reply with quote
DT.
professor
professor
 
Joined: 12 Nov 2006
Posts: 4534
Location: Ethnically cleansed from Morphou


shahmaran wrote:
DT. wrote:
shahmaran wrote:
Of course, everyone does. But how that is achieved is another matter.


what would be the correct method in your mind to accompish their self determination..which appears to be an independant state?


I could not say.

I guess the "correct method" depends on which side you are looking from.

Unfortunately we live in an unfair world where the "correct method" is relevant to whom is superior. Which usually leaves the oppressed having to resort to "incorrect methods"


excellent response Shah. I have a whole new respect for you.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:18 am Reply with quote
shahmaran
lecturer
lecturer
 
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 2876


Well thank you Smile

I suppose a Kurdish state within the borders of Iraq is one realistic possibility, but i cannot see how it will be allowed nor if it will be a sufficient enough solution that would serve the interests of all the Kurds who are scattered around such a large area which crosses so many borders.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:38 am Reply with quote
miltiades
professor
professor
 
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 6155
Location: UK


shahmaran wrote:
DT. wrote:
shahmaran wrote:
Of course, everyone does. But how that is achieved is another matter.


what would be the correct method in your mind to accompish their self determination..which appears to be an independant state?


I could not say.

I guess the "correct method" depends on which side you are looking from.

Unfortunately we live in an unfair world where the "correct method" is relevant to whom is superior. Which usually leaves the oppressed having to resort to "incorrect methods"

A very profound statement , didn't think you were capable of such superb and wise thoughts .Well done Shah .
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:34 pm Reply with quote
DT.
professor
professor
 
Joined: 12 Nov 2006
Posts: 4534
Location: Ethnically cleansed from Morphou


miltiades wrote:
shahmaran wrote:
DT. wrote:
shahmaran wrote:
Of course, everyone does. But how that is achieved is another matter.


what would be the correct method in your mind to accompish their self determination..which appears to be an independant state?


I could not say.

I guess the "correct method" depends on which side you are looking from.

Unfortunately we live in an unfair world where the "correct method" is relevant to whom is superior. Which usually leaves the oppressed having to resort to "incorrect methods"

A very profound statement , didn't think you were capable of such superb and wise thoughts .Well done Shah .


Laughing say the truth Shah...you're a little bit worried now aren't you? Laughing
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:00 pm Reply with quote
shahmaran
lecturer
lecturer
 
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 2876


Laughing Laughing

More skeptical then worried Razz
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:05 pm Reply with quote
denizaksulu
vip
vip
 
Joined: 10 May 2007
Posts: 11039
Location: London, Ethnically Cleansed from Anglisidhes since 1963


shahmaran wrote:
Its a crying shame that the whole matter is being exploited in such a way


As they say Shahmaran, "thine enemy is my friend". Don expect mercy from these people.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 4:27 pm Reply with quote
EPSILON
instructor
instructor
 
Joined: 18 May 2007
Posts: 801
Location: ATHENS


karma wrote:
I really wonder why nobody cares about the turkish people killed by british, french, italians, greeks, armenians and others during 1914-1922...
it really sounds wierd and unfair.


Question stupid.!!!! Correction question should be: how many civilians British, Greeks,Armenians killed during 1914-1922?

A genocide can not based on the number of soldiers of the enemy (both sides) were killed. A genocide is based on the number of civilians an army is killed during a war . A genocide is based on how much unhuman the politicians/army of a country was during a war.

This is what Turks do not understand because in their internal affairs neither the life of a Turkish soldier is count neither the life of a civilian- The only scope / target is Turkey to win (Actually not Turkey but generals)

This is generaly the problem of the majority of Turkish people they can not separate actions/things - they learned only black and white coulors-nothing else. This of course is not the point of a democratic state/population
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 7:30 pm Reply with quote
denizaksulu
vip
vip
 
Joined: 10 May 2007
Posts: 11039
Location: London, Ethnically Cleansed from Anglisidhes since 1963


EPSILON wrote:
karma wrote:
I really wonder why nobody cares about the turkish people killed by british, french, italians, greeks, armenians and others during 1914-1922...
it really sounds wierd and unfair.


Question stupid.!!!! Correction question should be: how many civilians British, Greeks,Armenians killed during 1914-1922?

A genocide can not based on the number of soldiers of the enemy (both sides) were killed. A genocide is based on the number of civilians an army is killed during a war . A genocide is based on how much unhuman the politicians/army of a country was during a war.

This is what Turks do not understand because in their internal affairs neither the life of a Turkish soldier is count neither the life of a civilian- The only scope / target is Turkey to win (Actually not Turkey but generals)

This is generaly the problem of the majority of Turkish people they can not separate actions/things - they learned only black and white coulors-nothing else. This of course is not the point of a democratic state/population



This description of your, that Turkey only sees Black or White is a true description of most GCs on this forum. Anything or anybody remotely connected to Turkey is Black and everybody else is White. Right? This is Racism , Period.
Post new topic  Reply to topic All times are GMT + 3 Hours
Page 9 of 12  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Cyprus Forum » Politics and Elections


Cyprus Events

 

Copyright © 2002-2008 Cyprus-Forum.com