Right of Return versus Bizonality
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 8:14 pm
From what I have gathered so far, it seems that GCs focus all their efforts on achieving the "right of return" after a settlement, whereas GCs focus on achieving "bizonality". I am sure you all know what I mean by these terms.
By-passing for a moment the issue of whether "bizonality" and "right of return" are good things or not, right things or not, I wanted to pose the following question: Is it actually possible to simultaneously satisfy these two demands, or will we inevitably end up with a "GC popular-TC unpopular" plan or "TC popular-GC unpopular" plan?
What I am looking for in this thread, is proposals about how both these concerns can somehow be satisfied. Please avoid general discussions of the type "There should be no bizonality" or "Refugees shouldn't be allowed to return at all".
By-passing for a moment the issue of whether "bizonality" and "right of return" are good things or not, right things or not, I wanted to pose the following question: Is it actually possible to simultaneously satisfy these two demands, or will we inevitably end up with a "GC popular-TC unpopular" plan or "TC popular-GC unpopular" plan?
What I am looking for in this thread, is proposals about how both these concerns can somehow be satisfied. Please avoid general discussions of the type "There should be no bizonality" or "Refugees shouldn't be allowed to return at all".