Sotos,
I agree with you about the problem of creating the videos. First of all, videocameras are very expensive. I don't have one, but I hope to in a couple of years. Secondly, it takes some "know-how" in order to put together a good video - regardless of its opinion. If one is inexperienced with video editing, it helps to have a friend who is a media specialist and who can assist. Otherwise, the quality will undoubtedly look poor, even if the opinion is balanced.
Now regarding the production of balanced videos, that too is an important question. There are unbalanced videos out there for sure, but I hope that most of us are critical thinkers who can smell a flaw when it exists. If not, there are others who can, and they can post their comments on a video blog such as Youtube and demand that the producer create a more balanced piece. Otherwise, those negative comments will serve as red flags for the rest of us.
There may not be a lot of people who are willing to pay for the production of balanced videos - and
am.i.will did indeed make a good point. A lot of the stuff out there is junk. The worthwhile videos may make up more than 1% of the total number available, but it is quite low. A video producer, hoping to be taken seriously with a proposal, would be wise to finish up the presentation with an exhaustive review of possible flaws. Some comments can be made as to how solutions to those potential flaws are being thought out, but anyone who comes in with a proposal while saying that it is "Guaranteed to work! 100% !!" is a "quack" who is full of hot air, also known as b.s.
In thinking about the school I have proposed, it literally tires me to sit and think about all of its potential flaws. I feel really vulnerable when I think about some parts that have less than a 50% chance of working, but I take to heart that it will make me look a lot more credible in the public's eye if I can stand up and point these out and then point out what I am doing to work around them.
A good book that describes how to look at one's ideas for the future and then systematically critique it is Douglas Raybeck's
Looking Down the Road : A Systems Approach to Futures Studies. I have to give the disclaimer here that this man taught at my college and that I probably would not have discovered it otherwise. But it is interesting; it is also depressing to think of all the ways to find weaknesses in one's creative proposals. However, the two sides of our brains need to work together - the right side creates and the left side critiques.
This is the description of the book from
www.amazon.com . "The ability to look ahead and to treat abstractions as serious business is a skill we all need to cultivate. So states the author of Looking Down the Road, a compelling short work involving the grand, if frustrating, human preoccupation with prediction. Raybeck supplies readers with some of the tools and ideas they will need as they attempt to forecast developments that are apt to characterize future society. Looking Down the Road reflects the author's anthropological training as it seeks to elucidate some of the processes and pressures that create social and cultural change."
I suggest that anyone trying to create a balanced video first read this book and be prepared to use it in order to effectively point out both sides of the issue.
Love your avatar by the way, Sotos.
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:04 am
