The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


First Supreme Court case to be heard in Turkish

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

First Supreme Court case to be heard in Turkish

Postby brother » Wed Feb 09, 2005 4:49 pm

First Supreme Court case to be heard in Turkish
Property challenge for CYP 1.6 mln

Financial Mirror Online
Wednesday,  February 09,  2005, 14.00

A Turkish Cypriot family living in the north has made an appeal to the Supreme Court, by using its constitutional right to be heard in Turkish.

This is the first time that a case has been filed in Turkish, particularly using the classical legal terminology that is heavily dependent on Arabic words.

AntennaTV reported last night that the plaintiffs would have to testify through a translator and may even demand the right to be heard by a Turkish Cypriot judge, or at least by a mixed panel of judges as was the norm in the earlier years of the Republic of Cyprus.

This is expected to become a landmark case and open a Pandora’s Box for any other future challenges by Turkish Cypriots resorting to their constitutional right to be heard and tried in their own language.

The case, that was submitted yesterday with the first hearing set for March 9, is challenging the forced appropriation of the family land in Polemidhia, presently worth an estimated CYP 1,598,000.

The plaintiffs inherited the land from Ali Kiamil who died in Nicosia General Hospital on December 25, 2002 and are suing the Ministry of Interior’s Turkish Cypriot Property Board on the grounds of political, racial and religious discrimination, as well as violation of their human rights.

They charge that due to reasons beyond their control they abandoned their family property after the Turkish invasion in 1974 and have since lived in the north.

In the 6-page writ of summons secured by the Financial Mirror, the plaintiffs claim that the state refused to recognise their right to their inheritance and often refer to the 1960 constitution that should have safeguarded their legal rights. They also refer to their basic rights according to E.U. laws and protocols.
User avatar
brother
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby turkcyp » Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:03 pm

deleted by the author...
Last edited by turkcyp on Wed Aug 03, 2005 5:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
turkcyp
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 12:40 am

Postby magikthrill » Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:58 pm

I'm not sure this is a bad thing. Good for them for doing this. Can the RoC screw them over though by postponing and elongating the trial thus making it more expensive, or does it not work that way?
magikthrill
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2245
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:09 am
Location: Athens, Greece

Postby turkcyp » Wed Feb 09, 2005 9:14 pm

deleted by the author...
Last edited by turkcyp on Wed Aug 03, 2005 5:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
turkcyp
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 12:40 am

Postby brother » Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:02 pm

I think it will turn the cypiot politics on its head and force all cypriot politicians to think about a solution sooner than later.
User avatar
brother
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby Piratis » Thu Feb 10, 2005 9:56 pm

Turcyp, lets say both GCs and TCs win their cases in the ECHR, do you think that the court rulings can be enforced only against RoC and not against Turkey at the same time?

Turkey has to be aligned to ECHR rulings as much as Cyprus especially now that Turkey wants to be part of the EU.

and by the way, I say Turkey, not "TRNC" because the ECHR has already concluded that the "TRNC" is a subordinate administration of Turkey, and has already convicted Turkey itself, and not the "TRNC".
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby boulio » Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:31 pm

and by the way, I say Turkey, not "TRNC" because the ECHR has already concluded that the "TRNC" is a subordinate administration of Turkey, and has already convicted Turkey itself, and not the "TRNC".

exactly
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby insan » Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:44 pm

Turcyp, lets say both GCs and TCs win their cases in the ECHR, do you think that the court rulings can be enforced only against RoC and not against Turkey at the same time?

Turkey has to be aligned to ECHR rulings as much as Cyprus especially now that Turkey wants to be part of the EU.

and by the way, I say Turkey, not "TRNC" because the ECHR has already concluded that the "TRNC" is a subordinate administration of Turkey, and has already convicted Turkey itself, and not the "TRNC".



I totally agree with you on this issue, Piratis.
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby turkcyp » Fri Feb 11, 2005 8:36 am

deleted by the author...
turkcyp
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 12:40 am


Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests