As I have said I am willing to take 1 while they are taking 3, but I am not willing to loose 1 while they are gaining.
- Disproportional share on executive body is not fair. By amending this provision into proportional to population ratio, we make it fair. Thus, we made it rational and gained the trust of other side while they gained one of the unfairly restricted rights. But if you tell other side "I accept the reduction of my executive share to be reduced to the population ratio of TC community"; other side will tell you "Do you think I'm stupid or what? Your executive share should have already been proportional to population ratio." And they will hate you more than before because of you were trying to cheat them. A kind of common cheat law.
- Political equality is a must because TCs need a real time protection system in political structure to guard their interests, effectively participate on decision making on every issue they have interests or concerns. Otherwise there's no need for TC participation in Senate. For everything we convict that unfair for us, we can go supreme court or ECHR. We rot our lives at the doors of Supreme Court and ECHR. This is completely absurd. Our name will be "politically equal" constituent community but we won't have the right to effectively participate on every decision that we too have interests or concerns. This is irrational and is not viable. GC community should genuinely acknowledge the "political equality" of two communities. In return, they will gain our trust. Moreover we will both gain a viable political structure.
All other issues also can easily be solved on rationale and legal basis dimension.
