The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


COLD TURKEY

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

COLD TURKEY

Postby brother » Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:04 pm

COLD TURKEY
By Arnaud de Borchgrave
-----------------------------------------------------------
No one noticed as Turkey, an erstwhile ally, nabbed the gold medal recently in the global anti-American stakes.

Those with the most negative views of the Bush administration's policies are (1) Turks with 82 percent; (2) Indonesians, 81 percent; (3) Lebanese, 80 percent; (4) Argentines, 79 percent; (5) Brazilians, 78 percent. Mercifully, half the 22,000 people surveyed in 21 countries by the BBC around the world did not agree, "America's influence on the world is very negative."

For those who see thousands of demonstrators in Beirut excoriating Syria as pro-American voices for freedom, think again. In Egypt, far more people are angry with President Hosni Mubarak for his close alliance with the United States than for denying them their political freedom.

After reading a long list of lies and distortions published by the Turkish media, the gold medal is hardly surprising. From left to right, and from centrist to Islamist, the United States is raked over hot coals with odious comparisons to Nazi Germany.

The Middle East Media Research Institute has once again scored in bringing to our attention trends our mainstream media have ignored. It is difficult to detect the difference between what Osama bin Laden said in his 19 audio and videotapes since September 11, 2001, and what some Turkish journalists write. If anything, the Turks outvenom bin Laden.

Columnist Suleyman Arif Emre wrote in the pan-Islamist daily Milli Gazette: "As we know, Germany's Hitler started World War II, and about 50 million people perished because of his ambitions. Bush is America's Hitler. Like Hitler, he too has become a curse for the world. If the world's sensible leaders don't unite against Bush to stop him, a great number of people will die because of his ambitions."

"Bush," the venomous Turk continued, "who is an ally of the Zionists, belongs to the racist philosophy too. The beliefs of Bush's evangelical church coupled with Jewish racism, which exceeds Hitler's, are sufficient proof that the 'Sharon-Bush duo' is militants of the same fanatical philosophy. Hitler said he would establish a new order if Germany won. Bush is after similar invasions."

Following Afghanistan and Iraq, President Bush's map of invasions, Mr. Emre says, includes 22 additional Islamic countries. How did he reach this figure? Because Mr. Bush is carrying out a 5,000-year-old Zionist dream to conquer everything between the valleys of the Nile and Euphrates. Mr. Bush has already "blurted out the names of Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia and Egypt."

Nuray Mert, another columnist for the center-left liberal daily Radikal, described Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as "one of the leading architects of the American project to push the world into chaos and carry it out in the most barbaric way." Burhan Bozgeyik, in Milli Gazette, added the Bush administration is in the hands of the worst enemies of Islam. Their hate is so deep no amount of Muslim blood (spilled by them) satisfies them ... even hundreds of thousands of dead seem little for them."

The "evil triangle" -- the U.S., U.K. and Israel -- whose "hatred for Muslims has reached the point of madness, pretends to be Turkey's ally, but in fact it is weakening her foundations and planning to destroy her. ... The so-called 'elections' were nothing but the first step toward dividing Iraq."

This would be hilarious if not for the incontrovertible fact it is believed not only by Islamist extremists but by countless millions of Muslim fundamentalists, including all who subscribe to Wahhabi tenets. And we only have ourselves to blame.

America's public policy voice is pathetically defensive. It lacks credibility. Even Al Hurrah, the federally funded U.S. satellite feed to the Arab world has at times sounded too critical of the Bush administration. This, monitors reported back to Pentagon inquiries, was "to gain credibility."

Burhan Ozfatura, a former mayor of Izmir and a columnist for the business daily Dunya, writes, "It is my sincere belief ... the U.S. is run by an incompetent, very aggressive, true enemy of Islam, brainwashed with evangelical nonsense, a bloodthirsty team that is a loyal link in Israel's command-and-control system." The United States, he concludes, is the "biggest danger for Turkey, today and in the future."

Anti-Americanism is a relatively new phenomenon in Turkey. Throughout the 1990s in Turkey, 60 percent of the people had favorable views about the U.S. and its policies. The 2003 Iraq war closed many minds. The mood began souring with the advent of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Islamist-leaning ruling party.

The low point came when the Turkish parliament rejected the U.S. plan to open a northern front against Iraq. A $6 billion sweetener plus more billions in credit didn't change any minds. The U.S. 4th Infantry Division that was to spearhead the northern offensive was confined to the troopships offshore. Eventually, they sailed around the Arabian Peninsula and entered Iraq from Kuwait.

Turkish paranoia fed suspicions the United States wishes to create an independent and oil-rich Kurdish state. Turkish journalists convinced themselves, in turn, that Turkey's restive Kurds would then try to secede.

Mr. Bush has reassured Mr. Erdogan time and again the United States is firmly committed to Iraq's territorial integrity. But time and again, disinformation about U.S. intentions resurfaces courtesy of the wild bunch in the Turkish media.

Turkey's bid to join the European Union has also lost momentum over Ankara's reluctance to recognize Cyprus, an island nation Turkish troops invaded in 1974 to block a Greek Cypriot coup that sought union with Greece. EU says it's a sine qua non. The Turks still occupy the northern third of Cyprus.

Negotiations for EU membership are expected to take 10 to 15 years -- and the first session isn't scheduled till next Oct. 3.


Arnaud de Borchgrave is editor at large of The Washington Times and of United Press International.
User avatar
brother
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby andytandreou » Fri Mar 18, 2005 12:09 pm

extreamly interesting story. It is somewhat borderline "conspiracy theorist" however some issues are hard to ignore, like USA's relentless support of Israel and flourishing Jewish culture. I am starting to see the USA as a jewish country and they consistenly show that they are more Jewish than Christian. I really don't have any figures about this but SURLEY there are more hispanics in the US than jews... So what on earth is going on with the Jewish "advertising" on all US media, movies, radio, shows etc...? Many more things are wrong with the USA but i do believe each country has a few skeletons in its closet!
andytandreou
Member
Member
 
Posts: 186
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 2:58 pm
Location: Larnaka

Postby brother » Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:15 pm

Like you i found this article very interesting and it does border on conspiracy theory but it states so many decent facts it had me wondering about the u.s and israel friendship and their plans for the middle east and us poor cypriots who no doubt will always be a pawn in their games for world domination.
User avatar
brother
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby BigDutch » Fri Mar 18, 2005 1:30 pm

I also agree - interesting article. I`m not aligned to any religion. but I also find the US foreign policy very worrying.
BigDutch
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 11:35 pm
Location: Paphos

Postby insan » Fri Mar 18, 2005 11:27 pm

It's all about give and take. The ones who give USA what it wants gets what they want. The ones who have power to stop USA can stop her, at least for a while.
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby Realist » Sat Mar 19, 2005 1:14 pm

I don't think anyone can stop the USA.

Does anyone know of the plans to build some big US military base in Cyprus?

I didn't think there was any room left with all the different armies already here.
Realist
Member
Member
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2005 3:13 am

Postby brother » Sat Mar 19, 2005 1:18 pm

realsit i have not heard that one before, can you tell where they plan to build it and who gave consent to this?
User avatar
brother
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby Saint Jimmy » Sat Mar 19, 2005 4:24 pm

brother wrote:realsit i have not heard that one before, can you tell where they plan to build it and who gave consent to this?

And what do the Brits have to say on that? They'd become redundant in such a case, right? And, lap-dogs or not, the Americans know that the British are pretty much all they've got on their side on the international chess-board...
User avatar
Saint Jimmy
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1067
Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 1:29 pm
Location: Leeds, U.K.

Postby brother » Mon Mar 21, 2005 2:44 pm

Well said jimmy, but always remember that the brits have a commitment to the e.u also.
User avatar
brother
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby cannedmoose » Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:03 pm

Saint Jimmy wrote:
brother wrote:realsit i have not heard that one before, can you tell where they plan to build it and who gave consent to this?

And what do the Brits have to say on that? They'd become redundant in such a case, right? And, lap-dogs or not, the Americans know that the British are pretty much all they've got on their side on the international chess-board...


Jimmy, I doubt the UK government would be greatly perturbed by a US presence, given the different purposes that the US would want from any such base. It is likely that any hypothetical US base would be either a naval station or an airbase, rather than a sophisticated spy facility. The British bases main purpose these days is more logistical than as a strategic point from which to exert influence (what influence?). More importantly, the OTH radar installations are still crucial parts of the integrated global spy network - shared by the US, UK and others, allowing us to continue intercepting radio traffic across the Middle East and continue monitoring the traditional nuclear test sites in Central Asia and Western China.

So, if the Americans want to build a big and brash base in Cyprus, thus diverting the gaze of protestors from the SBAs, I don't see the UK standing in the way, and I don't think the US would seek to duplicate the existing facilities from which it already derives so much information.
User avatar
cannedmoose
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4279
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: England

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests