-mikkie2- wrote:A 'bad' agreed solution can be changed for the better later.
A 'worst' solution, of waiting and waiting until the geopolitical scene in the middle east changes and balance of power shifts is like pissing in the wind. We need a solution NOW, not in 10, 20 or 30 years time when we will have a million Turks in the north bursting at the seams.
Mikkie, you seem to be confused by the wording.
What is a solution? A solution is what solves a problem.
A so called "bad solution" like the Annan plan, in fact is not a solution at all, since not only it didn't solve the problem, but it would make it bigger and more complicated.
When was the last time that an agreement was changed in our favor? Or you trying to give to the Turks another excuse to start troubles again like they did in 63?
If the balance of power will need to change once to get what is legally ours it will need to change 10 times as much to get what will by that time be legally Turkish because we were stupid enough to sign away our rights and land to them.
Not only that, but if we accept something like the Annan plan we will not even have a voice internationaly. We will have some "constituent state" made out of 2/3rd of Cyprus, officially partitioned from the by then legal "trnc" (under a different name), and we will just be loosely associated to each other by some foreign controlled "central government" which of course will never support our struggle for justice since TCs will be able to block every such effort. So not even our country would support us since we would have no control over it, even if we are the 82% of the population!
And while our problem will be bigger than ever, the UN, EU and everybody else will of course consider the Cyprus Problem as solved. So if we even say "Hey, you know this is unfair and we want it changed" they will just laugh on our face and tell us that the Cyprus Problem is now solved, and if there was something we didn't like we shouldn't have agreed to it.