Kikapu wrote:The settlers are brought to the "TRNC" for one reason and one reason only, whether peace or no peace, partition or no partition, reconciliation or no reconciliation. They are there to take away the voice (vote) of the TC's and place it in the hands of the Turks. Either the Turks will use their majority voice to vote the way they want to vote to bring about a settlement that gives them the best chance to get into the EU, or worse case scenario, Turks will be the rulers over the TC's in the North, if Turkey does not get into the EU. If the latter one happens, in some years in the future, there will be memorial walking paths and trails named after the the TC's who once lived on the island of Cyprus, much like the Trails we have for the
Kickapoo (Kikapoo, Kikapu) Indian tribes in the Southwestern USA, who have mostly long vanished from the face of the Earth due to the arrival of the Settlers from Europe, and now only a few thousand are remaining.

Nikitas wrote:To Copperline and Zan regarding their comments above.
A policy of colonisation is evident on the ground. Bringing people over and settling them in GC properties is one such piece of evidence. Another is the political organization of settlers and their active part in TRNC politics. Do not take my word for it, read statements and articles by concerned TC politicians who know the situation better than any of us in this forum.
In any future solution when the populations will be concentrated in one side of the island there is a real risk of a race problem between TCs and mainland Turks, as well as problems between the mainlanders themselves. There is no need to import these problems in Cyprus.
Those who advocate the legalisation of settlers are not communicating with the Cypriot in themeselves. Just imagine how you would feel dealing with the Federal buraucracy if the employee you are talking to is not a Cypriot but a mainland Greek or mainland Turk. Does that make you feel as a citizen of an independent and free nation? And how about seeing nationals of both mainlands being eligible for elected office and perhaps elected.
Those who say the above examples do not bother them are either not Cypriots or they have reached a level of cosmopolitan thinking which obviously escapes me.
Assuming I am alive and in possession of my faculties when a solution comes about, and that solution grants any kind of privilieges to settlers of any nationality over and above what Cypriots get, I will go to court for it. My demand will be equal treatment with settlers and I do believe I will win my case. There is an element of anti Cypriot discrimination in provisions made for settlers and I am surprised that Cypriots of any community cannot see it.


...and that solution grants any kind of privilieges to settlers of any nationality over and above what Cypriots get, I will go to court for it. My demand will be equal treatment with settlers ...

CopperLine wrote:
Kikapu You give the example of issuing a driving licence as a test of the 'stateness' of a country. I'm not sure driving licences are good examples regarding recognition of a state and a distinct jurisdiction, so let's take something fundamental like marriage certificates or birth certificates. For those who say because TRNC is not recognised as a country/state then its jurisdiction including law-setting powers which includes citizenship tests are also not recognised, they are mistaken. If you got married in TRNC or had a baby born in TRNC then those certificates issued by the ostensibly unrecognised TRNC are STILL RECOGNISED by other jurisdictions and other states.

zan wrote:
Kikapu, we have done what we had to do in order to survive the siege and that is the end of the story. Now a ready and sustainable population is needed for our continued success and we will do what is necessary again. Your thick head will not listen to what is going on around the world as far as sustaining a country for the long term is concerned and whether it is just short sightedness, nostalgia or plain propaganda on your part it is just as annoying. Do you think that the "RoC" is the same place as it was twenty years ago. My sister crossed over last year and said she could not wait to get back because she thought she left Haringey behind in the UK. Not that I care what goes on there but the quite sleepy villages with donkey drawn carts are no more my friend...Long live the future.

Kikapu wrote:CopperLine wrote:
Kikapu You give the example of issuing a driving licence as a test of the 'stateness' of a country. I'm not sure driving licences are good examples regarding recognition of a state and a distinct jurisdiction, so let's take something fundamental like marriage certificates or birth certificates. For those who say because TRNC is not recognised as a country/state then its jurisdiction including law-setting powers which includes citizenship tests are also not recognised, they are mistaken. If you got married in TRNC or had a baby born in TRNC then those certificates issued by the ostensibly unrecognised TRNC are STILL RECOGNISED by other jurisdictions and other states.
CopperLine,
My use of the Drivers Licence point was to illustrate, that having a fake drivers licence created by me is not going to work when there is already a legal driving licence system in operation. The "TRNC" may want to act like my fake driving licence, [color=red]but will not be recognised by other authorities,[/color] hence the fact that the "TRNC" is not recognised as a country by the World, because it is a "fake drivers licence". By you using the marriage and birth certificates in the "TRNC" being recognised by others is hardly relevant. No body denies that TC's live or exists in the "TRNC". I have used a birth certificate issued by the "TRNC" when I applied for my US citizenship many years ago, even though I was not born in the "TRNC", but rather in Cyprus, so that is not the point. Adjustments are made to minimize certain problems to the TC's that are politically based, so not to hinder their day to day life. Same time, two astronauts could have gotten married on the moon, or the space station or on a cruise ship in the middle of the ocean, and their marriage would still count in the eyes of the world, despite all those events taking place in NO country at all, recognised or not. It is not intended to deny individual TC's anything by the world, but rather denying a "state" within a State that is acting illegally in the formation of that "state" and then try claiming to be or wanting to be legal, by asking the International community to recognise them. So, individuals are recognised as TC's even if they live in a illegal state, but the illegal state is not recognised as a country.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests