Bananiot wrote:I know of another idiot who adopted the views of Denktash, however, this is not the issue here. I think what Tim is trying to tell us is that there is still hope since there are people who can make a rational evaluation of the events of the past and what the nationalist minotaur did to us.
Of course, in order to make a rational evaluation one needs to be clear as to exactly what happened and why. In a different thread, Nikitas basically says that we started killing each other because we got bored. Piratis, on the other hand likes to take into account all the rounds, as though this is a boxing match the outcome of which needs to be decided.
In reality, it is much simpler. The latest round, which happened in our lifetime, started because of our burning ambition to unite Cyprus with Greece. Till then, Turkey was not even a factor in the Cypriot equation. I have said before that it was our right to pursue this but once we established the strong objection by the Turkish Cypriot community to our stated aim, we should have revised it in order to accommodate the future of the Turkish Cypriot community. Our nationalist lust prevented us from doing this and any voices to the contrary were quickly silenced by the great patriots.
Our bad luck was that Turkish nationalism proved superior to ours, but we should have realised this before committing the grave mistakes that resulted in the undoing of our country as we knew it.
You are absolutely right Bananiot
BUT at the time ENOSIS was seen as providing security for GCs and you cannot simply ignore the deep rooted fear the majority of Cypriots had for Turkey. It's wrong to view what happened in Cyprus in isolation, you have to take account of the population exchanges and ethnic cleansing that took place a few decades earlier, union with Greece would, it was hoped, prevent that. With this in mind some TCs figured that partition was the only solution, they were even prepared to sacrifice some of their own to achieve this. The unworkable 1960 constitution meant that eventually one side would have to win, do we have a winner or will the international community recognise the unfairness of Zurich and let democracy and adherence to the UN Charter prevail?