The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Apostolides v. Orams - Judgment from the ECJ

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Apostolides v. Orams - Judgment from the ECJ

Postby Get Real! » Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:30 am

From the Court of Justice of the European Communities

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber)
28 April 2009

Meletis Apostolides v. David Charles Orams, Linda Elizabeth Orams

(Once you run the link below, click on the top-most “C420/07” on the left of the screen)

http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/f ... mit=Submit


Huge link! :roll:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 42800
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby miltiades » Wed Apr 29, 2009 6:53 am

Without a shadow of a doubt the most profound judgement which has sent shivers down the spine of those Brits who ignored International laws driven on by their ignorance and their couldn't give a shit attitude. Britain no longer rules the waves Europe does .

1. The suspension of the application of the acquis communautaire in those areas of the Republic of Cyprus in which the Government of that Member State does not exercise effective control, provided for by Article 1(1) of Protocol No 10 on Cyprus to the Act concerning the conditions of accession [to the European Union] of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, does not preclude the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters to a judgment which is given by a Cypriot court sitting in the area of the island effectively controlled by the Cypriot Government, but concerns land situated in areas not so controlled.

2. Article 35(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 does not authorise the court of a Member State to refuse recognition or enforcement of a judgment given by the courts of another Member State concerning land situated in an area of the latter State over which its Government does not exercise effective control.

3. The fact that a judgment given by the courts of a Member State, concerning land situated in an area of that State over which its Government does not exercise effective control, cannot, as a practical matter, be enforced where the land is situated does not constitute a ground for refusal of recognition or enforcement under Article 34(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 and it does not mean that such a judgment is unenforceable for the purposes of Article 38(1) of that regulation.

4. The recognition or enforcement of a default judgment cannot be refused under Article 34(2) of Regulation No 44/2001 where the defendant was able to commence proceedings to challenge the default judgment and those proceedings enabled him to argue that he had not been served with the document which instituted the proceedings or with the equivalent document in sufficient time and in such a way as to enable him to arrange for his defence.

[Signatures]
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18082
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby polis » Wed Apr 29, 2009 8:31 am

You can also get the judgment here:

For the text in English: http://www.cylaw.org/62007J0420ENHTML.htm
For the text in Greek: http://www.cylaw.org/62007J0420ENHTML.htm
polis
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:44 pm
Location: Cyprus


Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests