Imagine the scenario where we followed the 1960 Constitution of the RoC, happily without conflicts, and the TC population grew healthily but the GC population plummeted significantly, altering the demographic proportions.
Would the TCs still be happy to preserve the 70:30 ratio of GC:TC with one GC President and one TC Vice-President?
Let us say the population of TCs had grown tenfold from the original ~100,000 to say 1000,000; whereas, the GC population had reduced to 100,000. Yet, the 100,000 GCs would still maintain entitlement to a President and 56 Representatives ruling the country alongside only 24 Representatives elected by the TC community who are now stuck with just a Vice President.
1. At what point in the demographic distribution of the two communities would such separation of power have appeared ridiculous to the TC community?
2. At what point in the population ratios would the TCs have actively devised an "Akritas" style plan to make the ridiculous 1960 Constitution fairer?
[Please leave Enosis and Taksim out of this. Everyone was happy to stay united and independent.]