The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive actions

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby Mustiejodu » Sat Apr 05, 2014 2:33 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:
Mustiejodu wrote:I have seen a lot of comments on this site about turkey invading eu waters ,turkey flying over eu air space or turkey sailing boats in eu waters etc etc . Why does no one actually take any action ? Has anyone ever questioned the actions of the eu or USA or uk. Over this matter. Why do they not raise this with turkey and why does this never bother turkey. The reason is very simple and once you look at the logical side to this and not get bogged down with the local politics you will see the bigger picture. When turkey states it's there as a peace keeping operation there is actually a twisted truth to her presence. I will let tho intelligent people explain to me why because if you can't see this then I will give you a hint. Recently Russia showed its true colours and took what country? That is the clue ?


Ok back to the original question.
Imo the reason nobody reacts is because in reality nothing changes from Turkey's actions.If something really changes e.g Turkey obstructing any of the operations for hydrocarbons there will be severe reaction be sure of that
There is a balance in every status quo. You said this balance is desirable because Turkey's presence here is to counterbalance whatever Russian presence the GCs would opt to.
However this "balance" creates another imbalance. Turkey gets extended control on areas that presumably are under British control via the British bases. It pushes the GCs to seek protection from Russia. And many other imbalances... The alternative to clear all those imbalances is simply to solve the Cyprus problem.

Now regarding the Crimea crisis. What has really changed? Nothing!! The Russians already had control of the Northern Caspian sea through their military presence in Crimea. Crimea was autonomous and had it's own parliament. Has anything of real essence changed? Isn't it obvious that what happened in Crimea was simply an effort to seal/protect Russians interests over the North of Caspian? Russians were simply afraid that given the unstable situation in Ukraine they would soon lose the control they ALREADY HAD of Northern Caspian sea.
The EU and their allies simply got pissed off because their plans did not go as smooth as they wanted to.
Other than that they just forgot everything within days.

NB. Obama said: Nobody doubts Russia's interests in Crimea (translation: Crimea means Northen Caspia sea)
Putin said:Of course! And that's what we did. We secured/sealed our interests in Crimea.((translation: Crimea means Northen Caspia sea)
Therefore "soru yok" :lol: :lol:


Fair and constructive comments. I agree with you
Mustiejodu
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 713
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2014 8:02 am

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby Get Real! » Sat Apr 05, 2014 2:36 pm

Mustiejodu wrote:Fair and constructive comments. I agree with you

Don't you worry about that wench... just get the Vaseline and come to daddy! :D
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby Mustiejodu » Sat Apr 05, 2014 2:44 pm

Get Real! wrote:
Mustiejodu wrote:Fair and constructive comments. I agree with you

Don't you worry about that wench... just get the Vaseline and come to daddy! :D




.
Mustiejodu
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 713
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2014 8:02 am

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby Pyrpolizer » Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:38 pm

Get Real! wrote:
Mustiejodu wrote:Fair and constructive comments. I agree with you

Don't you worry about that wench... just get the Vaseline and come to daddy! :D


Why reh? Just because a "Turk" happened to agree with a "Greek"? (albeit i hate these terms I prefer Kibrisli and Kypreos).
What if we always disagree with each other? How the hell are we going to solve the Cyprob?
You don't know what you are missing. Kibrisli hanimcik are the #1.And I bet kyprees yenekoues are the #1 for Mustiejodu
:wink: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12892
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby Mustiejodu » Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:47 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Mustiejodu wrote:Fair and constructive comments. I agree with you

Don't you worry about that wench... just get the Vaseline and come to daddy! :D


Why reh? Just because a "Turk" happened to agree with a "Greek"? (albeit i hate these terms I prefer Kibrisli and Kypreos).
What if we always disagree with each other? How the hell are we going to solve the Cyprob?
You don't know what you are missing. Kibrisli hanimcik are the #1.And I bet kyprees yenekoues are the #1 for Mustiejodu
:wink: :lol: :lol:



Perhaps my ancestors going back over 300 years may have been Turks and yours 2000 years ago but let's just stick to what we are now which I would be classed as british cypriot and no doubt your both cypriots from cyprus ? . There is nothing wrong with agreeing with each other. Don't disagree with people for the sake of it just because of their ethnic background. That's a bit racist is it not ?
Mustiejodu
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 713
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2014 8:02 am

Re: Why does no one directly object to turkey's invasive act

Postby Pyrpolizer » Sat Apr 05, 2014 4:02 pm

Mustiejodu wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Mustiejodu wrote:Fair and constructive comments. I agree with you

Don't you worry about that wench... just get the Vaseline and come to daddy! :D


Why reh? Just because a "Turk" happened to agree with a "Greek"? (albeit i hate these terms I prefer Kibrisli and Kypreos).
What if we always disagree with each other? How the hell are we going to solve the Cyprob?
You don't know what you are missing. Kibrisli hanimcik are the #1.And I bet kyprees yenekoues are the #1 for Mustiejodu
:wink: :lol: :lol:



Perhaps my ancestors going back over 300 years may have been Turks and yours 2000 years ago but let's just stick to what we are now which I would be classed as british cypriot and no doubt your both cypriots from cyprus ? . There is nothing wrong with agreeing with each other. Don't disagree with people for the sake of it just because of their ethnic background. That's a bit racist is it not ?


I am a Cypriot living in Cyprus. I consider all Cypriots to be brothers and sisters.
I consider all people to be children of God.
Unfortunately what you said above is what happens in this forum all the time....
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12892
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Previous

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests