GreekIslandGirl wrote:If your so called (non) 'evidence' came from something that was stated as not available, then you or they made it all up. Since even that source of yours said nothing about sanctions, then by logical deduction, YOU are the falsifier of information!
My evidence did not come from something I stated was not available. Your claim that it did is just classic GiG distortion of demonstrable evident actual fact to suit you needs. It came from the publicly available EU Commission Press release. In fact you are the one who claims to have not quoted from the publicly available EU commission press release, which previously you had dismissed, but claimed instead to have quote from the "the evaluation document" that is not publicly available, even though that is clearly not true and you did in fact quote verbatim from exactly that EU Commission press release. I did not make up the EU Commission press release, I quoted and linked from it from the primary source. Neither did the EU Commission itself 'make up' what was in that press release. That you can try to claim that something plainly and publicly stated in an EU Commission press release was made up by them (the EU Commission) just yet again shows the degree to which you will simply massacre truth to suit your needs.
The EU Commission's own press release was and is public. My evidence was and is from this public EU Commission press release. That is what I linked to from its primary source and that you have subsequently tried to dismissed (and then quote from yourself and then deny you quoted from even though you clearly did). In that EU Commission press release they publicly state what the conclusion of the draft Schengen Evaluation Report on Greece were, even though the full text of that draft report remain outside the public domain. They publicly state that the conclusion of that draft report were that "the draft report concludes that Greece is seriously neglecting its obligations and that there are serious deficiencies in the carrying out of external border controls that must be overcome and dealt with by the Greek authorities.". The press release does not report that there were 'discussion and debate' about what the conclusion of the draft report were , with some countries claiming it concluded one thing and others another. It just states, unequivocally, what the draft report conclusion were.
The public EU Commission's press released unequivocally stated that
the draft report concludes that Greece is seriously neglecting its obligations and that there are serious deficiencies in the carrying out of external border controls that must be overcome and dealt with by the Greek authorities.
Those are the exact words from the EU Commissions own public press release copied from the primary source of the EU Commissions own website. What is more they then go on in that same public press release to explicitly lay out what happens if a schengen member state is found in a Schengen evaluation report to have "seriously neglecting its obligations under the Schengen rules" and if there are "serious deficiencies in the carrying out of external border control" - that is exactly what they have previously said the draft Schengen Evaluation Report on Greece concluded. They then explicitly lay out in this same public EU Commission press release, that was and is 'my source', what sanctions can be imposed if the process to address "serious deficiencies" does not prove effective within three months.
It is this public EU Commission press release (my source) that then led to the avalanche of press reports from credible media outlets like the BBC, Guardian, Irish Times, Independent, Cyprus Mail reporting this EU Commission meeting and the press release following it under headlines like "EU threatens Greece over border controls" and "Greece given three months to avoid Schengen suspension" and "Greece hits back after EU's Schengen threat" and "Greece warned it faces expulsion from passport-free zone"
GreekIslandGirl wrote:You seem to have given up trying to find evidence for you statement .....
I can not provide evidence to someone who just denies and distorts factual truth and reality to suit their needs in the way that you systematically do and so clearly are doing yet again here. That is not what I am doing here. What I am doing here is just once more highlighting the lengths and degree to which you will do this because as I say I despise such utter contempt for truth that you display through such behaviour. As ever it amazes me that you can even imagine that anyone is actually fooled by such pathetic and weak attempts as those you make here in this thread, but evidently you do seem to think you are fooling someone, presumably other than just yourself.
