Cyprus-Forum.com

[Lordo]

If you want to prove a point you can twist statistics anyway you like and prove anything you wish.

Buuuuuuuuull shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit my friend.

12 months ago we were losing 1000 people a day.
Today's average is 200.

You don't need fuckin stinking stastics to see the picture. It is staring you in the face. There is an old saying, if it was a snake it would have bitten you gavole.

[Get Real!]

If you want to prove a point you can twist statistics anyway you like and prove anything you wish.

Buuuuuuuuull shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit my friend.

12 months ago we were losing 1000 people a day.
Today's average is 200.

You don't need fuckin stinking stastics to see the picture. It is staring you in the face. There is an old saying, if it was a snake it would have bitten you gavole.

In your simplistic mind you have selectively chosen 3 months from last year when the toll was very high and instantly given credit to jabs because this winter is different, but it’s not that simple.

I, on the other hand have proven using the stats that such an assumed pattern DID NOT continue so as to give credit to the jabs!

Had the jabs been useful then the number of dead MUST gradually approach ZERO but it's not happening... we're getting erratic fluctuations, and there’s no escape from that.

[Lordo]

If you want to prove a point you can twist statistics anyway you like and prove anything you wish.

Buuuuuuuuull shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit my friend.

12 months ago we were losing 1000 people a day.
Today's average is 200.

You don't need fuckin stinking stastics to see the picture. It is staring you in the face. There is an old saying, if it was a snake it would have bitten you gavole.

In your simplistic mind you have selectively chosen 3 months from last year when the toll was very high and instantly given credit to jabs because this winter is different, but it’s not that simple.

I, on the other hand have proven using the stats that such an assumed pattern DID NOT continue so as to give credit to the jabs!

Had the jabs been useful then the number of dead MUST gradually approach ZERO but it's not happening... we're getting erratic fluctuations, and there’s no escape from that.

You is mistaken. I did not take 3 months. Only took 1 month. This was a month where hardly anybody was vaccinated. If you look at every month since vaccination started you will see that the figures are the same order. There is no doubt what has caused the drop.

[Get Real!]

You is mistaken. I did not take 3 months. Only took 1 month. This was a month where hardly anybody was vaccinated. If you look at every month since vaccination started you will see that the figures are the same order. There is no doubt what has caused the drop.

Only in your simplistic mind Lordo because put simply…

1. Every single day there are thousands more getting jabbed worldwide!

2. Yet, we are not seeing a corresponding drop in the number of dead, as we should!

What more evidence do you want that the jabs are doing fuck-all to prevent death?

[Get Real!]

The mind of a programmer cannot be easily fooled, Lordo.

Here’s how a programmer’s mind works…

table4.PNG

See the difference? You only look for reasons to justify the jabs but I also look for signs of failure.

You've got to look at the stats and seek patterns that tell a story of either success or failure.

[Paphitis]

My definition of a true Darwinist…

Those that rushed to the queues to get jabbed; quite possibly punching and kicking those in front to get to the first spot (I also heard of some wealthier individuals paying those in front to take their spot), upon hearing that...

(1) The jabs can’t protect you from getting infected.

(2) There’s no guarantee that the jabs can prevent your death once infected.

(3) There’s no guarantee that the jab’s side-effects won’t kill you.

Lordo, does that remind you of anyone?

Its called risk management dear boy. You have so much more to learn yet but don't give up you hear.

If catch it I have at least done everything to stop it killing me. But I am very lucky with my genes. I have real thhousands of years old DNA in my veins well equiped to protect me with a bit of help from my jabs.

Lef left right. left left right. Now repeat after me.

So now you finally admit that there is no statistic at all or any evidence that the jab can help you!

Took a while to finally wake up.

Please quantify a little help please when there is no guarantee that the jab won't kill you.

From the beginning, no Covid vaccination producers ever claimed that it would protect anyone 100% from getting the Covid virus after receiving the jabs or not dying from it. It is no different than wearing a seatbelt in a car during a bad crash, which a person can still die and someone not wearing a seatbelt in the same vehicle might survive. One can take precautions in anything, but not given 100% guarantees to survive. You just increase your odds to survive, that’s all. Statistically, the number of deaths from Covid is lower now than last year before the vaccinations were introduced, despite daily new cases hitting new highs at present, therefore, something must be helping to keep the death rate low, no?

They are claiming 90% efficacy for Pfizer and 94% efficacy for Moderna.

Now show me the statistics that prove that Covid has reduced by 90%

There aren’t any. That’s because there is no efficacy anywhere near 90%

Highly debatable that there is any efficacy at all, especially now.

Covid cases are not lower. They are higher than ever before and they are increasing to a level now that we can all expect to get Covid in the next couple of years.

[Paphitis]

... the number of deaths from Covid is lower now than last year before the vaccinations were introduced, despite daily new cases hitting new highs at present, therefore, something must be helping to keep the death rate low, no?

Have a look at the column “change in daily %” of the table below taken from...

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavir ... de-graphs/

Such erratic fluctuations cannot possibly correspond to an ever-increasing number of jabbed worldwide!

table.PNG

Let's see it in another way...

table3.PNG

By observing the stats, identifying patterns and trying to make some sense out of such patterns, is where the answers to burning questions lay.

What I can easily rule out as not having any influence, is the number of people jabbed.

Btw, to answer the question as to why this time last year there were x2 deaths… what most likely happened during xmas 2020 was that the meek were taken out early by the virus.

Had the jabs been responsible then we should’ve been seeing a steady decline of dead gradually approaching ZERO but that’s clearly not happening.

Not just that but these are reported cases. How many are not reported from corrupt regimes worldwide. Not every country is truthful in its reporting.

And, in all countries there are many cases not even detected. Doesn’t matter what country we are talking about. The detected cases are only a fraction of what’s truly out there.

You can easily double all those statistics, maybe even triple them.

Reduction of death is because Omicron is less potent. And probably future mutations will be even less potent than Omicron but the bad thing is, they will be more transmissible and even airborne.

[Lordo]

You is mistaken. I did not take 3 months. Only took 1 month. This was a month where hardly anybody was vaccinated. If you look at every month since vaccination started you will see that the figures are the same order. There is no doubt what has caused the drop.

Only in your simplistic mind Lordo because put simply…

1. Every single day there are thousands more getting jabbed worldwide!

2. Yet, we are not seeing a corresponding drop in the number of dead, as we should!

What more evidence do you want that the jabs are doing fuck-all to prevent death?

That is because the vaccines have been taken by the rich nations, which means all around the world there is just not enough vaccines to make a difference. Add to that the non-existance of healthcare for those who are hispitalised and you will understand what is happening around the world.

Unless you compare like for like you get nonsense.

You cannot compare UK with India or any other poor country. What you can compare is UK with vaccination and UK without.

This is what they teach you at univerity. How to do experimentation where you get results that make sense.

[Get Real!]

You is mistaken. I did not take 3 months. Only took 1 month. This was a month where hardly anybody was vaccinated. If you look at every month since vaccination started you will see that the figures are the same order. There is no doubt what has caused the drop.

Only in your simplistic mind Lordo because put simply…

1. Every single day there are thousands more getting jabbed worldwide!

2. Yet, we are not seeing a corresponding drop in the number of dead, as we should!

What more evidence do you want that the jabs are doing fuck-all to prevent death?

That is because the vaccines have been taken by the rich nations, which means all around the world there is just not enough vaccines to make a difference. Add to that the non-existance of healthcare for those who are hispitalised and you will understand what is happening around the world.

Unless you compare like for like you get nonsense.

You cannot compare UK with India or any other poor country. What you can compare is UK with vaccination and UK without.

This is what they teach you at univerity. How to do experimentation where you get results that make sense.

So what about Paphitis assertion that the same 3rd world nations are under-reporting their dead?

[Get Real!]

In my attempt to make Lordo understand and accept his severe Darwinism; since he rushed no less than 3 times to the queues to get jabbed while beating up little old ladies who were in front of him, I will play along with his request by sticking to UK-only statistics so here goes...

UK.PNG

So do you now understand your Darwinism Lordo?

You can’t just give credit to jabs whenever it suits you!