Cyprus-Forum.com

[Get Real!]

Which wars has NATO fought and won?

We’re actually seeing NATO right now involved in the conflict in the Ukraine where 40+ countries have sent and some are still sending military hardware, the US is also offering intel support, there were around 7,000 foreign troops helping the Ukraine, and countless official NATO support personnel.

So how is NATO going so far in the Ukraine?

[Get Real!]

Here you go…

European Commandos & CIA Operating on the Ground in Ukraine
https://geopolitics.co/2022/06/29/europ ... n-ukraine/

And they’re still getting beaten to a pulp!

[Kikapu]

You guys cant be serious, Russia couldn't take on NATO and expect to win.

Putin recognizes this and that is why he reminds them of the nuclear option.

NATO is like a rudderless dysfunctional family.

With the recent blackmailing by Turkey for NATO to suppress Human Rights in order to give its blessings to add two more members, the organization is also without true values and principles, but only functions in expediency. To put it in another way, NATO is corrupt to it’s core and does not live by the values it proclaims when it does not uphold democracy and Human Rights, which is why Erdogan was able to fuck it in the ass the other day and NATO was all smiles afterwards.

So, NATO now stands for “Need Another Turkish Orgasm”.

I know some are avoiding my question so let me ask one more time, which is, why is NATO sitting out of the fight in Ukraine with boots on the ground when it had no problem invading weaker opponents in the past as “Coalition of the Coerced”?

The west all but believe that Russia is no match for it and that it’s military power is crap. Really, then where is the action by NATO to prove itself right along with some on here who believe the same!

They have already said why. They do not want to fight Russian Army. But they don't mind supplying weapons to the Ukrainians so they can get slaughtered instead.

When they couls have sat around a table resolve their differences and the killing would stop or even it could have never started. We now know that mainobjection of Russia was Ukrainian Nato membership. If they stopped firing in the east on the Russian Ukranians and stopped their Nato membership talks this war would never have started. They did not even need to meet in person, they could do it over zoom ffs.

It is not rocket science is it?

Even a comedian should be able to work that one out.

Well, the comedian clown in Kyiv did not get it.

He was most probably promised “Churchillhood” by the West if he stayed and fought the Russians.

[Maximus]

You guys cant be serious, Russia couldn't take on NATO and expect to win.

Putin recognizes this and that is why he reminds them of the nuclear option.

NATO is like a rudderless dysfunctional family.

With the recent blackmailing by Turkey for NATO to suppress Human Rights in order to give its blessings to add two more members, the organization is also without true values and principles, but only functions in expediency. To put it in another way, NATO is corrupt to it’s core and does not live by the values it proclaims when it does not uphold democracy and Human Rights, which is why Erdogan was able to fuck it in the ass the other day and NATO was all smiles afterwards.

So, NATO now stands for “Need Another Turkish Orgasm”.

I know some are avoiding my question so let me ask one more time, which is, why is NATO sitting out of the fight in Ukraine with boots on the ground when it had no problem invading weaker opponents in the past as “Coalition of the Coerced”?

The west all but believe that Russia is no match for it and that it’s military power is crap. Really, then where is the action by NATO to prove itself right along with some on here who believe the same!

Simply because they dont need to put boots on the ground when the Ukrainians are more motivated and willing to fight Russia. From a strategic perspective, its better to use Ukraine to fight Russia by proxy first to weaken and wear Russia down.

The reason why they had no problem invading weaker opponents is because they are weaker opponents. if or when Russia is weak enough, then maybe they will get involved directly. but the bigger problem is the WMDs Russia possesses. So if they get directly involved, it can become very chaotic, opening up many fronts instead of the battlefield being contained to Ukraine.

[Kikapu]

You guys cant be serious, Russia couldn't take on NATO and expect to win.

Putin recognizes this and that is why he reminds them of the nuclear option.

NATO is like a rudderless dysfunctional family.

With the recent blackmailing by Turkey for NATO to suppress Human Rights in order to give its blessings to add two more members, the organization is also without true values and principles, but only functions in expediency. To put it in another way, NATO is corrupt to it’s core and does not live by the values it proclaims when it does not uphold democracy and Human Rights, which is why Erdogan was able to fuck it in the ass the other day and NATO was all smiles afterwards.

So, NATO now stands for “Need Another Turkish Orgasm”.

I know some are avoiding my question so let me ask one more time, which is, why is NATO sitting out of the fight in Ukraine with boots on the ground when it had no problem invading weaker opponents in the past as “Coalition of the Coerced”?

The west all but believe that Russia is no match for it and that it’s military power is crap. Really, then where is the action by NATO to prove itself right along with some on here who believe the same!

Simply because they dont need to put boots on the ground when the Ukrainians are more motivated and willing to fight Russia. From a strategic perspective, its better to use Ukraine to fight Russia by proxy first to weaken and wear Russia down.

The reason why they had no problem invading weaker opponents is because they are weaker opponents. if or when Russia is weak enough, then maybe they will get involved directly. but the bigger problem is the WMDs Russia possesses. So if they get directly involved, it can become very chaotic, opening up many fronts instead of the battlefield being contained to Ukraine.

So basically what you are saying is, NATO is not good for anything other than picking on little weak countries.

Great!

[Maximus]

What I am saying is different opponents require different strategies and tactics.

And, there are some opponents where its best not to engage.

Not that I agree with NATO countries invading weaker countries.

[Get Real!]

What I am saying is different opponents require different strategies and tactics.

And, there are some opponents where its best not to engage.

Not that I agree with NATO countries invading weaker countries.

Well so far the only “opponents” we’ve seen NATO tackle, are ones that can’t defend themselves!

[Get Real!]

I think the stupid Ukrainians should stand aside and let the Anglo-Americans come in to take their place in the Ukraine.

[Paphitis]

Well what a great day for NATO.

NATO has added 2 great nations into the fold and have expanded their north eastern flank.

Thank you Pootin. NATO's employee of the month!

Putin welcomed them too.

He must not be concerned regarding NATO’s enlargement!

He is more concerned with his own “enlargement”!

Putin just wants all of Ukraine that touches the Black Sea and NATO is allowing him to do just that, even if it takes years.

So, can someone tell me what NATO is good for, and please don’t give me the old BS that NATO is a Defensive Organisation, because when it comes to countries it can attack and destroy just like former Yugoslavia and Iraq invading Kuwait (desert storm) to name a couple, but when it comes to Russia, no action, just give weapons to Ukraine to commit suicide as it is left alone against Russia. All the bravado NATO is doing is like a chihuahua being a pest with his little barks against a powerful Pitbull that is on a strong leash.

Gee I don't know if you have figured it out yet, but it's seriously doubtful anyone in NATO takes Pootin seriously at this point in time.

His military has become a literal laughing stock. The reality is, NATO is far too strong and superior. It is doubtful Pootin is able to take on Turkey let alone the other 30 members at the same time.

It would be the end of Pootin, and quite possibly the end of Russia.

Pootin is now a desperate man.

[Get Real!]

Well what a great day for NATO.

NATO has added 2 great nations into the fold and have expanded their north eastern flank.

Thank you Pootin. NATO's employee of the month!

Putin welcomed them too.

He must not be concerned regarding NATO’s enlargement!

He is more concerned with his own “enlargement”!

Putin just wants all of Ukraine that touches the Black Sea and NATO is allowing him to do just that, even if it takes years.

So, can someone tell me what NATO is good for, and please don’t give me the old BS that NATO is a Defensive Organisation, because when it comes to countries it can attack and destroy just like former Yugoslavia and Iraq invading Kuwait (desert storm) to name a couple, but when it comes to Russia, no action, just give weapons to Ukraine to commit suicide as it is left alone against Russia. All the bravado NATO is doing is like a chihuahua being a pest with his little barks against a powerful Pitbull that is on a strong leash.

Gee I don't know if you have figured it out yet, but it's seriously doubtful anyone in NATO takes Pootin seriously at this point in time.

His military has become a literal laughing stock. The reality is, NATO is far too strong and superior. It is doubtful Pootin is able to take on Turkey let alone the other 30 members at the same time.

It would be the end of Pootin, and quite possibly the end of Russia.

Pootin is now a desperate man.

NATO are making fools of themselves in the Ukraine right now, while you live in a parallel universe with a premature ejaculation running down your pants at the slightest mention of Trump!