The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


US BRITS..

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

US BRITS..

Postby bigfatlondonboy » Mon Mar 20, 2006 8:52 pm

OK PEOPLE HERE WE GO .SOME OF YOU ON HERE ARE DEAD AGAINST THE BASES.BUT WHAT ARE YOUR FEELING TOWARDS THE BRITS THAT MOVE TO SOUTHERN CYPRUS.TO LIVE.JUST ASKIN AND PLEASE DONT GET TO SHITTY WITH EACH OTHER NOW...
bigfatlondonboy
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 252
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:46 pm
Location: drosia

Postby andri_cy » Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:06 pm

I dont have one problem with you's :)
My sister in law is british she a nice girlie
User avatar
andri_cy
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2491
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:35 am
Location: IN, USA

Postby Piratis » Mon Mar 20, 2006 9:34 pm

We have no problem with the British people. We have no problem with any kind of people.

Our problem is with the policies of some governments and with the illegal actions of some individuals (no matter were those individuals come from).

The bases were given to the UK as part of the treaty of guarantee were the UK along with Greece and Turkey were supposed to "guarantee the independence, territorial integrity and security of the Republic of Cyprus".

Now when the UK (government) not only didn't act according to the treaty but they also seem to favor the Turks and the occupation, you can understand why Greek Cypriots are so against the bases. We feel cheated by the UK (to say the least). If they don't want to act in accordance to that treaty then they should decline their guarantor position and return the bases to Republic of Cyprus.

But I repeat: This has nothing to do with the British people. I just hope that the British people will understand that the policies of UK/US governments around the world are often not fair ones and they should demand from their governments a fair foreign policy.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby rawk » Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:44 am

British Sovereign Bases up for sale, Turkey highest bidder to date! Headlnes in Cyprus Mail 2007! Ooops!
No.... maybe they can stay for a bit....

rawk
User avatar
rawk
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 648
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:03 pm
Location: Larnaca on Sea, Cyprus

Re: US BRITS..

Postby cypezokyli » Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:57 am

bigfatlondonboy wrote:OK PEOPLE HERE WE GO .SOME OF YOU ON HERE ARE DEAD AGAINST THE BASES.BUT WHAT ARE YOUR FEELING TOWARDS THE BRITS THAT MOVE TO SOUTHERN CYPRUS.TO LIVE.JUST ASKIN AND PLEASE DONT GET TO SHITTY WITH EACH OTHER NOW...


why dont you ask the brits living here how they feel ? :wink:
or how they are treated ?
cypezokyli
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: deutschland

Postby Agios Amvrosios » Tue Mar 21, 2006 1:08 am

I reckon that british people are tip top fantastic people but that their government is a bit of a colonialist bully.

I think the way to think of it is that you can't blame them because their governed by bLIAR
Agios Amvrosios
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 857
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:18 am

Postby rawk » Tue Mar 21, 2006 1:35 am

Every successful politician always picks or welcomes a fight to prove their integrity and strength, sometimes it works , sometimes it doesn't. I'll start in 1939,
Winston Churchill Germany
Anthony Eden Suez/Korea
Margaret Thatcher Falklands
Tony Blair Iraq 2003

Unfortunately, Britain can punch above its weight, its armed forces are small but highly effective, mostly due to its unconscripted recruits citing their more favourite pastime as getting into a well organised punch up as part of their recreational weekend entertainment. As the Duke of Wellington remarked as he looked at the motley British regiments strung across the hillside at Waterloo, " They may not scare the French, but by God, they scare me!"

Blair is here today, gone tomorrow. The next PM will pick a fight somewhere to keep our forces up to speed, its a Brit thing, soldiers kept locked up in barracks are crap at fighting, thats the secret. Always keep a fight going somewhere, best training ever!

rawk
User avatar
rawk
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 648
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:03 pm
Location: Larnaca on Sea, Cyprus

Postby andri_cy » Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:13 am

rawk wrote:Every successful politician always picks or welcomes a fight to prove their integrity and strength, sometimes it works , sometimes it doesn't. I'll start in 1939,
Winston Churchill Germany
Anthony Eden Suez/Korea
Margaret Thatcher Falklands
Tony Blair Iraq 2003

Unfortunately, Britain can punch above its weight, its armed forces are small but highly effective, mostly due to its unconscripted recruits citing their more favourite pastime as getting into a well organised punch up as part of their recreational weekend entertainment. As the Duke of Wellington remarked as he looked at the motley British regiments strung across the hillside at Waterloo, " They may not scare the French, but by God, they scare me!"

Blair is here today, gone tomorrow. The next PM will pick a fight somewhere to keep our forces up to speed, its a Brit thing, soldiers kept locked up in barracks are crap at fighting, thats the secret. Always keep a fight going somewhere, best training ever!

rawk


your point?
User avatar
andri_cy
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2491
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:35 am
Location: IN, USA

Postby Sotos » Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:14 am

Always keep a fight going somewhere, best training ever!

You think this is right? As others said it is the governments we don't like. In UK their democracy probably didn't give them much options anyways. But in USA I just can't understand how American people voted for Bush ... twice! Doesn't this mean that those that voted for him also have a share of responsibility for their government's actions?
User avatar
Sotos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11357
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 2:50 am

Postby andri_cy » Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:16 am

Sotos wrote:
Always keep a fight going somewhere, best training ever!

You think this is right? As others said it is the governments we don't like. In UK their democracy probably didn't give them much options anyways. But in USA I just can't understand how American people voted for Bush ... twice! Doesn't this mean that those that voted for him also have a share of responsibility for their government's actions?



I dont like bush but I will say one thing. I dont know about the previous election, but at the last one he was the best of 2 evils. John Kerry was for the war in Iraq one minute against the other, didnt know what the hell was going on, was a coward marionette of the wrost kind. and no I didnt vote because I am not changing my citizenship.
User avatar
andri_cy
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2491
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:35 am
Location: IN, USA

Next

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests