Cyprus-Forum.com

[miltiades]

Viewpoint , would you think it would be proper for the Prime ministers' wife to defend Osama ? Of courser not , not for any money. The same applies to the orams case since it is a political hot potato that could have wider implications than an ordinary civil case, she obviously has an ulterior motive.

[Pyrpolizer]

Cypezokyli,

Since you like asking personal questions, first ask yourself whether Viewpoint represents the average TC.

[Viewpoint]

pyrpolizer, may i ask you how many tcs have you met up to now in your life ?

from his answers I would guess a big fat zero.

miltiades

Viewpoint , would you think it would be proper for the Prime ministers' wife to defend Osama ? Of courser not , not for any money. The same applies to the orams case since it is a political hot potato that could have wider implications than an ordinary civil case, she obviously has an ulterior motive.

So you dont think she has the freedom or the right to represent who she wishes? isnt that discriminating based on who she married to?

[Realist]

I wonder if Viewpoint would have so much 'Cherie Luv' if she was supporting the GC?

I guess that the date for the court case was also a coincidence (sceduled on the 27th of July; invasion partII).

Who are we kidding, the High court will give the a win so all those Brits who are still sore from being kicked off the island in the first place can smirk at the GC expense.

[Viewpoint]

I would still say she has the right to take on which ever case she wishes...

[cypezokyli]

Cypezokyli,

Since you like asking personal questions, first ask yourself whether Viewpoint represents the average TC.

if you are interested at the views of the average tcs....this is the closest i can give you :
http://www.CyprusPolls.org/BuildingTrust.pdf

my question , to you had to do with a research contacted by the University of cyprus, concerning gc and tc fears and attitudes. the prof , suggested , raprochement as the "treatment".

if you feel that the the above question disturbs your private personal rights , you have every right , not to answer it. you just seem , to present very "sure" opinions about what tcs are /think - and i was wondering which are your sources.

i mean ( and i hope you agree with me) it makes a whole big difference if you reached such conclusions from an often interaction with tcs , or from listening to lazaros mavros morning show



...........
@ realist : for which exactly invasion are you refferring at ? !!!!

[Realist]

But you wouldn't be happy about it would you?

[andri_cy]

I would still say she has the right to take on which ever case she wishes...

Thats what I said, but because I also said that maybe it is not a good idea you said I am discriminating against her. You read what I write and you only digest the part that suits you.
I never said she doesnt have the right to take up any case she wants. Actually, I believe I did say the opposite. But she and every one of us have to realize and admit that since her husband is the leader of the country she practices in, she cant fancy herself as just another lawyer, because she is not. Once she takes up political cases, that action carries a little bit of political weight just BECAUSE she is the PM's wife. So, what I was saying, in the posting that you ended up calling me basically a discriminator for, is that she does have the right to take any case she wants; maybe she should just use a bit more common sense when those case are political given who her husband is-no matter who's side she is taking.

If Laura Bush was a lawyer and she represented any one of the soldiers that were accused of rape in Iraq that would have been inapropriate.
If Laura Bush was a Laywer and she were hired to represent Osama Bin Laden, it would have been inappropriate. That's just how it is.

[Pyrpolizer]

from his answers I would guess a big fat zero.

i mean ( and i hope you agree with me) it makes a whole big difference if you reached such conclusions from an often interaction with tcs , or from listening to lazaros mavros morning show

Lazaros Mavros??? You must be joking really. I listened him once and he gave me on the nerves.
Look I am not going to satisfy your curiosity , so you may hire Viewpoint to answer your questions for me.

[theresa]

This case is only to decide whether the Orams UK assetts can be seized, I dont think that they (the GC's) will win this case (rightly or wrongly). However - that does not mean that they cant (the GC that is) apply to European courts of Human rights, where it is likely they WILL win (others have). In a way I feel that the GC's involved have wasted time with this, it will be a blow for GC's who want their land back but the final outcome will be decided in their favour elsewhere I am sure. With regards the rights or wrongs of Cheri taking the case on, I beleive she is free to take on whatever case she wants, BUT like Andri-ci I dont think that it was an apppropriate case.
Tess