The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Looking for friends? For a boyfriend/girlfriend? Lover? Pen-pal?


Postby _urun » Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:19 pm

dear friends...

we, progressive young people, should take care and increase of bicommunal relations to make our communities ready for the peace in cyprus.

so; go ahead...

New Member
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:31 pm
Location: famagusta

Postby brother » Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:39 pm

So what do you suggest to kick it off.
User avatar
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby _urun » Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:44 pm


we have many many bicommunal NGO'S and we can form some more...
which they are doing these kind of things, try to solve common problems -drugs, traffic, history.... etc.

taking actions in political parties which are struggling 4 these all..

here is some of them


New Member
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:31 pm
Location: famagusta

Postby brother » Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:23 pm is some of them you said, where urun.
User avatar
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby erolz » Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:52 pm

or you are all welcome to come over to my house and we can eat, drink, dance and party if you like :)
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
Posts: 2414
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: Girne / Kyrenia

Postby brother » Thu Dec 23, 2004 12:17 pm

:D party time :D
User avatar
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby city » Thu Dec 23, 2004 5:20 pm

Hi erolz, sounds good! ;o)
User avatar
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: Germany

Postby Piratis » Fri Dec 24, 2004 7:01 pm

bicommunal NGO'S and we can form some more

Would anybody be interested to join a reaprachment NGO were the aim would be the unity of Cyprus and the equality among all Cypriots?

Unfortunately it seems to me that most of these NGOs are US sponsored and they are promoting things like separation of Cypriots based on religion and language. (= serving the interests of the sponsors that expect their return on investment, and not the interests of Cypriots as a whole)
User avatar
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

conflict reasolutions...

Postby _urun » Sun Jan 23, 2005 4:33 pm

Basic principle of the method is that social partners and the government have to work together when
- analysing today’s situation,
- making a vision on future development and challenges and
- drafting a development project

To develop positive relationships between members of the Turkish and Greek Cypriot communities by:
a. breaking down stereotypes and misconceptions of the other community,
b. increasing understanding of the perspectives of others, and
c. building trust between members of the two communities.
2. To offer opportunities to develop communication and conflict resolution skills that participants would use in their work, community and personal lives.
Indirect Goals
1. To build support for community reconciliation in conjunction with a political solution to the Cyprus Problem by:
a. enabling the development of friendships and professional relationships between members of the two communities,
b. encouraging a focus on the future,
c. developing joint projects to address shared social, environmental and economic concerns on the island.
2. To have participants understand the Cyprus Problem in new ways and generate creative ideas for a resolution to be used by policy makers or third parties to inform a settlement.
In short, as one person interviewed summarized it,
AMaybe Greek and Turkish Cypriots can make sincere friendships.
Then--maybe they will begin to trust one another.
Then--maybe they will have a willingness to cooperate.
Then--maybe they will do something.
Another said,
AIf Turkish and Greek Cypriots can meet and become friends,
Then maybe they won=t be so ready to kill one [email protected]
This focus of having individuals from the two communities meet to listen to one another=s perspectives and develop warm human relationships remains the goal of the Fulbright Commission in its support of both conflict resolution trainings and other bicommunal activities.
Expanded Goal
Just as the meaning of conflict resolution trainings and the definition of the term trainer expanded and changed over the course of the years, interviews with the Cypriot trainers indicated that the goals for the training also expanded. It seems that this development occurred in conjunction with the initiation of the bicommunal dialogue groups and the increased involvement of Cypriot trainers in directing bicommunal activities. While never seeking to replace the role of policy makers in negotiating a settlement to the Cyprus Problem, trainers= expected this more far reaching outcome:
To mobilize additional people in both communities to actively work toward reconciliation and peace.
In order to consider the effects and effectiveness of the conflict resolution training, it will be important to think about how well both the original goals and the expanded one have been addressed, and what might be done to move further toward these goals.
1. Win Win Approach
Opponents or Partners
The Win/Win Approach is about changing the conflict from adversarial attack and defence, to co-operation. It is a powerful shift of attitude that alters the whole course of communication.
One person consistently applying a joint problem-solving approach can make the difference. You, the reader, will probably be that person - redirecting the course of the conflict. Therefore, the first person you have to convince is yourself.
Until we give it attention, we are usually unaware of the way we argue. We often find ourselves with a knee-jerk reaction in difficult situations - based on long established habits combined with the passing mood of the moment. When challenged, we experience separateness, disconnectedness from those around us - a feeling of "you or me" - a sense that there isn't enough for both of us and if one person is right, then the other person must be wrong. Often we haven't taken even a moment to consider what is the best approach in the circumstances.
While people battle over opposing solutions "Do it my way!", "No, that's no good! Do it my way!", the conflict is a power struggle. What is needed is to change the agenda in the conversation. The win/win approach says:
I want to win
I want you to win too.
The challenge now is how to have this happen.
Go Back to Needs
The most important win/win manoeuvre you can make is to change course by beginning to discuss underlying needs, rather than only looking at solutions. The following story makes the point quite well:
There are two people in a kitchen. There is only one orange left and both of them want it. What would you expect as the solution? Compromise is one option. They might cut it in half and each gets half.
Let's assume that's what they do. One person now goes to the juicer and starts squeezing herself a rather too small orange juice. The other, with some difficulty, begins to grate the rind of the orange to flavour a cake.
Had they discussed needs rather than heading straight to solutions, they could have both had the equivalent of a whole orange. Their needs were complementary, in fact, not conflicting. With the determination to use a win/win approach, two sets of needs can frequently dovetail together.
Addressing each person s underlying needs means you build solutions that acknowledge and value those needs, rather than denying them. Even where solutions cannot be as perfect as in the orange story, the person feels quite differently about the outcome.
To probe below the surface requires redirecting the energy. Ask questions like "Why does that seeem to be the best solution to you?", "What's your real need here?", "What interests need to be served in this situation?", "What values are important to you here?", "What's the outcome or result you want?"
The answers to these questions significantly alters the agenda on the discussion table. It places there the right materials for co-operative problem- solving. It leads to opportunities for you to say what you need and for other people to say what they need too.
I want what's fair for all of us.
A win/win approach rests on strategies involving:
• going back to underlying needs
• recognition of individual differences
• openness to adapting one s position in the light of shared information and attitudes
• attacking the problem, not the people.
The Win/Win Approach is certainly ethical, but the reason for its great success is that IT WORKS. Where both people win, both are tied to the solution. They feel committed to the plan because it actually suits them.
Even when trust between the parties is very limited, the Win/Win Approach can be effective. If there's some doubt about the other person keeping their end of the bargain you can make the agreement reciprocal. "I'll do X for you, if you do Y for me." X supports their needs, Y supports yours. "I'll drive you to the party, if you clean the car." "I'll help you draw up those figures for your reports, if you sort out these invoice queries."
It's a successful strategy. Usually, co-operation can result in both people getting more of what they want. The Win/Win Approach is Conflict Resolution for mutual gain.

2. Creative Response
Problems or Challenges
The Creative response to conflict is about turning problems into possibilities. It is about consciously choosing to see what can be done, rather than staying with how terrible it all is. It is affirming that you will choose to extract the best form the situation.
Our attitudes colour our thoughts. Usually we are quite unaware of how they shape the way we see the world. Two dramatically contrasting attitudes in life are "Perfection" versus "Discovery". Let's call them attitude "hats". What "hat" do you get dressed in each day? Do you see difficulties as problems or as challenges?
The Perfection hat says: "Is this good enough or not?" (Usually not!) "Does this meet my impeccably high standards?"
The Discovery hat says: "How fascinating! What are the possibilities here?"
What is our mind chattering about under our Perfection hat?
Right or wrong?
Do I measure up?
Life is struggle.
Mistakes are unaccepTable.
Unbendable beliefs about what's proper.

Do you measure up?
Life is hard work.
I have to be right.
Don't take any chances!

Low self-esteem!
The search for Perfection sets up:
"Winners - & - Losers".
Such yardsticks can be used to make decisions about traffic jams, your partner, the kids, the photostat machine, the boss and - above all - you.
Is there a Discovery hat still sitting on the shelf in your wardrobe of possibilities? You may hardly have worn it since you were a young child. When you learnt to walk you didn't go "right foot", "wrong foot". It was just right foot, left foot, and each fall was as interesting as the next step. To the young child, everything is part of the great experiment.
You can get out that hat again and dust it off. What's tucked away underneath your Discovery hat?
Let's take a risk
What are the possibilities?
Everything's a success

How else can we look at this?

High self-esteem!
The process of Discovery invites:
"Winners - & - Learners".
If there are no failures, only learning, self-esteem gets a big boost upwards. You can put on your Discovery hat and problems look like intriguing crossword puzzles. "What will make the difference so he stops complaining to me all the time?", "What else can I try to get the kids to help with washing up?", "What are we freed up to do now that $7 million order has just been cancelled?", "How fascinating, the photostat machine has broken down again!"
Another Challenge? How Fascinating!
Are you judgemental and critical of your mistakes? Children who are continually protected from making mistakes can grow up dependent and overly cautious. Bosses who are overly critical of errors often get "yes" people to serve in their organisations. This doesn't mean you don't point out errors, or go through a correcting process. It means the error is regarded as a splendid opportunity for learning.
When an organisation encourages the willingness to risk in its employees, it gets an alive and motivated staff. We are at our most energised as we stand ready to act on the edge of our personal unknowns.
A not-so-famous but should be maxim: "If a thing's worth doing, it's worth doing badly!" is an invitation to experiment and risk.
Robert Kyosaki in his "Money and You" workshops often relates the very telling story of the IBM company in the States. One middle executive there made a tactical error that cost the company $9 million. The following week the executive, sure he was about to be fired, was called into the office of the Chairman. The Chairman started discussing plans for a huge new projet that he wanted the executive to direct. After a certain point, the executive was feeling so uncomfortable he had to stop the Chairman: "Excuse me, sir, you know I'm amazed. Last week I cost us $9 million. Why are you putting me in charge of this new project? I thought you were going to fire me." The Chairman smiled. "Fire you? Young man, I've just invested $9 million educating you. You're now one of my most valuable assets." Here was a chairman who valued the willingness to risk and learn. He knew it was an essential ingredient in the successful executive.
Life is not about winning and losing - it's about learning. When you fall down, you pick yourself up and note where the pot-hole was so you can walk around it the next time. A person who has gone "too far" knows just how far they can go. No "winners - and - losers", just "winners - and - learners".
That's the essence of

3. Empathy
The Tasks of Active Listening
Empathy is about rapport and openness between people. When it is absent, people are less likely to consider your needs and feelings. The best way to build empathy is to help the other person feel that they are understood. That means being an active listener. There are specific listening activities relevant to different situations - information, affirmation or inflammation.
1. INFORMATION - getting a clear picture
AIM OF SPEAKER: to get across what is wanted so there is no confusion.
TASK OF LISTENER: to get the details, to check out and confirm what they are saying and what they are forgetting to say.
Here you are trying to find out about needs, instructions, background information.
ASK QUESTIONS - Find out about needs, instructions, context, timing, costs etc.
CHECK BACK - to be sure you have heard and understood the relevant details.
SUMMARISE - to make sure you both agree on the facts.
To get a "Yes, that's what I want" so you are both clear.
Don't jump straight into solutions.
Collect information.
Find out how it is on the other side first.

• Enquire about their needs in the situation.
• Enquire about their concerns, anxieties or difficulties.
• Find out their view of the needs and concerns of other relevant people affecting the situation.
• Ask general questions that encourage them to open up e.g. How do you see it all?
• Ask specific questions that will give you significant pieces of information e.g. How much does it cost?
• Explore hidden premises on which they build their thinking.
If they say "I can't" you might ask "What happens if you do?"
If they say "They always..." you might ask "Are there any circumstances in which they don't?"
If they say "It's too many, or too much" or "It's too little or too few" you might ask "compared with what?"
2. AFFIRMATION - affirming, acknowledging, exploring the problem.
AIM OF SPEAKER: to talk about the problem.
TASK OF LISTENER: to acknowledge their feelings, to help them hear what they are saying.
Here you are recognising that the other person would be helped by you taking time to hear their problem.
LISTEN - attentively to the other person who will benefit from having their problem acknowledged by you.
REFLECT BACK - to the other person their feelings, and perhaps the content of the problem with a single statement of acknowledgement periodically.
EXPLORE - to unfold the difficulty in more depth. If time permits, assist the speaker in finding greater clarity and understanding for themselves.
To get a "Yes, that's what I feel" so they explore what they are saying and they know they've been understood.
Use Active Listening when
offering advice won't help.
Active Listening builds relationship.

• Don't ignore or deny their feelings.
• Read the non-verbal as well as the verbal communication to assess feelings.
• Check back with them about their feelings as well as the content even though they may only be telling you about the content.
• If you're not sure how they feel, ask them e.g. "How do you feel about that?", "How did that affect you?"
• Reflect back to them what you hear them to be saying so they can hear themselves.
• Reflect back to them what you hear them to be saying so they know you understand.
• If you get it wrong, ask an open question and try again e.g. "How do you see the situation?"
• When time permits: direct the conversation back to the point if the person drifts to a less significant topic because they feel you don't understand.
• Allow silences in the conversation.
• Remember that your active listening is a method of helping the other person focus below the words to the unresolved issues.
• Notice sighs and body shifts. They usually indicate insight or acceptance. Pause before asking something like "How does it all seem to you now?"
3. INFLAMMATION - responding to a complaint or attack on you
AIM OF SPEAKER: to tell you that you are the problem.
TASK OF LISTENER: to let them know you've taken in what they are saying and to defuse the strong emotion.
Here you are choosing the most useful response when someone is telling you they are unhappy with you, criticising you, complaining about you, or just simply yelling.
DON'T DEFEND yourself at this point. It will inflame them further.
DEAL FIRST WITH THEIR EMOTIONS - People shout because they don't think they are being heard. Make sure they know they are - that you are hearing how angry or upset they are. Label accurately the emotions/feelings as you perceive them.
ACKNOWLEDGE THEIR SIDE - This does not mean you agree with them, only that you are registering their viewpoint e.g. "I can see, if you think that was my attitude, why you are so angry", "I can see why the problem makes you so upset".
Draw them out further. Explore gently with them if there is more behind the emotion.
Once the heat is out of the conversation, you might say how it is for you without denying how it is for them.
Ask what could be done now to make it OK again. If they heat up again, go back to Active Listening.
Move towards options for change or solution. Ask what they really want, or what they want now.
To get a "Yes, that's what I said" so that they know you have taken in what they said.
For them to change
first I must change.

• One of the first things I might need to change is my approach.
• Don't rise to the bait, and retaliate.
• Don't start justifying.
• Don't act defensive.
• Go into Active Listening mode and stay there till they've calmed down.
• Use phrases like "It's making you really mad", "I can see how upset you are", "You feel like you've reached your limit", "Have I got it right?", "So when I do... you get really frustrated with me."
Keep on reflecting back as accurately as you can until they come down from the high emotion. If you are doing it right, they will explain everything in some detail, but as the interchange continues the heat should be going out of the conversation.

. Appropriate Assertiveness
When to use "I" Statements
The essence of Appropriate Assertiveness is being able to state your case without arousing the defences of the other person. The secret of sucess lies in saying how it is for you rather than what they should or shouldn't do. "the way I see it...", attached to your assertive statement, helps. A skilled "I" statement goes even further.
When you want to state your point of view helpfully, the "I" statement formula can be useful. An "I" statement says how it is on my side, how I see it.
You could waste inordinate quantitites of brain power debating how the other person will or won't respond. Don't! You do need to be sure that you haven't used inflaming language, which would be highly likely to cause a negative response i.e. it should be "clean". Because you don't know beforehand whether the other person will do what you want or not, the cleanest "I" statements are delivered not to force them to fix things, but to state what you need.
Use an "I" statement when you need to let the other person know you are feeling strongly about the issue. Others often underestimate how hurt or angry or put out you are, so it's useful to say exactly what's going on for you - making the situation appear neither better nor worse i.e. your "I" statement should be "clear".
What Your "I" Statement Isn't
Your "I" statement is not about being polite. It's not to do with "soft" or "nice", nor should it be rude. It's about being clear.
It's a conversation opener, not the resolution. It's the opener to improving rather than deteriorating relationships.
If you expect it to be the answer and to fix what's not working straight away - you may have an unrealistic expectation.
If you expect the other person to respond as you want them to immediately, you may have an unrealistic expectation.
What you can realistically expect is that an appropriate "I" statement made with good intent
• is highly unlikely to do any harm
• is a step in the right direction
• is sure to change the current situation in some way
• can/will open up to possibilities you may not yet see.
Sometimes the situation may not look any different yet after a clean, clear "I" statement it often feels different, and that on its own can change things. Here's an example:
Nan was upset when she heard her adult son, Tommy, had visited town and not bothered to call or see her. They seemed to be growing further apart, and she had been brooding over this. She did not want to appear to nag him, or say anything to make things worse. She did want to see him when he came to town.
When next they spoke, instead of putting on her "pretending not to be hurt" voice, she prepared herself for the conversatin with a well rehearsed "I" statement. She got it "clear" and "clean". She was very sure she wanted a conversation that would be different from all those times she hinted at the problem without really saying it.
"When I miss out on seeing you I feel hurt and what I'd like is to have contact with you when you are in town."
She said it. Tommy immediately reacted with "You're always going at me with the same old thing."
But Nan had a clear intention. "No", she said. "This time I said something different. I was simply telling you how I feel."
For the first time on this issue, he really heard her. There was a moment's silence. Then instead of getting defensive (his usual pattern) he said "Well, actually I've tried to phone a few times. You weren't home." She acknowledged that was so. She felt much better and they then went on to have the best conversation in ages.
The next time someone shouts at you and you don't like it, resist the temptation to withdraw rapidly (maybe slamming the door on the way out). Resist the temptation to shout back to stop the onslaught, and deal with your own rising anger.
This is the time for APPROPRIATE ASSERTIVENESS. Take a deep breath. Stay centred, feet firmly planted on the ground, and get your mind into "I" statement gear. Start mixing a three ingredient recipe:
• When... I hear a voice raised at me
• I feel... humiliated
• And what I'd like is that I... can debate an issue with you without ending up feeling hurt.
The best "I" statement is free of expectations. It is delivering a clean, clear statement of how it is from your side and how you would like it to be.

. Co-operative Power
Responding to Resistance from Others
When faced with a statement that has potential to create conflict, ask open questions to reframe resistance. Explore the difficulties and then re-direct discussion to focus on positive possibilities.
EXPLORE - Clarify Details
It's too expensive.
Compared to what?
Too many/much/little/few.
Compared to what?
I want the best.
What would be best for you?

- Find Options

You can't do that around here.
What would happen if we did?
He (she) would never...
How can we find ways for it to happen?
They always...
Are there any times they don't?
We've tried that already.
What was the outcome?
This is the only way to do it

Yes, that's an option. What else could we consider?

REDIRECT - Move to the Positive
It will never work.
What would it take to make it work?
I won't...
What would make you willing?
It's a failure.
How could it work?
It's disastrous.
What would make it better?
He's (she's) useless.
What is he (she) doing that is acceptable?
It's impossible.
What would it take to make it possible?
I can't.
You can't see a way to do it at the moment?
I don't want to.
What would you like?
- Go Back to Legitimate Needs and Concerns

He's (she's) a hopeless case!
It's hard to see how to work with him (her)?
You fool (and other insults)!
What do we need to do to sort this out?
How dare you do such a thing!
What do you dislike about it?
It should be done my way.
What makes that seem the best option?
His/her place is a pig's sty!
He/she puts a different emphasis on tidiness to you?
He/she doesn't do their fair share.
Where do you think his/her priorities may lie?

Handling Yourself
5 Questions + 5 Goals
Don't indulge
Don't deny
Create richer relationships
when angry/hurt/frightened
Why am I feeling so angry/hurt/frightened?

What do I want to change?

What do I need in order to let go of this feeling?

Whose problem is this, really? How much is mine? How much is theirs?

What is the unspoken message I infer from the situation? (e.g. they don't like me, they don't respect me.)

in communicating emotions
Aim to avoid the desire to punish or blame.

Aim to improve the situation.

Aim to communicate your feelings appropriately.

Aim to improve the relationship and increase communication.

Aim to avoid repeating the same situation.

If communication is not appropriate, what other action can I take?

Handling Others
People's behaviour occurs for a purpose. They are looking for ways to belong, feel significant, and self-protect. When people perceive a threat for their self-esteem, a downward spiral can begin. People can be led into obstructive behaviours in the faulty belief that this will gain them a place of belonging and significance. How we respond to their difficult behaviours can determine how entrenched these become.
The secret is to break out of the spiral by supporting their real needs without supporting their destructive faulty beliefs, and alienating patterns of reaction.
Difficult Behaviour
(and the Faulty Belief Behind It) The Downward Spiral Better Alternatives
Seeking Attention
("I only belong when I am being noticed."),

You feel annoyed and react by coaxing. They stop briefly,, and then resume behaviour and demands,, perhaps in a new way.

Avoid undue attention. Give attention for positive behaviour especially when they are not making a bid for it. Support their real contribution and involvement.

Power Plays
("I only belong when I am in control, when no-one can boss me!"), You feel provoked or threatened and react by fighting or giving in. Their aggression is intensified or they comply defiantly. Disengage from the struggle. Help them to use power constructively by enlisting co-operation. Support their self-worth and autonomy.
Seeking Revenge
("I am significant only if I make others feel hurt like I do.") You feel hurt by them, and retaliate. They seek further revenge more strongly or with another weapon. Convince them that you respect their needs. Build trusting relationships. Support their need for justice and fairness.
Appear Inadequate
("I won't be hurt any more, only if I can convince others not to expect much from me.") You give up, overwhelmed. They respond passively, show no improvement, and stay "victim". Encourage any positive attempt, no matter how small. Focus on assets. Provide bit-sized learning experiences they can succeed at. Support how they feel as a starting place for self-improvement

7. Willingness to Resolve
Projection and Shadow
Does the situation inform or inflame?
The Opportunity
The more someone inflames me, angers or upsets me, the more I know I have something to learn about myself from that person. In particular, I need to see where projection from my shadow side has interfered with my willingness to resolve.
Projection is when we see our own thoughts and feelings in the minds and behaviour of others and not in ourselves. We push something about ourselves out of our awareness and instead see it coming towards us from others. We see that X is angry with us and we feel hurt. We don't recognise that we are angry with X and would like to hurt X. It's very similar to film projection. The movie going on in our heads is projected out onto the people around us. Each of us builds, in this way, a highly personalised world. Greater self- awareness is necessary if we are to see reality.
Persona and Shadow
Psychologist, Carl Jung, used the word "Persona" to describe the conscious aspects of personality, good and bad aspects which are known to the person. Jung called the unknown side of who we are "shadow".
Persona: My self-image.
Things I accept are true about myself. My conscious desires, wants, feelings, intentions and beliefs.

Shadow: Potential I have not unfolded. Aspects of myself I'm not ready to know about. My unconscious wants and dislikes. Emotional responses that are too painful to fully experience. Abilities/ talents I'm not ready to accept or express.

Shadow Hugging and Boxing
Extreme attachment or rejection are both signs that our shadow has us in its hold. If we are overly attached to someone because of desirable qualities that we see in him/her and deny in ourselves we are SHADOW HUGGING. If we are overly rejecting of undesirable qualities in someone or something that we deny in ourselves we are SHADOW BOXING.
The hook the behaviour in the other person that is inflaming me, in itself a neutral event. My projection gets caught on this hook.
The symptom my emotional reaction (usually variations on anger or hurt).
The projection

the part of my shadow that is causing my strong reaction.

To be willing to resolve, we need to acknowledge our projection.
• Suppressed needs e.g. Failing to recognise my need for companionship, I am deeply hurt when a friend postpones time we'd planned to be together.
• Unresolved personal history e.g. If I was seriously let down as a child I may become really wild when people don't do what they promised.
• Unacceptable qualities >e.g. Because I don't accept my own anger, I don't accept it in others.

. Mapping
Define briefly the issue, the problem area, or conflict in neutral terms that all would agree on and that doesn't invite a "yes/no" answer e.g. "Filing" not "Should Sal do filing?"
Alongside Who: write down the name of each important person or group.
Write down each person's or group's needs. What motivates him/her?
Write down each person's or group's concerns, fears or anxieties.
Be prepared to change the statement of the issue, as your understanding of it evolves through discussion or to draw up other maps of related issues that arise.
Issue :

Who :

Needs :

Concerns :

Who :

Needs :

Concerns :

Who :

Needs :

Concerns :

Who :

Needs :

Concerns :

9. Designing Options
What are the range of options? Use the tools below to generate ideas.
Clarifying tools
• Chunking - breaking the problem into smaller parts.
• Researching - more information; extent of resources: constraints.
• Goal-setting - what is the outcome we want?
Generating tools
• The obvious solution - to which all parties say "yes".
• Brainstorming - no censoriing, no justifying, no debating
• Conscensus - buiod a solution together
• Lateral thinking - have we been practical, creative?
Negotiating tools
• Maintain current arrangements - with trade-offs or sweeteners.
• Currencies - what is it easy for me to give and valueable for you to receive?
• Trail and error - try one option, then another
• Establishing alternatives - what will happen if we can't agree?
• Consequesnce confontation - what I will do if we don't agree.
• Is it built on a win/win approach?
• Does it meet many needs of all parties?
• Is it feasible?
• Is it fair?
• Does it solve the problem?
• Can we settle on one option or do we need to trial several?
10. Negotiation skills
Five basic principles
• Be hard on the problem and soft on the person
• Focus on needs, not positions
• Emphasise common ground
• Be inventive about options
• Make clear agreements
Where possible prepare in advance. Consider what your needs are and what the other person's are. Consider outcomes that would address more of what you both want. Commit yourself to a win/win approach, even if tactics used by the other person seem unfair. Be clear that your task will be to steer the negotiation in a positive direction. To do so you may need to do some of the following:
Ask a question to reframe. (e.g. "If we succeed in resolving this problem,. what differences would you notice?" Request checking of understanding. ("Please tell me what you heard me/them say.") Request something she/he said to be re-stated more positively, or as an "I" statement. Re-interpret an attack on the person as an attack on the issue.
Respond not React
• Manage your emotions.
• Let some accusations, attacks, threats or ultimatums pass.
• Make it possible for the other party to back down without feeling humiliated (e.g. by identifying changed circumstances which could justify a changed position on the issue.)
Re-focus on the issue
Maintain the relationship and try to resolve the issue. (e.g. "What's fair for both of us?" Summarise how far you've got. Review common ground and agreement so far. Focus on being partners solving the problem, not opponents. Divide the issue into parts. Address a less difficult aspect when stuck. Invite trading ("If you will, then I will") Explore best and worst alternatives to negotiating an acceptable agreement between you.
Identify Unfair Tactics
Name the behaviour as a tactic. Address the motive for using the tactic. Chance the physical circumstances. Have a break. Change locations, seating arrangements etc. Go into smaller groups. Meet privately. Call for meeting to end now and resume later, perhaps "to give an opportunity for reflection".
11. Third Party Mediation
Attitudes for Mediators
These attitudes are relevant whenever you want to advise, in a conflict which is not your own. It may be a friend telling you about a problem on th telephone. It may an informal chat with both conflicting people. It may be a formally organised mediation session.
1. Be objective - validate both sides, even if privately you prefer one point of view, or even when only one party is present.
2. Be supportive - use caring language. Provide a non-threatening learning environment, where people will feel safe to open up.
3. No judging - actively discourage judgements as to who was right and who was wrong. Don't ask "Why did you?" Ask "What happened?" and "How did you feel?"
4. Steer process, not content - use astute questioning. Encouraging suggestions from participants. Resist advising. If your suggestions are really needed, offer as options not directives.
5. Win/win - work towards wins for both sides. Turn opponents into problem-solving partners.
Mediation Methods
Use the simple, yet effective rules from the "Fighting Fair" poster.
1. Define your mediator role as there to support both people "winning".
2. Get agreement from both people about a basic willingness to fix the problem.
3. Let each person say what the problem is for them. Check back that the other person has actually understood them.
4. Guide the conversation towards a joint problem solving approach and away from personal attack.
5. Encourage them to look for answers where everybody gets what they need.
6. Redirect "Fouls" (Name Calling, Put Downs, Sneering, Blaming, Threats, Bringing up the Past, Making Excuses, Not Listening, Getting Even). Where possible you reframe the negative statement into a neutral description of a legitimate present time concern.
Steps in Mediation
Introductions and agreements Warm up, explanations, agenda if known.
(i) Overview: What is the matter? Each person to express their view of the conflict, the issues and their feelings.
(ii) Details: What is involved? More details. Map needs and concerns. Clarify misperceptions. Identify other relevant issues. Mirroring if needed.
(i) Where are they now? Identify areas of agreement. Encourage willingness to move forward. Caucus if needed.
(ii) Negotiation: Focus on future action. How would they like it to be? What would that take? Develop options. Trading - build wins for everyone.
Completion: Contracting. Plans for the future, including appointed time to review agreement. Closing statements.

12. Broadening Perspectives
Respect and value differences
Just as we are unique and special, so are other people. We all have distinctive viewpoints that may be equally valid from where we stand. Each person's viewpoint makes a contribution to the whole and requires consideration and respect in order to form a complete solution. This wider view can open our eyes to many more possibilities. It may require us to change the mind chatter that says: "For me to be right, others must be wrong."
Recognise a long term timeframe.
Consider how the problem or the relationships will look over a substantial period of time. The longer timeframe can help us be more realistic about the size of the problem we presently face.
Assume a global perspective.
If we believe that the actions of one individual are interconnected with every other individual, then we can have a sense how our actions can have meaning in conjunction with the actions of others. We can look at the overall system, which may be the family, the organisation or the society. Consider what needs this larger unit has in order to function effectively.
Deal with resistance to the broader perspective
Taking up a broader view can be scary. It may make us less certain of the rightness of our own case. We may fear that we will lose all conviction to fight for what we need. We may have to give up the security we got from the simple way we previously saw the problem. We may need courage to enter the confusion of complexity. Many fears of taking the broader perspective prove ungrounded once we analyse them carefully.
Open to the idea of changing and risk-taking
By taking a broader perspective you may be confronted with the enormity of the difficulties. Identify what you can do to affect a particular problem, even if it is only a small step in the right direction. One step forward changes the dynamics and new possibilities can open up.
New Member
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 12:31 pm
Location: famagusta

Postby brother » Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:37 pm

wow...thats a huge post :shock:
User avatar
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K


Return to Meet New People

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests