The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The 100's of villages that were burned down

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby denizaksulu » Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:11 pm

zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Oracle wrote:If the TMT were pressuring the TCs to leave for enclaves (proof of which has been posted many times by others) ... would burning down their villages not be part of this coercion?



In earlier posts on this thread, you can see the house that I was brought up in. It is obvious that it was not burnt down. Only the older part of the two storey part has since collapsed. That was made of mud-brick. I suspect that mudbrick houses need better upkeep.

But there was no excuse for our stone built mosque disappearing into thin air. I had posted a photo of the place where it once stood. Now its a childrens park and planted over.



These people don't understand that we lived through this. People still alive who witnessed all. I really don't understand what Kafenes was looking for when he said that he saw villages prospering. What was he looking for....Smoke after over 40 years. I think the boasting about the amount of money spent to renovate these homes must give some sort of clue to people as to maybe new roofs being put on and replacement of burned out woodwork. We seem to be no nearer an understanding of really went on with the GCs. I hope that this Forum is not representative of the whole.



'Covering tracks' showing the world how 'good' they have been? Exposing 'Turkish Lies'.
These things did happen, but the propaganda machine has got out of hand on both sides. One side tries to cover up and the other tries to 'emphasize'.

After the passage of time, how can you prove these occurences? Only by finding eyewitnesses. They will be dying out soon. I dontsuppose any GC will own up and say, ofcourse NO TC house was destroyed or burnt down. Our home was not burnt down. Not even by TCs as someone tried to claim. Many TCs thought they would be returning, why on earth would they burn their own homes down with all their contents. Its all madness.
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby kafenes » Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:16 am

zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Oracle wrote:If the TMT were pressuring the TCs to leave for enclaves (proof of which has been posted many times by others) ... would burning down their villages not be part of this coercion?



In earlier posts on this thread, you can see the house that I was brought up in. It is obvious that it was not burnt down. Only the older part of the two storey part has since collapsed. That was made of mud-brick. I suspect that mudbrick houses need better upkeep.

But there was no excuse for our stone built mosque disappearing into thin air. I had posted a photo of the place where it once stood. Now its a childrens park and planted over.



These people don't understand that we lived through this. People still alive who witnessed all. I really don't understand what Kafenes was looking for when he said that he saw villages prospering. What was he looking for....Smoke after over 40 years. I think the boasting about the amount of money spent to renovate these homes must give some sort of clue to people as to maybe new roofs being put on and replacement of burned out woodwork. We seem to be no nearer an understanding of really went on with the GCs. I hope that this Forum is not representative of the whole.


I am not saying atrocities didn't happen. I get pissed off at the exaggeration. How many of the 108 villages in the list have you personally visited Zan?
User avatar
kafenes
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 2:43 am
Location: Paphos

Postby Get Real! » Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:44 am

kafenes wrote:
zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Oracle wrote:If the TMT were pressuring the TCs to leave for enclaves (proof of which has been posted many times by others) ... would burning down their villages not be part of this coercion?

In earlier posts on this thread, you can see the house that I was brought up in. It is obvious that it was not burnt down. Only the older part of the two storey part has since collapsed. That was made of mud-brick. I suspect that mudbrick houses need better upkeep.

But there was no excuse for our stone built mosque disappearing into thin air. I had posted a photo of the place where it once stood. Now its a childrens park and planted over.

These people don't understand that we lived through this. People still alive who witnessed all. I really don't understand what Kafenes was looking for when he said that he saw villages prospering. What was he looking for....Smoke after over 40 years. I think the boasting about the amount of money spent to renovate these homes must give some sort of clue to people as to maybe new roofs being put on and replacement of burned out woodwork. We seem to be no nearer an understanding of really went on with the GCs. I hope that this Forum is not representative of the whole.

I am not saying atrocities didn't happen. I get pissed off at the exaggeration. How many of the 108 villages in the list have you personally visited Zan?

This is where they got the “103 villages” story! Yet another credible source…

http://www.tcn-cy.freeuk.com/Special2.htm

Note that the bathtub kids picture is posted again, over and over and over and… (repeat this a few hundred times)


and over and over...


and over and over...


:lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby samarkeolog » Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:01 am

Oracle wrote:If the TMT were pressuring the TCs to leave for enclaves (proof of which has been posted many times by others) ... would burning down their villages not be part of this coercion?


They did conduct a few false flag operations before the restart of conflict in 1963 (and apparently one after it, bombing the Turkish Cypriot Communal Chamber in 1964), but it really is absurd to talk as if the 1963-1964 crisis was the Turkish Cypriots attacking themselves and burning themselves out of their homes. Jack Goodwin (1978: 166) said that Ayios Epiphanios-Soleas was Rauf Denktash's family's village, and it was destroyed and a church and Greek Cypriot National Guard post built on top of it. If it were a false flag operation, it would be an amazing one, creating a military base for his enemy on top of his family's home. If it were a TMT operation to coerce the residents, it would have been Denktash holding a gun to his own head.

kafenes wrote:These villages mentioned in the list are villages which had TC residents who moved out. If a few houses in a couple of these villages were bulldozed, then it was for safety purposes.


And when whole villages were bulldozed, like Agios Epiphanios-Soleas? Still safety?

Lemba was never burned down.


According to Patrick (1976: 90n16), '[b]y 2 January [1964], this Turk-Cypriot village was deserted, looted and burned'. (And I've talked to others who confirm that.)

Pano Arodhes was a mixed village (with less then 10% TCs) and Kato Arodhes was TC with a few GCs. I have just returned from there this morning. Absolutely no TC house was burnt or bulldozed at any time. Until 1974 both communities lived together in harmony, doing business together, attending each others wedding parties etc. So much for Patrick's credibility.


Again, Patrick didn't say that Arodes was burned. He said that it was partially or completely abandoned in 1963-1964, and said that many of the villages in the list were burned. So it doesn't harm his credibility at all, because he never made that claim in the first place.

Tim Drayton wrote:PS - I accept that individual houses and whole quarters of villages were burned down or destroyed in the course of the 1963-1964 disputes, but I have still to hear anybody back up the claim of whole villages being burned or bulldozed by quoting a name.


Agios Epiphanios-Soleas, Pano Koutraphas... There are others. (Plus, why do you accept whole neighbourhoods were destroyed but then decide that the destruction of whole villages is suddenly somehow unbelievable?)

Nikitas wrote:Koutrafas is a place I know. It is up the road from Astromeritis and I walked about the place extensively in 1977 to take pictures of Cyprus adobe construction and also because some of the houses were built by apprentices to my grandfather using molds he gave them.

There were no demolished houses. No signs of destruction. The place was a dirt poor hamlet and the adobe houses were all in bad condition and in a state of neglect, even though people lived in them at the time. After talking with some people there it was evident that they were all in the process of looking for better housing nearer Astromeritis or anywhere near the main tarmac road.

So in the case of Koutrafas at least the assertion that it was bulldozed etc seems to be inaccurate.


Well, you can follow the link and decide for yourself. As I'm sure you know, there are still families, in houses, in Kato Koutraphas, and there are buildings in all states. In Pano Koutraphas, there isn't anything (except for the fountain). There aren't even piles of mud where the homes "decayed". You can see the outlines of the homes in their stone foundations. This is all that's left of Kutrafa Mosque.

Tim Drayton wrote:Well, I have located Yerovasa (Lemesos) on Google Earth. It is true that nothing remains of this village. However, one has to ask what actually happened to it. Apparently at the time of the 1960 census, it had 23 Greek Cypriot and 83 Turkish Cypriot inhabitants.

http://www.peace-cyprus.org/VillagersMe ... gepop.html

It seems that the Greek Cypriots left the village during the ethnic conflict. This was a tiny village in a deserted location on the Troodos foothills. Is it not possible that everybody left for a better life elsewhere? Or perhaps the houses were in a poor state of repair when the inhabitants left in 1974 and have gradually collapsed. This is such an out of the way place set on a winding dirt track that leads from nowhere to nowhere. It beggars belief that anybody would deliberatley come out here and waste their energy destroying the village. For what purpose?


For the same reason they did it elsewhere.

Tim Drayton wrote:Were any whole villages ever destroyed?


See the examples above.

Tim Drayton wrote:Ooops. Been back to Google earth and have found the ruined houses there, too.
Hasan Erçakıca speaks of this as being a destroyed village, implying that this was a deliberate act. Surely this is just an abandoned village gradually falling apart from disrepair?


I read one piece by Ercakica, he talks about places pillaged/plundered (talan edildi), homes' stones and doors torn down (evlerin taslarini ve kapilarini soktu), and yok edilen (Kibrisli) Turk koyleri, which could mean "destroyed Turkish (Cypriot) villages", but could also mean "cleared out" or "emptied" ones.

But none of the official sources of either side are very clear with their words. Sometimes the Greek Cypriot administration talks about churches "destroyed" or "destroyed inside", in ways that would look the same as the villages you think are "decayed". I suspect he was lazy, just using the same word for everything.

And Goodwin (1978: 883) recorded that Yerovasa 'was mainly abandoned in the mid-1960's [sic] because of m[u]d-slides'. (Presumably the rest were driven out by the conflict.) So yes, a lot of the damage to Yerovasa that you can see now was probably natural. Still, it can be difficult to identify what was destroyed deliberately and what decayed naturally - especially after years of natural decay, which could hide deliberate destruction. (For example, Pano Koutraphas is now so overgrown that it looks natural - it doesn't even look like it was a village that later decayed - but it was destroyed.)
samarkeolog
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 259
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:42 pm
Location: London, UK

Postby bill cobbett » Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:06 am

Get Real! wrote:This is where they got the “103 villages” story! Yet another credible source…

http://www.tcn-cy.freeuk.com/Special2.htm

Note that the bathtub kids picture is posted again, over and over and over and… (repeat this a few hundred times)


and over and over...


and over and over...


:lol:


So there we have it. Ten months and twenty pages of debate and the truth is out. This story is a planned and malicious piece of propaganda by agents of the Occupation Regime, published to cause deliberate trouble.

There isn't a shred of truth in the allegation that "hundreds of villages were burnt down", a phrase by which I am sure we would all agree implies whole-scale and systematic razing of whole villages throughout the island. There were certainly (to my mind anyway) a large number of individual houses destroyed but not villages.
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Postby samarkeolog » Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:19 am

bill cobbett wrote:
Get Real! wrote:This is where they got the “103 villages” story! Yet another credible source…

http://www.tcn-cy.freeuk.com/Special2.htm....


So there we have it. Ten months and twenty pages of debate and the truth is out. This story is a planned and malicious piece of propaganda by agents of the Occupation Regime, published to cause deliberate trouble.

There isn't a shred of truth in the allegation that "hundreds of villages were burnt down", a phrase by which I am sure we would all agree implies whole-scale and systematic razing of whole villages throughout the island. There were certainly (to my mind anyway) a large number of individual houses destroyed but not villages.


Richard Patrick was a Canadian UN peacekeeper and political geographer who did his own research and he came up with 102/103, or once you put all of his information together, 107/108. He wasn't part of any occupation or any propaganda. Propagandists may abuse the information he gathered, but his work is good and factual. Don't dismiss his work because other people have abused it. Don't ignore history because some some people misrepresent it. As I have said before, hundreds of villages were not burned down; but most of the 107/108 were. And that is more than bad enough.
samarkeolog
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 259
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 10:42 pm
Location: London, UK

Postby kafenes » Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:12 am

samarkeolog wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:
Get Real! wrote:This is where they got the “103 villages” story! Yet another credible source…

http://www.tcn-cy.freeuk.com/Special2.htm....


So there we have it. Ten months and twenty pages of debate and the truth is out. This story is a planned and malicious piece of propaganda by agents of the Occupation Regime, published to cause deliberate trouble.

There isn't a shred of truth in the allegation that "hundreds of villages were burnt down", a phrase by which I am sure we would all agree implies whole-scale and systematic razing of whole villages throughout the island. There were certainly (to my mind anyway) a large number of individual houses destroyed but not villages.


Richard Patrick was a Canadian UN peacekeeper and political geographer who did his own research and he came up with 102/103, or once you put all of his information together, 107/108. He wasn't part of any occupation or any propaganda. Propagandists may abuse the information he gathered, but his work is good and factual. Don't dismiss his work because other people have abused it. Don't ignore history because some some people misrepresent it. As I have said before, hundreds of villages were not burned down; but most of the 107/108 were. And that is more than bad enough.


OK then, which ones were burnt down? Can you give a list?
User avatar
kafenes
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 2:43 am
Location: Paphos

Postby DT. » Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:43 am

kafenes wrote:
samarkeolog wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:
Get Real! wrote:This is where they got the “103 villages” story! Yet another credible source…

http://www.tcn-cy.freeuk.com/Special2.htm....


So there we have it. Ten months and twenty pages of debate and the truth is out. This story is a planned and malicious piece of propaganda by agents of the Occupation Regime, published to cause deliberate trouble.

There isn't a shred of truth in the allegation that "hundreds of villages were burnt down", a phrase by which I am sure we would all agree implies whole-scale and systematic razing of whole villages throughout the island. There were certainly (to my mind anyway) a large number of individual houses destroyed but not villages.


Richard Patrick was a Canadian UN peacekeeper and political geographer who did his own research and he came up with 102/103, or once you put all of his information together, 107/108. He wasn't part of any occupation or any propaganda. Propagandists may abuse the information he gathered, but his work is good and factual. Don't dismiss his work because other people have abused it. Don't ignore history because some some people misrepresent it. As I have said before, hundreds of villages were not burned down; but most of the 107/108 were. And that is more than bad enough.


OK then, which ones were burnt down? Can you give a list?


more importantly does Patrick have a list?
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12682
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Tim Drayton » Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:33 pm

samarkeolog wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:
Get Real! wrote:This is where they got the “103 villages” story! Yet another credible source…

http://www.tcn-cy.freeuk.com/Special2.htm....


So there we have it. Ten months and twenty pages of debate and the truth is out. This story is a planned and malicious piece of propaganda by agents of the Occupation Regime, published to cause deliberate trouble.

There isn't a shred of truth in the allegation that "hundreds of villages were burnt down", a phrase by which I am sure we would all agree implies whole-scale and systematic razing of whole villages throughout the island. There were certainly (to my mind anyway) a large number of individual houses destroyed but not villages.


Richard Patrick was a Canadian UN peacekeeper and political geographer who did his own research and he came up with 102/103, or once you put all of his information together, 107/108. He wasn't part of any occupation or any propaganda. Propagandists may abuse the information he gathered, but his work is good and factual. Don't dismiss his work because other people have abused it. Don't ignore history because some some people misrepresent it. As I have said before, hundreds of villages were not burned down; but most of the 107/108 were. And that is more than bad enough.


Richard Patrick's list is in your own words a "list of villages abandoned by Turkish Cypriots in 1963-1964". Even this statement is misleading because a great many of the villages listed were mixed - it includes, for example, Fasoula which as far as I know contains four TC owned houses - so that these particular villages were not in fact wholly abandoned as the wording implies, and would hardly have been burned down in their entirety if Greek Cypriots were still living there. You say that "most of the 107/108 were [burned down]", but provide no evidence. We are really back to square one.
User avatar
Tim Drayton
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8799
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:32 am
Location: Limassol/Lemesos

Postby halil » Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:43 pm

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=hHm57MKh-Ac

http://martinwilliamhill.fotopic.net/c1459049.html

few days later i will come to this topic again . In these days i am very bussy with my projects .

Tim , if you go back few pages back you can see the maps .... read what it says on the maps .
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests