Cyprus-Forum.com

[joe]

Intelligence officers confirm Kissinger role in Turkish invasion

Larisa Alexandrovna and Muriel Kane
Published: Wednesday June 27, 2007



Release of CIA’s ‘Family Jewels’ provides insight into political juggernaut and Bush Administration adviser

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger pushed for the 1974 Turkish invasion of Cyprus and allowed arms

Full story below:
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Intellige ... _0626.html

[the_snake_and_the_crane]

You never see Turkish Cypriots replying to these posts of clear evidence.

They always reply to the hearsay and propaganda ones.

[zan]

Snaky, snaky snaky.. I bet you did not see the bit about "Because of the Greek coup" did you. Wanking makes you go word blind you know. I hope you washed your hands before you started typing.....

[the_snake_and_the_crane]

...and who put the Greek junta into power???

At least I can get it up Zan

[zan]

...and who put the Greek junta into power???

At least I can get it up Zan

Go on then tell us. Is that in another released report or are you going to guess.




(I don't think this is allowed but here is some porn for you...Knock yourself out kid..http://elfwood.lysator.liu.se/farp/hand/)

[souroul]

zan... according to those documents, the cia wanted to save the turkish cypriots because the barbarian greeks violated all the aggreements they made with the uk and turkey eh? since when did the cia gave two shits about you, me, or anyone for that matter. so why would the cia do what it did? tell us what you think

[yiannisP]

Go on then tell us. Is that in another released report or are you going to guess.

I would have thought people could see through imperialist tactics by now. Just as Saddam Hussein was installed by the West so was the fascist Greek junta. The CIA have a history of deposing democratically elected governments. You think Britain and America became so dominant in the world by asking other nations whether they could 'please come and have a piece of their land?' No. They create the problems so they can provide the solutions (solutions that give them everything and leave everyone else fooked)

I will tell you how America and Britain got a piece of Cyprus.

The CIA were instrumental in preventing George Papandreou from being re-elected and staging the coup that brought in the fascist Greek Junta. Do you see what they did now? Henry Kissinger used a justification for invading Cyprus which the CIA had themeselves been instrumental in creating!
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/Greece_KH.html

"During Avrakotos's time in Greece, the CIA was instrumental in destroying Greek freedom and helping to turn the country into probably the single most anti-American democracy on Earth today. Incredibly, Crile describes this as follows: "On April 21, 1967, he [Avrakotos] got one of those breaks that can make a career. A military junta seized power in Athens that day and suspended democratic and constitutional government." Avrakotos became the CIA's chief liaison with the Greek colonels. After the fall of the colonels' brutally fascist regime, the 17 November terrorist organization assassinated the CIA's Athens station chief, Richard Welch, on Dec. 23, 1975, and "Gust came to be vilified in the Greek radical press as the sinister force responsible for most of the country's many ills." He left the country in 1978 but could not get another decent assignment." http://hnn.us/articles/1491.html

the cia wanted to save the turkish cypriots because the barbarian greeks violated all the aggreements they made with the uk and turkey eh?

Read the articles I have posted above. The CIA is an inherently corrupt agency that has much of its activities and budget shielded from congress. They gather intelligence on matters of US interest while at the same time funding/helping to stage coups against democratically elected regimes. It only appears to give a shit about people to justify its policy to those outside its circle. In fact there is only one reason behind their actions and that is what is in the interests of the CIA/USA.

[cypezokyli]

just to make things clear.
ofcource the USA organised coups all over the world, and ofcource they dont give a shit about innocent people.

in the case of cyprus, there is not enough evidence that suggests that the US organised the whole thing.
there is also no evidence that suggests that the US has or had anything to win from the invasion.

what there is evidence of is that they had information about it..... the reaction of state department was: is really ioanides such a moron, that he expects that a coup will not cause a turkish reaction ? unfortunately the stupidity of ioannides is beyond my understanding.

the US after shit hit the fun, had only one objective : to avoid war between greece and turkey.
it made no difference for them, if cyprus united with greece, or turkey invaded.
when they had interests that turkey should not invade cyprus, they prevented it.
in 74 things changed, since the Soviet Union also didnot give a shit about cyprus anymore.

the only way one can blame the US, is by taking an "ethical path". that they as a super power had a "moral duty to prevent the coup and the coming invasion".

if one sees Iraq and still expects "moralities" .....

...............
read also :
United States Policy towards Cyprus, 1954–1974: Removing the Greek-Turkish Bone of Contention. By Claude Nicolet. (Mannheim: Bibliopolis, 2001. 483 pp. € 42.90, ISBN 3-933925-20-7.)

it seriously questions numerous myths that exist in cyprus about the american foreign policy.......

[zan]

zan... according to those documents, the cia wanted to save the turkish cypriots because the barbarian greeks violated all the aggreements they made with the uk and turkey eh? since when did the cia gave two shits about you, me, or anyone for that matter. so why would the cia do what it did? tell us what you think

I think Cypezokili has answered your post and the one from yiannisP and I never said anything containing the word barbarian......only murderous..

[souroul]

hm.. the us didnt organize the whole thing and they had nothing to win.. ok. so kissinger woke up one day with nothing to do and was like.. hell, lets give the turks guns and tell them to invade cyprus.

just to make things clear.
ofcource the USA organised coups all over the world, and ofcource they dont give a shit about innocent people.

in the case of cyprus, there is not enough evidence that suggests that the US organised the whole thing.
there is also no evidence that suggests that the US has or had anything to win from the invasion.

what there is evidence of is that they had information about it..... the reaction of state department was: is really ioanides such a moron, that he expects that a coup will not cause a turkish reaction ? unfortunately the stupidity of ioannides is beyond my understanding.

the US after shit hit the fun, had only one objective : to avoid war between greece and turkey.
it made no difference for them, if cyprus united with greece, or turkey invaded.
when they had interests that turkey should not invade cyprus, they prevented it.
in 74 things changed, since the Soviet Union also didnot give a shit about cyprus anymore.

the only way one can blame the US, is by taking an "ethical path". that they as a super power had a "moral duty to prevent the coup and the coming invasion".

if one sees Iraq and still expects "moralities" .....

...............
read also :
United States Policy towards Cyprus, 1954–1974: Removing the Greek-Turkish Bone of Contention. By Claude Nicolet. (Mannheim: Bibliopolis, 2001. 483 pp. € 42.90, ISBN 3-933925-20-7.)

it seriously questions numerous myths that exist in cyprus about the american foreign policy.......