The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Britain definitely caused the Cyprus problem

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby denizaksulu » Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:38 pm

phoenix wrote:
zan wrote:
phoenix wrote:
zan wrote:
Eliko wrote:
purdey wrote:Maybe the lady should show a little more respect to countries that have helped her,and people who have done her no harm.


I think it is quite inconceivable for any person who has spent any length of time in the U.K. (I assume Phoenix has) to state that they have not suffered at some time or other from some injustice there.

Currently, the indigenous population is being sytematically robbed by those who are supposed to protect them.

Their general living standards have been reduced to such an extent (in some cases) that were it not for the cheap cans of beans available at 'Tesco' stores, a considerable amount of them would face malnutrition.

Great Britain 2008, taxed beyond endurance, small wonder that so many of it's subjects are opting for a better life in Cyprus.

I only hope they will leave their unfortunate attitude (in some cases only) back home on the sinking ship where it belongs. :wink:


And those that enjoyed the fruitful times leave the rest of us to pick up their bill.........And become foreigners in someone else's country....


Listen Zan, I have never once been a burden to the UK ... even my education was paid for by an American Company who wanted the fruits of my Patents ....

The UK is still doing very well out of me ... which means you are too! :roll:



Errrr! Thank you :? Yet again you misconstrue what I said.......I am having a go at those English that leave the UK and think they have a right to live anywhere in the world because they are English and then turn around and have a go at their own country for letting in too many foreigners. Foreigners having a go at foreigners.... :roll: :roll: :roll: Relax love...You went home but are an ungrateful foreigner... :? :?


Zan, where you seriously not having ago at me? :shock:

Where you on my side? :D

(Shit, now I said more than I should .... time to get some nourishment methinks , mmmm!)



Agreed that you should get some nourishment Phoenix. Your spelling mistakes rise with the decline in your blood glucose levels.
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby zan » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:07 am

Anyway....Back to the subject.........The Brits were to blame...I don't think so..They even warned of the consequences of ENOSIS....

Churchill's response

Let me give you a historic example on the issue. In 1907, Sir Winston S. Churchill of Britain plans to pay a visit to the island. Cypriot Greek member of the Kavanin Assembly, Bishop Kyrillos, reminds Churchill that Greek Cypriots expect a British surprise and permission to the annexation of the island as Britain entertained them with the annexation of seven Aegean islands in the past. Churchill in short responds to Kyrillos that the ruling of the island rests with the Ottoman and Turks may want the same thing as the Greek Cypriots do. Isn't this a marvelous answer?
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby denizaksulu » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:14 am

zan wrote:Anyway....Back to the subject.........The Brits were to blame...I don't think so..They even warned of the consequences of ENOSIS....

Churchill's response

Let me give you a historic example on the issue. In 1907, Sir Winston S. Churchill of Britain plans to pay a visit to the island. Cypriot Greek member of the Kavanin Assembly, Bishop Kyrillos, reminds Churchill that Greek Cypriots expect a British surprise and permission to the annexation of the island as Britain entertained them with the annexation of seven Aegean islands in the past. Churchill in short responds to Kyrillos that the ruling of the island rests with the Ottoman and Turks may want the same thing as the Greek Cypriots do. Isn't this a marvelous answer?



I bet Churchill did not say those words out of love for the Turks or Ottomans. Mind you it was well before his defeat at Chanakkale. It just did not suit the interests of GB.
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby zan » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:18 am

denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:Anyway....Back to the subject.........The Brits were to blame...I don't think so..They even warned of the consequences of ENOSIS....

Churchill's response

Let me give you a historic example on the issue. In 1907, Sir Winston S. Churchill of Britain plans to pay a visit to the island. Cypriot Greek member of the Kavanin Assembly, Bishop Kyrillos, reminds Churchill that Greek Cypriots expect a British surprise and permission to the annexation of the island as Britain entertained them with the annexation of seven Aegean islands in the past. Churchill in short responds to Kyrillos that the ruling of the island rests with the Ottoman and Turks may want the same thing as the Greek Cypriots do. Isn't this a marvelous answer?



I bet Churchill did not say those words out of love for the Turks or Ottomans. Mind you it was well before his defeat at Chanakkale. It just did not suit the interests of GB.


It turns out that ENOSIS did not suit anyone Deniz.......Then, now or ever...
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby denizaksulu » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:21 am

zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:Anyway....Back to the subject.........The Brits were to blame...I don't think so..They even warned of the consequences of ENOSIS....

Churchill's response

Let me give you a historic example on the issue. In 1907, Sir Winston S. Churchill of Britain plans to pay a visit to the island. Cypriot Greek member of the Kavanin Assembly, Bishop Kyrillos, reminds Churchill that Greek Cypriots expect a British surprise and permission to the annexation of the island as Britain entertained them with the annexation of seven Aegean islands in the past. Churchill in short responds to Kyrillos that the ruling of the island rests with the Ottoman and Turks may want the same thing as the Greek Cypriots do. Isn't this a marvelous answer?



I bet Churchill did not say those words out of love for the Turks or Ottomans. Mind you it was well before his defeat at Chanakkale. It just did not suit the interests of GB.


It turns out that ENOSIS did not suit anyone Deniz.......Then, now or ever...


Ofcourse not. Even the more intelligent GCs know that now - I think. :lol:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby zan » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:23 am

denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:Anyway....Back to the subject.........The Brits were to blame...I don't think so..They even warned of the consequences of ENOSIS....

Churchill's response

Let me give you a historic example on the issue. In 1907, Sir Winston S. Churchill of Britain plans to pay a visit to the island. Cypriot Greek member of the Kavanin Assembly, Bishop Kyrillos, reminds Churchill that Greek Cypriots expect a British surprise and permission to the annexation of the island as Britain entertained them with the annexation of seven Aegean islands in the past. Churchill in short responds to Kyrillos that the ruling of the island rests with the Ottoman and Turks may want the same thing as the Greek Cypriots do. Isn't this a marvelous answer?



I bet Churchill did not say those words out of love for the Turks or Ottomans. Mind you it was well before his defeat at Chanakkale. It just did not suit the interests of GB.


It turns out that ENOSIS did not suit anyone Deniz.......Then, now or ever...


Ofcourse not. Even the more intelligent GCs know that now - I think. :lol:


What you mean Bananiot and Miltiades...Can't think of any more just now but Kikapu is not one of them....
:wink: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby denizaksulu » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:33 am

zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:Anyway....Back to the subject.........The Brits were to blame...I don't think so..They even warned of the consequences of ENOSIS....

Churchill's response

Let me give you a historic example on the issue. In 1907, Sir Winston S. Churchill of Britain plans to pay a visit to the island. Cypriot Greek member of the Kavanin Assembly, Bishop Kyrillos, reminds Churchill that Greek Cypriots expect a British surprise and permission to the annexation of the island as Britain entertained them with the annexation of seven Aegean islands in the past. Churchill in short responds to Kyrillos that the ruling of the island rests with the Ottoman and Turks may want the same thing as the Greek Cypriots do. Isn't this a marvelous answer?



I bet Churchill did not say those words out of love for the Turks or Ottomans. Mind you it was well before his defeat at Chanakkale. It just did not suit the interests of GB.


It turns out that ENOSIS did not suit anyone Deniz.......Then, now or ever...


Ofcourse not. Even the more intelligent GCs know that now - I think. :lol:


What you mean Bananiot and Miltiades...Can't think of any more just now but Kikapu is not one of them....
:wink: :lol: :lol:



Kikapu one of them? I had no idea.

Do you mean he has been fooling us all this time? :roll: :roll:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby zan » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:42 am

denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:Anyway....Back to the subject.........The Brits were to blame...I don't think so..They even warned of the consequences of ENOSIS....

Churchill's response

Let me give you a historic example on the issue. In 1907, Sir Winston S. Churchill of Britain plans to pay a visit to the island. Cypriot Greek member of the Kavanin Assembly, Bishop Kyrillos, reminds Churchill that Greek Cypriots expect a British surprise and permission to the annexation of the island as Britain entertained them with the annexation of seven Aegean islands in the past. Churchill in short responds to Kyrillos that the ruling of the island rests with the Ottoman and Turks may want the same thing as the Greek Cypriots do. Isn't this a marvelous answer?



I bet Churchill did not say those words out of love for the Turks or Ottomans. Mind you it was well before his defeat at Chanakkale. It just did not suit the interests of GB.


It turns out that ENOSIS did not suit anyone Deniz.......Then, now or ever...


Ofcourse not. Even the more intelligent GCs know that now - I think. :lol:


What you mean Bananiot and Miltiades...Can't think of any more just now but Kikapu is not one of them....
:wink: :lol: :lol:



Kikapu one of them? I had no idea.

Do you mean he has been fooling us all this time? :roll: :roll:



Well he never answered my question about him discovering that his family were actually Greek converts and that is why he is the way he is and that he has converted back so ................ :wink:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby denizaksulu » Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:47 am

zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:Anyway....Back to the subject.........The Brits were to blame...I don't think so..They even warned of the consequences of ENOSIS....

Churchill's response

Let me give you a historic example on the issue. In 1907, Sir Winston S. Churchill of Britain plans to pay a visit to the island. Cypriot Greek member of the Kavanin Assembly, Bishop Kyrillos, reminds Churchill that Greek Cypriots expect a British surprise and permission to the annexation of the island as Britain entertained them with the annexation of seven Aegean islands in the past. Churchill in short responds to Kyrillos that the ruling of the island rests with the Ottoman and Turks may want the same thing as the Greek Cypriots do. Isn't this a marvelous answer?



I bet Churchill did not say those words out of love for the Turks or Ottomans. Mind you it was well before his defeat at Chanakkale. It just did not suit the interests of GB.


It turns out that ENOSIS did not suit anyone Deniz.......Then, now or ever...


Ofcourse not. Even the more intelligent GCs know that now - I think. :lol:


What you mean Bananiot and Miltiades...Can't think of any more just now but Kikapu is not one of them....
:wink: :lol: :lol:



Kikapu one of them? I had no idea.

Do you mean he has been fooling us all this time? :roll: :roll:



Well he never answered my question about him discovering that his family were actually Greek converts and that is why he is the way he is and that he has converted back so ................ :wink:



I had no idea. But why doesnt he come clean about it. Everything he says makes more sense now. Can you get 'double-Lino-Bambakoi'? :lol:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby zan » Tue Jan 29, 2008 2:02 am

denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
zan wrote:Anyway....Back to the subject.........The Brits were to blame...I don't think so..They even warned of the consequences of ENOSIS....

Churchill's response

Let me give you a historic example on the issue. In 1907, Sir Winston S. Churchill of Britain plans to pay a visit to the island. Cypriot Greek member of the Kavanin Assembly, Bishop Kyrillos, reminds Churchill that Greek Cypriots expect a British surprise and permission to the annexation of the island as Britain entertained them with the annexation of seven Aegean islands in the past. Churchill in short responds to Kyrillos that the ruling of the island rests with the Ottoman and Turks may want the same thing as the Greek Cypriots do. Isn't this a marvelous answer?



I bet Churchill did not say those words out of love for the Turks or Ottomans. Mind you it was well before his defeat at Chanakkale. It just did not suit the interests of GB.


It turns out that ENOSIS did not suit anyone Deniz.......Then, now or ever...


Ofcourse not. Even the more intelligent GCs know that now - I think. :lol:


What you mean Bananiot and Miltiades...Can't think of any more just now but Kikapu is not one of them....
:wink: :lol: :lol:



Kikapu one of them? I had no idea.

Do you mean he has been fooling us all this time? :roll: :roll:



Well he never answered my question about him discovering that his family were actually Greek converts and that is why he is the way he is and that he has converted back so ................ :wink:



I had no idea. But why doesnt he come clean about it. Everything he says makes more sense now. Can you get 'double-Lino-Bambakoi'? :lol:



:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest