Cyprus-Forum.com

[Paphitis]

By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested from all his work.

3 Then God blessed the seventh day and made it holy, because on it he rested from all the work of creating that he had done.

Adam and Eve

4 This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, when the Lord God made the earth and the heavens.

5 Now no shrub had yet appeared on the earth[a] and no plant had yet sprung up, for the Lord God had not sent rain on the earth and there was no one to work the ground,

6 but streams[b] came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground.

7 Then the Lord God formed a man[c] from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.

God rested on the 7th day and gave man the breath of life afterwards.

A blink of gods eye is equal to 1000 years.

Is that what you just made up? How do you know this?

Atheists don't have the luxury of making things up as they go!

[Maximus]

Made up what?

[Paphitis]

Made up what?

the 1000 Year with a single blink nonsense!

[Maximus]

2 Peter 3:8 However, let this one fact not be escaping YOUR notice, beloved ones, that one day is with Jehovah as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day

You don't take the bible literally.

Religion is not scientific.

[Maximus]

Here is another one,

Psalms. 90:4 A thousand years are in your eyes but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch during the night.

[Paphitis]

2 Peter 3:8 However, let this one fact not be escaping YOUR notice, beloved ones, that one day is with Jehovah as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day

You don't take the bible literally.

Religion is not scientific.

there we go again. we take everything else literally.

you are the first to scrutinize Scientists and will be the first to jump on their case as soon as they leave an open ended question.

But Christians seem to have a charmed existence to defy all the lies of the universe and logic and without being held accountable because you are not suppose to take it literally!


Yeh right!

[Paphitis]

Here is another one,

Psalms. 90:4 A thousand years are in your eyes but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch during the night.

That makes no sense to me!

so much open to a heck of a lot of interpretation. once again, we do not have this luxury!

[Maximus]

Where have I been the first to scrutinize scientists?

I accept the big bang theory. Science just does not tell us who or what created it. Science tells us that something was created out of nothing just like the book of Genesis.

[Paphitis]

Where have I been the first to scrutinize scientists?

I accept the big bang theory. Science just does not tell us who or what created it. Science tells us that something was created out of nothing just like the book of Genesis.

Not you specifically.

But your second sentence is interesting. You believe in the Big Bang but Scientists don't need to prove what they are incapable of right now or make things up to plug the holes.

furthermore, there is a thing called Quantum Physics and Physics has proven that their can never be nothing because infinity can't exist. You just don't know the science enough as I don't either when it comes to Quantum Physics or the Bosson particle. There was never a NOTHING, and there was a mass of sub atomic particles which expanded and contracted.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics

[Maximus]

From a scientific perspective I believe it and although a lot of it goes well over my head, another scientist could disprove it if the proof provided is unsubstantiated.

If you are going to employ science to explain something then it has to be precise because chemistry, mathematics and physics are involved.

Religion and science are two different subjects. Religion is more of an art and science is science.