The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


German aircraft crash

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Re: German aircraft crash

Postby Paphitis » Sat Apr 04, 2015 8:06 pm

Basically people, Miltiades is a great advocate for this germanwings Media Circus.

Here he is, telling us how disgusted he is how a pilot killed 149 people. :roll:

Image

Every media circus needs a leading clown.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: German aircraft crash

Postby miltiades » Sat Apr 04, 2015 8:19 pm

Why pretend then that you are a pilot ? Are you ashamed to be a ..steward ?
If you are a pilot then I'm an ...astronaut.

By the way, on which airline are you a ... pilot ? MY FOOT !!
Mate you have been found out, you are no more a pilot than ...Lordo, next time you decide to take a poke at Miltiades bear in mind that you are still wet behind the ears !
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: German aircraft crash

Postby Paphitis » Sat Apr 04, 2015 8:20 pm

miltiades wrote:Why pretend then that you are a pilot ? Are you ashamed to be a ..steward ?
If you are a pilot then I'm an ...astronaut.

By the way, on which airline are you a ... pilot ? MY FOOT !!
Mate you have been found out, you are no more a pilot than ...Lordo, next time you decide to take a poke at Miltiades bear in mind that you are still wet behind the ears !


No I am not ashamed of being a steward. Love stewards completely and look up to them as an important and critical part of the team.

I would be ashamed if I was a crusty old pots and pans salesman. You should be the last person to be having a dig at Flight Attendants. You can't be serious now, could you? :lol:

Now go sell some cheap Chinese cookware and then book a cheap flight on Helios. That's a good boy. :lol:
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: German aircraft crash

Postby miltiades » Sat Apr 04, 2015 8:36 pm

Paphitis wrote:
miltiades wrote:Why pretend then that you are a pilot ? Are you ashamed to be a ..steward ?
If you are a pilot then I'm an ...astronaut.

By the way, on which airline are you a ... pilot ? MY FOOT !!
Mate you have been found out, you are no more a pilot than ...Lordo, next time you decide to take a poke at Miltiades bear in mind that you are still wet behind the ears !


No I am not ashamed of being a steward. Love stewards completely and look up to them as an important and critical part of the team.

I would be ashamed if I was a crusty old pots and pans salesman. You should be the last person to be having a dig at Flight Attendants. You can't be serious now, could you? :lol:

Now go sell some cheap Chinese cookware and then book a cheap flight on Helios. That's a good boy. :lol:

So you are not a ...pilot, at long last you admit that you are a ...steward.

I'm proud of my business, I don't pretend to be anything other than what I am. You on the other hand is pretending to be some supersonic ...pilot !! Mate, don't be ashamed of being a steward, its a job, someone has to do it.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Re: German aircraft crash

Postby Pyrpolizer » Sat Apr 04, 2015 10:33 pm

..
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12892
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: German aircraft crash

Postby Kikapu » Sat Apr 04, 2015 11:05 pm

Paphitis,
Do you know whether or not when the Germanwings plane hit the mountain, did it explode into a ball of fire or not? From what I've seen of the crash site, it does not seem to appear that there was any fire or any smoke from smouldering debris. Helicopters found the crash site fairly quickly and yet I do not remember seeing any smoke at all, let alone any fire. Just curious.

As for having any new regulation to have the pilots go through psychological test every time they have their routine physical checks and with the new rule to have "2 in the cockpit", it will mean having ALL the flight attendants also go through psychological test frequently since one of them will need to be in the cockpit when one of the pilots leave to take a piss, if there are only two pilots on the flight deck. The regulators will need to be very careful not to get too carried away by adding more stress onto the flight crewmembers than they already have at the present time.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 17977
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Re: German aircraft crash

Postby Pyrpolizer » Sat Apr 04, 2015 11:52 pm

miltiades wrote:From the very start it was ESTABLISHED that one sick pilot committed this hideous acts. Personally I don't give a toss if the investigators did or did not follow correct procedures. The victims are the 149 innocent passengers and their bereaved families. Who cares if the correct, according to Paphitis, procedures were followed or not. One mentally unstable sick bastard decided to end his miserable life and that of 149 passengers. To hell with protocol and the nonsense spouted by Paphitis, passengers have a right to demand that a fucking psycho is not in charge of their lives.
The media reported correctly. Paphitis, you are out of order, nobody gives a shit whether the media or the investigators were premature in their announcements. The fact of the matter is that one sick bastard, hoodwinked the system, a system that has to be vigorously tightened, a system that demands and expects absolute safety. Paphitis seems to be more concerned with splitting hairs than the real issue, in that any sick individual can again commit what this sick fucker did.


Well look at it this way Milti. Suppose the airlines so as you suggest, and the pilots disagree and go on international strike.
Then the problem of how you return from Belarus will be all yours. :lol:
You will most probably need to take ship. It won't take you 3 hours to return to London but 3 weeks :mrgreen:
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12892
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: German aircraft crash

Postby Paphitis » Sun Apr 05, 2015 2:10 am

Kikapu wrote:Paphitis,
Do you know whether or not when the Germanwings plane hit the mountain, did it explode into a ball of fire or not? From what I've seen of the crash site, it does not seem to appear that there was any fire or any smoke from smouldering debris. Helicopters found the crash site fairly quickly and yet I do not remember seeing any smoke at all, let alone any fire. Just curious.

As for having any new regulation to have the pilots go through psychological test every time they have their routine physical checks and with the new rule to have "2 in the cockpit", it will mean having ALL the flight attendants also go through psychological test frequently since one of them will need to be in the cockpit when one of the pilots leave to take a piss, if there are only two pilots on the flight deck. The regulators will need to be very careful not to get too carried away by adding more stress onto the flight crewmembers than they already have at the present time.


Kikapu, the aircraft hit at a speed of about 700km/hr, hence the devastation seen at the crash site. Bodies were not recovered, oh body parts.

I am sure there would have been some fire, but JETA1 has an extremely high flashpoint. You can throw a cigarette into a bucket full of the stuff and it will still not ignite unless there were a lot of fumes.

And yes, there are so many gaps and potential new hazards for such things as the "rule of 2". What if the Flight Attendant just split for their boyfriend and wanted to kill 150 passengers? You are correct in saying that thatIght Attendants will also need to go through the same assessments which will also bring into play the much larger Transport Workers Union. AFAP and TWU means a huge headache for the fly by nighter legislators.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: German aircraft crash

Postby Kikapu » Sun Apr 05, 2015 10:17 am

Pyrpolizer wrote:
miltiades wrote:From the very start it was ESTABLISHED that one sick pilot committed this hideous acts. Personally I don't give a toss if the investigators did or did not follow correct procedures. The victims are the 149 innocent passengers and their bereaved families. Who cares if the correct, according to Paphitis, procedures were followed or not. One mentally unstable sick bastard decided to end his miserable life and that of 149 passengers. To hell with protocol and the nonsense spouted by Paphitis, passengers have a right to demand that a fucking psycho is not in charge of their lives.
The media reported correctly. Paphitis, you are out of order, nobody gives a shit whether the media or the investigators were premature in their announcements. The fact of the matter is that one sick bastard, hoodwinked the system, a system that has to be vigorously tightened, a system that demands and expects absolute safety. Paphitis seems to be more concerned with splitting hairs than the real issue, in that any sick individual can again commit what this sick fucker did.


Well look at it this way Milti. Suppose the airlines so as you suggest, and the pilots disagree and go on international strike.
Then the problem of how you return from Belarus will be all yours. :lol:
You will most probably need to take ship. It won't take you 3 hours to return to London but 3 weeks :mrgreen:


By the sounds of it, Milti will be happy to stay in Belarus until the strike is over, and even beyond! :wink:
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 17977
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Re: German aircraft crash

Postby Kikapu » Sun Apr 05, 2015 10:25 am

Paphitis wrote:
Kikapu wrote:Paphitis,
Do you know whether or not when the Germanwings plane hit the mountain, did it explode into a ball of fire or not? From what I've seen of the crash site, it does not seem to appear that there was any fire or any smoke from smouldering debris. Helicopters found the crash site fairly quickly and yet I do not remember seeing any smoke at all, let alone any fire. Just curious.

As for having any new regulation to have the pilots go through psychological test every time they have their routine physical checks and with the new rule to have "2 in the cockpit", it will mean having ALL the flight attendants also go through psychological test frequently since one of them will need to be in the cockpit when one of the pilots leave to take a piss, if there are only two pilots on the flight deck. The regulators will need to be very careful not to get too carried away by adding more stress onto the flight crewmembers than they already have at the present time.


Kikapu, the aircraft hit at a speed of about 700km/hr, hence the devastation seen at the crash site. Bodies were not recovered, oh body parts.

I am sure there would have been some fire, but JETA1 has an extremely high flashpoint. You can throw a cigarette into a bucket full of the stuff and it will still not ignite unless there were a lot of fumes.

And yes, there are so many gaps and potential new hazards for such things as the "rule of 2". What if the Flight Attendant just split for their boyfriend and wanted to kill 150 passengers? You are correct in saying that thatIght Attendants will also need to go through the same assessments which will also bring into play the much larger Transport Workers Union. AFAP and TWU means a huge headache for the fly by nighter legislators.


When we saw the planes hitting the world trade centers on 9/11, doing about the same speeds as the Germanwings aircraft, there were huge explosions. Then again, there were many things to cause sparks at the buildings, such as metal contruction frames and electricity vs. just the mountain.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 17977
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests