The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Propose and discuss specific solutions to aspects of the Cyprus Problem

Are views expressed by Paphitis on ANYTHING reasonable

Poll ended at Fri Mar 16, 2018 3:28 pm
Note: Your vote in this poll is NOT confidential. Your username will be displayed under the option(s) you select

1. Yes they are.
2
33%
 
Get Real!, Schnauzer
2. No they are a load of old cobblers.
1
17%
 
miltiades
3.
3
50%
 
GreekIslandGirl, kurupetos, repulsewarrior
 
Total votes : 6

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby B25 » Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:21 am

Paphitis wrote:We can not be complicit with a regime that kills his own people and commits war crimes against The Geneva Convention and other Crimes Against Humanity. This is a very big deal for us.


What 2 faced double standards are these. Turkey is doing just that in Cyprus and to the Kurds, why aren't your buddies bombing Turkey??? Seems the coalition likes the taste of Turkish villo, get ready to swallow mate.

Another crock of shit Paph, give it a rest will ya!

Yet more proof that the US is deep throating Turkey, cowards, looks like they feared the Turkish slap!!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/mi ... 93d1402186
Last edited by B25 on Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6245
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby Paphitis » Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:26 am

B25 wrote:
Paphitis wrote:We can not be complicit with a regime that kills his own people and commits war crimes against The Geneva Convention and other Crimes Against Humanity. This is a very big deal for us.


What 2 faced double standards are these. Turkey is doing just that in Cyprus and to the Kurds, why aren't your buddies bombing Turkey??? Seems the coalition likes the taste of Turkish villo, get ready to swallow mate.

Another crock of shit Paph, give it a rest will ya!


I told you before, Turkey is a NATO member.

No one is going to start bombing Turkey because if they do, the NATO Treaty becomes worthless and quite possibly disintegrate. It's not in their interest.

Turkey has ethnically cleansed a third of the island. That is true. But you also have peace on the island, so don't expect anyone to just go all Rambo into Cyprus.

Syria on the other hand, is a humanitarian catastrophe that has been unseen in our world since WW2 and is being played out in real time today. Whilst what Turkey did is bad and against International law, they didn't use Sarin Gas either.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23016
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby B25 » Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:31 am

No, they just used Napalm. Perhaps this is more acceptable to you??
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6245
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby Paphitis » Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:41 am

Sorry I made a huge mistake by mentioning that Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Oman, Bahrain were possibly sponsors of Islamic State.

That is incorrect. Islamic State and saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Oman, Jordan and Bahrain were major enemies.

In fact, Saudi Arabia was islamic State's public enemy number one.
\
The proxies were as follows:

Islamic State: Qatar and possibly Turkey

Free Syrian Army: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Jordan, Oman, Bahrain, USA and Coalition

Turkmen: Turkey

Hezbollah: Russia, Syria and Iran.

Qatar was the main backer of Islamic State.

The Coalition only backed the FSA (late in the piece) and then the SDF + Peshmerga and other Kurdish Groups. Coalition was never complicit with Islamic State at any time.

It is complete STUPIDITY to suggest that the West created Islamic State.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23016
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby Paphitis » Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:50 am

B25 wrote:No, they just used Napalm. Perhaps this is more acceptable to you??


Yes, and so did USA and Australia in Vietnam only a few years earlier. They also used Agent Orange.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23016
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby Robin Hood » Tue Mar 13, 2018 2:38 pm

Here you are Paphitis another wild claim by a member of your coalition....... once again they don’t actually have any evidence but they will threaten Russia anyway. Just like they have done with Assad in Syria, ALL the evidence has come from the terrorists and people like the White Helmets and SOHR, even the UN has NO independent sources that support any of the claims against Assad. When the evidence comes out from independent investigation that shows the stories to be true , then I for one say he should be tried and if found guilty, executed but we are a long, long way away from that.

Now another view, which of course the MSM you rely so much on has not even mentioned! Bottom line is this guy is mixed up in the infamous Steele dossier for MI6 and the CIA and the Clinton campaign drummed up against your hero Trump!

Another case of the UK (Coalition) singing to the US hymn sheet? The Russian collusion enquiry has just died and nobody noticed because it all turned out to be bullshit ...... that has cost the US taxpayer millions. Lavrof has just said that Russia has asked the UK for details of the accusations made against them and their evidence to suggest that the Russian Government was in any way involved ...... and they have received no reply.

Now a few facts you will never find out from your sources ......... :roll:

Theresa May's "45 Minutes" Moment

Today the British government made some dubious assertions about ....... the poisoning of its double agent Sergej Skripal.

Full text by Moon of Alabama ............

http://www.moonofalabama.org/2018/03/theresa-mays-45-minutes-claim.html#more
Robin Hood
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3258
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: Limassol

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby Paphitis » Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:33 am

B25 wrote:No, they just used Napalm. Perhaps this is more acceptable to you??


Speaking of Chemical Weapons, Russia has just attacked the UK with a Chemical Agent. there are 19 people critically ill as a result of their exposure to this agent.

The Russian that has developed this nerve agent is not actually living and working for the Americans.

This is the danger every nation faces now. Piss the Russians off under Pootin, and you will get it.

Ministers on the national security council were told that the nerve agent used was from a family of substances known as Novichok. “Based on the positive identification of this chemical agent by world-leading experts at Porton Down, our knowledge that Russia has previously produced this agent and would still be capable of doing so, Russia’s record of conducting state-sponsored assassinations, and our assessment that Russia views some defectors as legitimate targets for assassinations, the government has concluded that it is highly likely that Russia was responsible for the act against Sergei and Yulia Skripal,” she said.


Pootin is on a rampage. The warning signs are there. The world is going to pay a big price.

These nerve agents whilst belonging to a particular family, actually have their own finger print. And Russia just got finger printed. This attack was State Sponsored and there is only one possibility. This is actually an act of war.

And all this a week before their "elections". So now, he can say that the West is out to get him and Russia, so he is portraying that its Russia against the world.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23016
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby B25 » Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:18 pm

You have no evidence other than the 'probability' that it was the Russians. The west spreads falsehoods about whomever they want to trash. Unfortunately some swallow it, mentioning no names. I am not anti-west, but i have seen first hand how they have dealt with Cyprus and understand enough to know how they operate their black ops.

Next it'll be Russia's fault when the Martians arrive!!!!

I thin you need to sort out your own back yard before preaching to others. Almost every war since WWII was started or has US involvement, how is that Russia's fault.
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6245
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby Paphitis » Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:20 pm

B25 wrote:You have no evidence other than the 'probability' that it was the Russians. The west spreads falsehoods about whomever they want to trash. Unfortunately some swallow it, mentioning no names. I am not anti-west, but i have seen first hand how they have dealt with Cyprus and understand enough to know how they operate their black ops.

Next it'll be Russia's fault when the Martians arrive!!!!

I thin you need to sort out your own back yard before preaching to others. Almost every war since WWII was started or has US involvement, how is that Russia's fault.


The Scientist who invented the nerve Agent is now working for the Americans. This nerve agent is specific to Russia only. We would be quite happy to blame so many others but it's Russia whether you like it or not. The funny thing is, that this has taken Russia back some 20 years. Relations between Russia and the rest of the world are worse than what they ever were with the Soviet Union. Despite the Cold War with the Soviet Union, they as far as I know never did such a thing.

But whatever floats your boat. It was the oompa loompas. We are sick of playing all these games.

Unfortunately for Russia, its diplomats are about to get the big Asiktir from Britain.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23016
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Are views expressed by Paphitis reasonable

Postby miltiades » Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:39 pm

Did Russia....attack the UK ???
How, did the Russians really launch an attack on the UK ? I know, they just bombed the Houses of ...Parliament !!!
What utter bolloucks
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16982
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem Solution Proposals

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests