The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Cornelius Desmond O'Dwyer's Press Release

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Postby Gasman » Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:07 am

Cypriots do not like such effrontery and abuse (neither do I) and Conor WAS reminded that he was "Not in England now" during one stage of his ignorant exchanges.


:lol:

You obviously just post on this CYPRIOT forum then - and never READ any of it lol!

That was mild abuse by the standards set here.
Gasman
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3561
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 6:18 pm

Postby Gasman » Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:23 am

Quick glance back to the beginning of my thread here:

Oracle
There is ample evidence here, for the prosecution, of how unscrupulous and extortionist his aims are, IMHO. Shouldn't this fucker end up in the slammer, if there is any justice?


Ooops! :lol:

Where's GR's egg on face piccie!
Gasman
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3561
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 6:18 pm

Postby Schnauzer » Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:37 am

Gasman wrote:
Cypriots do not like such effrontery and abuse (neither do I) and Conor WAS reminded that he was "Not in England now" during one stage of his ignorant exchanges.


:lol:

You obviously just post on this CYPRIOT forum then - and never READ any of it lol!

That was mild abuse by the standards set here.


Actually I was referring rather more to the general attitudes of Cypriots in relation to their families (and traditions) than to the banter which takes place on this forum.

I doubt if ANY member here (or elsewhere) would relish the thought of their Father being described in such an appalling manner, furthermore, I doubt if any member here would relish the prospect of delivering such a message to the Son requiring that it should be passed on to the Father............unless of course that person was using a telephone thousands of miles away from the Son, seated in his place of business. :wink:
User avatar
Schnauzer
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2155
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:55 pm
Location: Touring Timbuktu.

Postby Jack M » Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:43 am

We can but hope that this father and son double act of crime end up in the cells too then they can deliver all sorts of messages to each other.
Jack M
Member
Member
 
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:55 am

Postby Schnauzer » Thu Oct 28, 2010 11:55 am

Jack M wrote:We can but hope that this father and son double act of crime end up in the cells too then they can deliver all sorts of messages to each other.


As long as they refrain from using obscene language and (if they do not) at least have the good sense not to advertise it on 'You Tube', they may deliver whatever messages they wish. :lol: :wink:
User avatar
Schnauzer
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2155
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:55 pm
Location: Touring Timbuktu.

Postby annaka » Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:26 pm

After all this, who is now the actual registered purchaser on the Land Registry records as I thought once your name or names are registered, that's the actual accepted future owner. If they can change their records at the drop of a hat, who would bother buying something that is not worth the paper it is written on and can be revoked without your consent, as happened in this instance.
annaka
Member
Member
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 2:53 pm

Postby Milo » Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:32 pm

Schnauzer wrote:
Jack M wrote:We can but hope that this father and son double act of crime end up in the cells too then they can deliver all sorts of messages to each other.


As long as they refrain from using obscene language and (if they do not) at least have the good sense not to advertise it on 'You Tube', they may deliver whatever messages they wish. :lol: :wink:


Well they will have a long time one hopes to think about why any one would dare call them obscene names, especially to ones father (if anyone did) in possible retaliation (if it happened of course) for death threats on wives and children in the UK, sort of makes sense to say that to someone does,nt it?? IF any of these men fathers sons brothers cousins had stolen my money threatened my family and attacked me with three men, calling someone names is a very lightweight retort imo, that would have been the easiest of my responses. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Best news I ,ve heard for sometime. Hope they rot.
User avatar
Milo
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 529
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 8:38 am

Postby Milo » Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:34 pm

annaka wrote:After all this, who is now the actual registered purchaser on the Land Registry records as I thought once your name or names are registered, that's the actual accepted future owner. If they can change their records at the drop of a hat, who would bother buying something that is not worth the paper it is written on and can be revoked without your consent, as happened in this instance.


As of today Conor O'Dwyer,s name is STILL on the contract as the purchaser at the local Land Registry. So therefore some more heads will have to roll :roll:
User avatar
Milo
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 529
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 8:38 am

Postby Schnauzer » Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:18 pm

Milo wrote:
Schnauzer wrote:
Jack M wrote:We can but hope that this father and son double act of crime end up in the cells too then they can deliver all sorts of messages to each other.


As long as they refrain from using obscene language and (if they do not) at least have the good sense not to advertise it on 'You Tube', they may deliver whatever messages they wish. :lol: :wink:


Well they will have a long time one hopes to think about why any one would dare call them obscene names, especially to ones father (if anyone did) in possible retaliation (if it happened of course) for death threats on wives and children in the UK, sort of makes sense to say that to someone does,nt it?? IF any of these men fathers sons brothers cousins had stolen my money threatened my family and attacked me with three men, calling someone names is a very lightweight retort imo, that would have been the easiest of my responses. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Best news I ,ve heard for sometime. Hope they rot.



I think you are initially trying to imply that Conor did not utter his foul comments (which is a mistake since they are proven fact and the evidence is quite clear) and that secondly, you are attempting to introduce scenarios which did not take place (which is also a mistake since there is no evidence to substantiate them).

If your intention (along with others) is to re-invigorate a lost cause by either attracting sympathy from an audience or creating an entourage of similar deadbeats prepared to follow Conor, may I suggest that you have chosen the wrong forum to attempt such objectives.

Conor thought he was a smart operator, he was not, the only thing smart about him was that he was smart enough to ensure that his personal insult was delivered by telephone.

Had he uttered his foul comment face to face with the Son, he would have had little time left to 'Pitch his tent'. (IMHO) :roll: :wink:
User avatar
Schnauzer
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2155
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 10:55 pm
Location: Touring Timbuktu.

Postby Gasman » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:35 pm

'Banter' on this forum?

Accusing members of sleeping with their own daughters. Calling members wives, sisters and daughters prostitutes. I lost count of the insults slung at people's mothers on here - some of them very nasty.

Calling other members paedophiles, and homosexuals (in every slang fashion you can think of).

Banter?

Is it only 'insulting' if the insult is directed at a MALE member of a Cypriot's family then? I have noticed they tend to stick to insulting the women.
Gasman
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3561
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 6:18 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests