Daniella,
You never said a truer word!
The fact that 16 plonkers of this forum think that the 9/11 disaster was deliberately self afflicted does say a lot about our society which feeds and breaths on conspiracy theories that overshadow and anull are stupid mistakes.
The only plonkers on this thread are those that come out with such stupid uneducated comments!
Take just one incident on 9-11, that being the impact on the Pentagon by a standard commercial airliner being flown by a pilot with no experience on type and so poor a private pilot that he was refused rental on a Cessna 172 because of his incompetence. If you believe the official story then lets look at a few relevant facts, no conspiracy just a few ‘mistakes’ which seem to conflict with the story given at the time:
• From the flight data recorder, the aircraft was flying at a speed 110Knts above Vne (Velocity never exceed) speed, that is over 600MPH.
• Prior to impact it did an almost 270 degree turn, at this Vne+ speed to impact the ground floor offices in an area of the Pentagon into which an accounts team had just been relocated to investigate a missing trillion dollars from the Pentagon budget. Rumsfeld made this announcement about the missing money the night before 9-11 on National TV.
• Had the aircraft stayed on its original heading, instead of making a spectacular 270 deg. turn it would have impacted the area of the Pentagon that housed all the top brass, including Rumsfeld.
• At the point of impact it was flying approx 3m above ground level, having ‘jumped’ a hump in the highway it passed over and a also jumped a gantry of in its path. It also managed this feat without so much as damaging a blade of grass on the Pentagon lawns
• Upon impact the aircrafts composite fibre nose punched a hole in the outer wall that was significantly smaller than the diameter of the fuselage. The nose cone then appears to have penetrated the building, travelled through several interior reinforced concrete walls, with a combined thickness of around 9m and exited through a hole about 2m in diameter in an inner courtyard, where upon it appears to have vapourised.
• At the point of impact the windows above the impact point were unbroken, this is where the tail and vertical stabiliser would have impacted. There is no indication at all of the impact point of the wings, nor the two engines, which are the two densest single items on the aircraft.
• There was no visible debris in front of or around the entry point, commensurate with other air crash sites. The only photographs produced were a photo of what turned out to be the compressor of an auxiliary power unit and the undercarriage also seems to have remarkably disappeared.
• The columns inside the building were still visible through the entry hole at this time and still intact. After the collapse there is a video showing a telephone directory, standing on a stool at the edge of the demolished area, with its pages flapping in the wind, inspite of the ignition of several thousand litres of Jet A1 fuel.
• Within 30 minutes of the event, Pentagon security were starting to clear the area of debris (evidence) and security also went around the local area confiscating CCTV tapes. Of these 100 odd tapes the only bits released have been five frames from one camera that did not even show an aircraft, just a fire ball.
Experienced airline pilots with tens of thousands of hours on type have said they would find it impossible to manoeuvre such an aircraft at those speeds and make turns that could only be accomplished in a fighter aircraft such as an F16/F18 in the hands of an experienced graduate of the Top Gun school of military aviation.
An aircraft could not fly that low, at that speed because of the ground effect. This is the effect that allows an aircraft to float just before the wheels hit the tarmac. Even after touch down the lift provided by the wings has to be physically broken by spoilers to prevent the aircraft bumping back into the air.
Surely, even the most sceptical person has to ask for some clarrification to explain why the facts appear to refute the story issued as the ‘official’ statement by the US Administration.
So, I think there is a lot that happened on that day that is rather less cut-and-dried than the US Administration would have the people believe and this is only the incident at the Pentagon. There are similar anomalies with ALL the other events.
Something does not seem right?
