The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


What happened to flight MH370?

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Re: What happened to flight MH370?

Postby Paphitis » Thu Apr 10, 2014 11:11 am

Pyrpolizer wrote:Ha,ha ha. How I knew you would draw such a fallacious conclusion!! Because you did draw exactly the same fallacious conclusion once before babe! It is YOUR comprehension skills that luck not mine. And not only in English but in ANY other language. To comprehend you need logic and most languages do provide enough tools for that. Let aside that there are languages like Turkish that you need imagination as well.
What can I tell you? If you are totally incapable of understanding the subtle difference between a man made device and a Black box, your place is in the dustbin.


Are you telling me you have logic?

Pyro, I have contributed dozens of Aviation Related posts which I am led to believe are held in very high regard by some members. I do that to help people with no aviation background to understand and learn some things. I don't have to do it and no one forces me to do it, but i do it because it is interesting and I enjoy the discussion and I like to see people take an interest in a subject that is dear to me.

I have spent a whole lifetime in this industry and by now I am considered "old hands" but I feel that I have excellent material to offer the board and have done so in the past if you want to go and look back at all the information I have posted here which I would not have done if it were not for the keen interest of Kikapu and a few others.

It is very difficult to use logic and be analytical when individuals like yourself come up with all sorts of stupid stuff.

Pyrpolizer wrote:Look at the pompous child once again. Who cares from what device you are writing? Who are you trying to impress? How many times are you going to tell us you are writing from your Apple whatever? If you think this is a stupid forum then go away, we don’t need you here. Go read your official announcements and leave us alone to think in peace. Your contribution so far has been nothing than disturbance.


I don't need to impress anyone and if I wanted to I could be careful but I do not spend the time to achieve attention to detail because I don't want to. I do use Apple and I don't see what the issue with this is. Apple have a feature called "predictive text" and sometimes it changes entire words completely and I always fall for it on many occasions.

You are obviously being very childish. You are free to go away if you want. I will continue to post in this thread for as long as I like, and forgive me for being pompous, but I do feel I have a lot more logic and intelligent analysis as well as knowledge to offer than you do!
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: What happened to flight MH370?

Postby Pyrpolizer » Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:03 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:Ha,ha ha. How I knew you would draw such a fallacious conclusion!! Because you did draw exactly the same fallacious conclusion once before babe! It is YOUR comprehension skills that luck not mine. And not only in English but in ANY other language. To comprehend you need logic and most languages do provide enough tools for that. Let aside that there are languages like Turkish that you need imagination as well.
What can I tell you? If you are totally incapable of understanding the subtle difference between a man made device and a Black box, your place is in the dustbin.


Are you telling me you have logic?

Pyro, I have contributed dozens of Aviation Related posts which I am led to believe are held in very high regard by some members. I do that to help people with no aviation background to understand and learn some things. I don't have to do it and no one forces me to do it, but i do it because it is interesting and I enjoy the discussion and I like to see people take an interest in a subject that is dear to me.

I have spent a whole lifetime in this industry and by now I am considered "old hands" but I feel that I have excellent material to offer the board and have done so in the past if you want to go and look back at all the information I have posted here which I would not have done if it were not for the keen interest of Kikapu and a few others.

It is very difficult to use logic and be analytical when individuals like yourself come up with all sorts of stupid stuff.

Pyrpolizer wrote:Look at the pompous child once again. Who cares from what device you are writing? Who are you trying to impress? How many times are you going to tell us you are writing from your Apple whatever? If you think this is a stupid forum then go away, we don’t need you here. Go read your official announcements and leave us alone to think in peace. Your contribution so far has been nothing than disturbance.


I don't need to impress anyone and if I wanted to I could be careful but I do not spend the time to achieve attention to detail because I don't want to. I do use Apple and I don't see what the issue with this is. Apple have a feature called "predictive text" and sometimes it changes entire words completely and I always fall for it on many occasions.

You are obviously being very childish. You are free to go away if you want. I will continue to post in this thread for as long as I like, and forgive me for being pompous, but I do feel I have a lot more logic and intelligent analysis as well as knowledge to offer than you do!


You are ignored! I will not even waste my time reading it.
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12892
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: What happened to flight MH370?

Postby Paphitis » Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:32 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:Ha,ha ha. How I knew you would draw such a fallacious conclusion!! Because you did draw exactly the same fallacious conclusion once before babe! It is YOUR comprehension skills that luck not mine. And not only in English but in ANY other language. To comprehend you need logic and most languages do provide enough tools for that. Let aside that there are languages like Turkish that you need imagination as well.
What can I tell you? If you are totally incapable of understanding the subtle difference between a man made device and a Black box, your place is in the dustbin.


Are you telling me you have logic?

Pyro, I have contributed dozens of Aviation Related posts which I am led to believe are held in very high regard by some members. I do that to help people with no aviation background to understand and learn some things. I don't have to do it and no one forces me to do it, but i do it because it is interesting and I enjoy the discussion and I like to see people take an interest in a subject that is dear to me.

I have spent a whole lifetime in this industry and by now I am considered "old hands" but I feel that I have excellent material to offer the board and have done so in the past if you want to go and look back at all the information I have posted here which I would not have done if it were not for the keen interest of Kikapu and a few others.

It is very difficult to use logic and be analytical when individuals like yourself come up with all sorts of stupid stuff.

Pyrpolizer wrote:Look at the pompous child once again. Who cares from what device you are writing? Who are you trying to impress? How many times are you going to tell us you are writing from your Apple whatever? If you think this is a stupid forum then go away, we don’t need you here. Go read your official announcements and leave us alone to think in peace. Your contribution so far has been nothing than disturbance.


I don't need to impress anyone and if I wanted to I could be careful but I do not spend the time to achieve attention to detail because I don't want to. I do use Apple and I don't see what the issue with this is. Apple have a feature called "predictive text" and sometimes it changes entire words completely and I always fall for it on many occasions.

You are obviously being very childish. You are free to go away if you want. I will continue to post in this thread for as long as I like, and forgive me for being pompous, but I do feel I have a lot more logic and intelligent analysis as well as knowledge to offer than you do!


You are ignored! I will not even waste my time reading it.


Of course not!

Do us a favour and ignore the thread. Or better still, open a conspiracy theory thread on MH370 so that some of the whackos can come and join you to discuss all the conspiracy theories you want which defy all logic.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: What happened to flight MH370?

Postby Pyrpolizer » Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:40 pm

Ahh, fresh again without too much distortion, back to our little Cypriot forum for some further information, meant for the few who could possibly understand it.

There has been a suspicion (at other forums) that the pings detected by the beacons might be fake because their pulse duration was way out of manufacturer’s specs.
In the end it was proven that without the original signal which by it’s very nature is not even audible to the human ear nobody can draw such conclusion.

a)the signal carries a huge amount of noise
b)The pings in most instances occur at times the noise is more than the signal itself.
c)The signal can only be analyzed using specialized software whose spectrogram and audible sounds (as published on video by the Australians) are nothing but an aid to the user of the software.
d)the frequency of the signal as announced is 32.3 Khz instead of the expected 37.5 Khz .This is a big difference by all accounts.
e)It might be impossible to confirm the pitch of the signal with all that distortion even by the analyzer of the original signal using special software. The pitch of the signal together with the frequency and the time intervals are the 3 parameters required to verify beyond any reasonable doubt that it comes from a black box.
f)The Doppler effect principle cannot be used because of the unknown effects of the media (which in this case is water) the background noise, and the huge frequency shift mentioned in "d"
g)one set of pings comes at intervals of 1.06 secs which leads to the conclusion they originate from a man made source
h)There is another set of pings that show up randomly, whose timing is totally irrelevant to the 1.06 multiples
i)The frequency of the audible sound that they published ranges from a few Hz to about 20Kz and that is strange.

Because of the above it is possible the pings are the result of harmonics from man made sources other than the MH370 Black boxes.
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12892
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: What happened to flight MH370?

Postby Pyrpolizer » Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:52 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:Ha,ha ha. How I knew you would draw such a fallacious conclusion!! Because you did draw exactly the same fallacious conclusion once before babe! It is YOUR comprehension skills that luck not mine. And not only in English but in ANY other language. To comprehend you need logic and most languages do provide enough tools for that. Let aside that there are languages like Turkish that you need imagination as well.
What can I tell you? If you are totally incapable of understanding the subtle difference between a man made device and a Black box, your place is in the dustbin.


Are you telling me you have logic?

Pyro, I have contributed dozens of Aviation Related posts which I am led to believe are held in very high regard by some members. I do that to help people with no aviation background to understand and learn some things. I don't have to do it and no one forces me to do it, but i do it because it is interesting and I enjoy the discussion and I like to see people take an interest in a subject that is dear to me.

I have spent a whole lifetime in this industry and by now I am considered "old hands" but I feel that I have excellent material to offer the board and have done so in the past if you want to go and look back at all the information I have posted here which I would not have done if it were not for the keen interest of Kikapu and a few others.

It is very difficult to use logic and be analytical when individuals like yourself come up with all sorts of stupid stuff.

Pyrpolizer wrote:Look at the pompous child once again. Who cares from what device you are writing? Who are you trying to impress? How many times are you going to tell us you are writing from your Apple whatever? If you think this is a stupid forum then go away, we don’t need you here. Go read your official announcements and leave us alone to think in peace. Your contribution so far has been nothing than disturbance.


I don't need to impress anyone and if I wanted to I could be careful but I do not spend the time to achieve attention to detail because I don't want to. I do use Apple and I don't see what the issue with this is. Apple have a feature called "predictive text" and sometimes it changes entire words completely and I always fall for it on many occasions.

You are obviously being very childish. You are free to go away if you want. I will continue to post in this thread for as long as I like, and forgive me for being pompous, but I do feel I have a lot more logic and intelligent analysis as well as knowledge to offer than you do!


You are ignored! I will not even waste my time reading it.


Of course not!

Do us a favour and ignore the thread. Or better still, open a conspiracy theory thread on MH370 so that some of the whackos can come and join you to discuss all the conspiracy theories you want which defy all logic.


You are ignored :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12892
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: What happened to flight MH370?

Postby GreekIslandGirl » Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:52 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:Ahh, fresh again without too much distortion, back to our little Cypriot forum for some further information, meant for the few who could possibly understand it.

There has been a suspicion (at other forums) that the pings detected by the beacons might be fake because their pulse duration was way out of manufacturer’s specs.
In the end it was proven that without the original signal which by it’s very nature is not even audible to the human ear nobody can draw such conclusion.

a)the signal carries a huge amount of noise
b)The pings in most instances occur at times the noise is more than the signal itself.
c)The signal can only be analyzed using specialized software whose spectrogram and audible sounds (as published on video by the Australians) are nothing but an aid to the user of the software.
d)the frequency of the signal as announced is 32.3 Khz instead of the expected 37.5 Khz .This is a big difference by all accounts.
e)It might be impossible to confirm the pitch of the signal with all that distortion even by the analyzer of the original signal using special software. The pitch of the signal together with the frequency and the time intervals are the 3 parameters required to verify beyond any reasonable doubt that it comes from a black box.
f)The Doppler effect principle cannot be used because of the unknown effects of the media (which in this case is water) the background noise, and the huge frequency shift mentioned in "d"
g)one set of pings comes at intervals of 1.06 secs which leads to the conclusion they originate from a man made source
h)There is another set of pings that show up randomly, whose timing is totally irrelevant to the 1.06 multiples
i)The frequency of the audible sound that they published ranges from a few Hz to about 20Kz and that is strange.

Because of the above it is possible the pings are the result of harmonics from man made sources other than the MH370 Black boxes.


Nice and clear. Thanks. :)

(For all it's worth, I'm pleased this forum is about exerting challenges, rather than regurgitating officialdom and seeking accolade. I like how you back your opinions with scientific evidence rather than appeals to "trust". )
User avatar
GreekIslandGirl
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9083
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:03 am

Re: What happened to flight MH370?

Postby Kikapu » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:20 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Kikapu wrote:Yes, you can also add South Korea and Japan onto the "TEAM". They are after all under American protection against any Chinese, North Korean and Russian military threats.


There is a fundamental flaw in your thinking. Literally, thousands of people will be privy or have knowledge of rogue Subs in the search area because the Guided Missile Frigates, Orions and Poseidons would have detected them. Loose lips sink ships and it is only a matter of time before the cat is let out of the bag either deliberately or inadvertently. Things like this are "need to know" but the US will not be able to keep the secret too easily. You simply can't stop flight crews from doing what they are trained to do.


I'm not talking about any rouge subs in the area that may be sending false ping signals. I'm talking about a subs from the "TEAM".

Paphitis wrote:
Kikapu wrote:Why would anyone care if there were one or two submarines around to look for the missing MH370? Are they forbidden to be used? It could be a sub from any one of the "TEAM".


They would have to inform the Flight Crews because they would always be deploying Sonar and the MAD which will detect any Sub. It is a game of cat and mouse and the crews get a massive morale boost when they detect any Sub whether on the same team or not. As I said, too many people in the know, and that makes things extremely difficult. Now that's just the Flight Crews. What about all the Navy Ships such as HMAS Toowoomba which is an accomplished Anti Submarine Warfare Ship and Guided Missile Frigate? I do not believe the Chinese are that incompetent that they would not detect the Submarine either.

No Submarines are not forbidden. There is a British Sub in the area helping with the search.


But the subs who may be sending false ping signals are not hiding to play a "cat & mouse" games. They are in fact with the "TEAM". The Chinese can only know there are subs in the area. But do they know they might have sent false ping signals?

Paphitis wrote:
Kikapu wrote:The plane shoot down is Pyro's theory and not mine, therefore I'm asking questions on behalf of my friend Pyro. Since there are many gaps in this whole MH370 affaire, unless the search starts making sense which thus far has not been on the up & up, then it will only add suspicion in how the search is being conducted and by whom. Since the location of the missing MH370 has been placed in Australians neighbourhood, then they will be doing what ever the "TEAM" needs to do, no questions asked.


There are no gaps or there is nothing the authorities are withholding from the public unless it jeopardizes the Criminal Investigation or which may cause distress to the families. There is absolutely no incentive for the US or Australia to cover anything up even if the aircraft was knocked out of the sky which you could hardly be critical of if it flew anywhere near Diego Garcia. I still do not believe the Americans would shoot it down without a clear and imminent threat.

It is very clear that the Australian Government and Authorities are taking their obligations very seriously and there is a lot at stake. The airline industry can't afford for this matter to remain unresolved.


There have been many gaps created in the last month regarding MH370, which there has been one misleading crash site discoveries after another, and it is still going on with these ping signals. Surely if the ping signals were coming from a stationary location of the Black Boxes, it's almost whereabouts would have been established by now and the next step would be to send submersibles to try and retrieve it, despite not having had a confirmed and proven crash site.

Paphitis wrote:
Kikapu wrote:Why were these ping signal detectors were ONLY deployed in the last few days or so just as the expected battery life's of the Black Boxes would end just by miracle, they got a "HIT" right away when there were not a shred of evidence of any floating debris from MH370 in the area? First by the Chinese and then by the Australians some 300+ miles away. Now the signals are almost ending because the batteries on the Black Boxes are dead, but still not being able to pinpoint the Black Boxes by triangulation even after 4 separate "HITS". So now we have been left with a huge "haystack".


Because the authorities had absolutely no idea where to look. The idea was to detect debris, find the haystack and then look for the needle.

If you notice, all the pings were exactly right on the Inmarsat Southern Arc or only a few miles from it. The Search Effort concentrated its effort around this arc because that was the only scientific lead they had. So no it was not by pure chance or coincidental.

It is extremely difficult because the Ships have to tow the detector very slowly and listen for any changes in frequency and intensity and they have to that from different bearings and sometimes they lose the signal and find it difficult to regain it. Not at all a simple process but they do have a haystack now and the Submersible will be deployed in 2 or 3 days.


But if the possible crash site is on the Southern Arch based on Inmarsat, that finding was made about 3 weeks ago, so why weren't the ping signal detectors not deployed 3 weeks ago when the batteries in the Black Boxes were full and their signals very strong and not wait until the batteries are near dead. Do you see where I'm going with this my friend?

Paphitis wrote:
Kikapu wrote:As I have said before, if the plane has been shot down, some debris will be recovered eventually because it will be placed at the "crash site" by those who shot it down but the Black Boxes will never be recovered, at least not the original recordings from flight MH370. It will drag for a long time and yes money will be spent to cover any possible shoot down, but it will be a small change in comparison to the political and financial damage it would cause if it were to be learnt that the MH370 was shot down. In the end, it cost Libya few Billions of Dollars in direct payment for the Lockerbie PanAm 103 bombing victims.


Which is absolute proof that MH370 was NOT shot down. They have not even found any debris at the crash site either.

There would be no financial loss or damage to the US if they did shoot the aircraft down. The relatives would not be eligible for compensation from the US either but MAS might be liable. However, in the end, even if the US had to compensate each family next of kin by 2 million USD each then that is a mere 500 million USD. Let me tell you that this is Chicken Feed and the US Government would probably have no issue paying up but they would not admit liability or wrong doing because the fact is, they and any other country is allowed to shoot down any aircraft if it poses any threat. Even if the compensation is Billions, it is still Chicken Feed. The Search Effort has already hit $200 million after just one month.


Well, the plane was not shot down at the Southern Indian Ocean where the search is going on now. If it were shot down, it would have been at a different location further north by about a thousand miles. Any debris found in the Southern Indian Ocean if the plane was shot down much further north, then the debris would be planted there.

It is never good when a passenger jet is shot down by any military for any reason, even if warranted. It is as close as you can come to being murdering innocent people, just as it was when the Russians shot down South Korean passenger jet KAL 007 or the Americans shooting down Iranian passenger jet flight IR 655. Aside from financial cost, it has much larger problems with political costs, especially when most were Chinese citizens on MH370. Btw, Pyro reported it has only cost about $20 million plus in total so far, which is about a month. Mostly going to jet fuel and fuel for the ships I guess. The personal are all military, therefore, those costs are covered.


Paphitis wrote:
Kikapu wrote:You say that if the US did shoot down MH370 they would admit to it. I don't think so my friend. Even if they had all the justification for shooting it down, they would not admit to it unless they had to and not before. Lets take the case of United Flight 93 on 9/11 that supposedly crashed in Pennsylvania after the passengers stormed the cockpit to take the plane back from the terrorists after one of them said "Lets Roll". Really, is that what really happened? I mean, it sounds all heroic, glorious and romantic that would make any citizen of any country very proud of these daring passengers who have scarified their lives to save others, but in reality, it all points to Flight UA9 being shot down by the US air force. Would anyone blame the US government for shooting down UA93 under the circumstances of 9/11? No, no one would, including me and I'm sure Pyro also, but has the US government admitted shooting down the plane? No they have not. Just a little food for thought my friend. As knowledgeable as you are when it comes to Aviation which I for one love reading, you put too much trust in your government and accept their explanations as being fact. I don't, and if we do not question our governments in what they tell us, then the truth will never come out. At least by questioning our governments, we have some hope of getting to the bottom of things, even if it takes 50 years to do so.


Yes but you forget that the US FAA actually retrieved the Black Box of UA93 and that my friend can't be fabricated. Everything is recorded meticulously.

I don't know what the issue is with passengers trying to storm the cockpit. I don't think it is heroic at all, but the media will portray it as such. If I was on that plane, then I might have been the one that said "Let's Roll" and man I would have given it all I got. It's called survival instinct. I think you and anyone else would do the same.


Actually, as far as I'm aware, the findings from the Black Boxes from flight UA93 were never released to the public, but were ONLY given to the relatives of the victims on that flight. Who knows what the US government fed them for information. We did not even see any wreckage of flight UA93 but only a creator in the ground as if the ground swallowed the whole plane. Really?

As for the "Lets Roll" comment, it is all to do with diverting people’s attention from shooting down the jet, that's all..
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 17985
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Re: What happened to flight MH370?

Postby Pyrpolizer » Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:54 pm

GreekIslandGirl wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:Ahh, fresh again without too much distortion, back to our little Cypriot forum for some further information, meant for the few who could possibly understand it.

There has been a suspicion (at other forums) that the pings detected by the beacons might be fake because their pulse duration was way out of manufacturer’s specs.
In the end it was proven that without the original signal which by it’s very nature is not even audible to the human ear nobody can draw such conclusion.

a)the signal carries a huge amount of noise
b)The pings in most instances occur at times the noise is more than the signal itself.
c)The signal can only be analyzed using specialized software whose spectrogram and audible sounds (as published on video by the Australians) are nothing but an aid to the user of the software.
d)the frequency of the signal as announced is 32.3 Khz instead of the expected 37.5 Khz .This is a big difference by all accounts.
e)It might be impossible to confirm the pitch of the signal with all that distortion even by the analyzer of the original signal using special software. The pitch of the signal together with the frequency and the time intervals are the 3 parameters required to verify beyond any reasonable doubt that it comes from a black box.
f)The Doppler effect principle cannot be used because of the unknown effects of the media (which in this case is water) the background noise, and the huge frequency shift mentioned in "d"
g)one set of pings comes at intervals of 1.06 secs which leads to the conclusion they originate from a man made source
h)There is another set of pings that show up randomly, whose timing is totally irrelevant to the 1.06 multiples
i)The frequency of the audible sound that they published ranges from a few Hz to about 20Kz and that is strange.

Because of the above it is possible the pings are the result of harmonics from man made sources other than the MH370 Black boxes.


Nice and clear. Thanks. :)

(For all it's worth, I'm pleased this forum is about exerting challenges, rather than regurgitating officialdom and seeking accolade. I like how you back your opinions with scientific evidence rather than appeals to "trust". )


Thank you GIG. It's encouraging to know that at least some people are thinking.
Here's a copy of the images i posted elsewhere regarding my points a,b,c,i and j

Image

Image


I 'll try find the example regarding the pitch duration of the signal and post it too.
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12892
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: What happened to flight MH370?

Postby Pyrpolizer » Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:06 pm

@GIG.
Ok here’s how the signal should be heard when modified to become audible to the human ear. Sharp and irritating. The pitch is 10ms exact as per manufacturer’s specs. The audible pitch duration of the signal that the Australians published is at least 20 times as much, but this doesn’t mean anything given the huge amount of noise it contains.

http://www.2shared.com/audio/kM65_ti_/full.html

NB.To download the file press the small "download" button not the big one.
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12892
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: What happened to flight MH370?

Postby GreekIslandGirl » Thu Apr 10, 2014 3:14 pm

I don't have time to follow this story, other than be alerted by the odd news-feed, so thanks for (between you and Kikapu) keeping it real.

From your images: I find it hard to believe anyone has the audacity to conclude picking up signals, and assigning them to a black box, given the poor quality of information detectable. This inference is worse than the information tabloid newspapers throw out every so often that "scientists have discovered the cure to cancer". And then we find out it's just another technician massaging iffy data that belongs in the bin.

The signal images you posted are a sad reflection of whoever is 'in charge' of this search. Where are their controls? I'm sure they get increased noise blips corresponding to what they suggest is "signal" all the time! They are just randomly making conclusions hoping that, by chance, they will come across something - anything!

Have they given up on floating objects? Of course. Soon they will give up on "signals".

After all this time, there are no two bits of information that tally with each other.

Again, I remain mystified as to why our 'world leaders' of space-exploration and earthly-monitoring remain so quiet on the matter (like someone with something to hide).
User avatar
GreekIslandGirl
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9083
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:03 am

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests