Cyprus-Forum.com

[erolz66]

[supporttheunderdog]

Indeed. What I was going to say about the total intellectual dishonesty on the part of "G"IG and her loss of credibility with her last post has been made redundant by this...

[GreekIslandGirl]

claim that the EU Commission press release was in fact just a 'discussion site'

Erm ..... perhaps because:

European Commission - Press release
Commission discusses draft Schengen Evaluation Report on Greece

Brussels, 27 January 2016

Commission discusses draft Schengen Evaluation Report on Greece

The College of Commissioners has today, in view of the findings and their significance, taken note and discussed a draft Schengen Evaluation Report on Greece.

Looks like he's realised his mistake. It's there in black and white!

[erolz66]

[GreekIslandGirl]

Yes, silly aren't you.

If it mentions 'discusses/discussed' three time in the opening sentences, any normal person would call it a discussion. But not our resident distortionist, Erolz . Nope. He cannot tolerate facts.

[erolz66]

cyprus43551-20.html#p834805

[GreekIslandGirl]

cyprus43551-20.html#p834805

Limiting your propaganda time to reposting emoticons doesn't seem to have made much difference to your overall record of posting sheer unsubstantiated rubbish. Is there a particular bit of nonsense of yours you want to point out or are all of your outpourings now self-declared as ridiculous?

[Lordo]

you ain got a clue as to what is posted anyway what you worried about.

[erolz66]

cyprus43551-20.html?hilit=debate%20sites%20NOT#p834805

[supporttheunderdog]

Yes, silly aren't you.

If it mentions 'discusses/discussed' three time in the opening sentences, any normal person would call it a discussion. But not our resident distortionist, Erolz . Nope. He cannot tolerate facts.

i

Here is a screen shot of the press release

image.png

How any one except gig could take a document clearly marked as a press release and assert it is a discussion document, as opposed to a report of discussions is beyond belief. IMHO That Is however her trade mark, to selectively quote, sometimes misquote, and then wilfully miscontrue. Here her selective identification of the word "discuss" and her distortion of the context in which has been used is IMHO low even by her standards of chronic selective misquoting and misrepresenting. And it has taken her a fair few days to come up with this, suggesting to me at least that she has constructed this argument after the event to justify her position.
I think it proves beyond any reasonable doubt her intellectual dishonesty.

I honestly do not think gig can have much if any credibility left here. Shall I do a poll on that?