Cyprus-Forum.com

[erolz66]

CG, If you think people from other countries who would meet the 70 point threshold are going to come to the UK just to flip hamburgers, you are dreaming, not unless they were paid much more money than they were earning back home at around £25,000. If not, who is going to do these low paying jobs? Just answer the question please.

Binary...

Re-read my last post slowly and try to understand it if you can...

cyprus47174-10.html?hilit=binary#p890876

cyprus47160-140.html?hilit=binary#p890656

cyprus47149-160.html?hilit=binary#p890264

cyprus47160.html?hilit=binary#p890252

cyprus47049-650.html?hilit=binary#p887892

cyprus47041-580.html?hilit=binary#p887140



The degree to which you appear to be a total hypocrite is quite remarkable See what I did there ?

[cyprusgrump]

The degree to which you appear to be a total hypocrite is quite remarkable See what I did there ?

Not really, no...

You're a joke, change the record, you lost, nothing is as you claim...

The UK has moved on... You should too... And take Milti with you, you are both living in a fantasy past that never really existed...

[erolz66]

You (and the other Remoaners) have been trotting out the same old tired arguments for the past five years...

Immigration to the UK over the last 150 years to date has either been a net positive or net negative to the UK economically. Study after study after study has shown over and over again that overall immigrants are net contributors. Not only do you just ignore this wealth of detailed evidence, you ignore the 'common sense' of how did the US become so economically successful given it was built on 400 plus years of immigrantion to it and then just claim the opposite, that immigrants are an economic burden on the countries the migrate to, without providing a shred of evidence to support this other than your own ego. You have been doing this for way longer than 5 years.

You have been proven wrong over and over and over, what really is the point in engaging with you...?

Show an example ?

Look at Kiks last post - completely ignored my last points.

What does it remind me of...?

yourself ?

[erolz66]

You're a joke, change the record, you lost, nothing is as you claim...

it's almost like you have no counter argument to make so just resort to name calling

[Kikapu]

CG, If you think people from other countries who would meet the 70 point threshold are going to come to the UK just to flip hamburgers, you are dreaming, not unless they were paid much more money than they were earning back home at around £25,000. If not, who is going to do these low paying jobs? Just answer the question please.

Binary...

Re-read my last post slowly and try to understand it if you can...

Your last post basically states that importing low skilled workers is bad for the UK. Let’s say that you are correct, are you then going to import high skill workers meeting the entry level 70 point to do the low skill jobs for less money than they were earning in their own country? Is this your plan?

[cyprusgrump]

Immigration to the UK over the last 150 years to date has either been a net positive or net negative to the UK economically. Study after study after study has shown over and over again that overall immigrants are net contributors. Not only do you just ignore this wealth of detailed evidence, you ignore the 'common sense' of how did the US become so economically successful given it was built on 400 plus years of immigrantion to it and then just claim the opposite, that immigrants are an economic burden on the countries the migrate to, without providing a shred of evidence to support this other than your own ego. You have been doing this for way longer than 5 years.

Straw man...

Is that what we are really talking about...?

Tell me about the brain surgeons, computer scientists and other nett benefits that the UK has imported over the past say, 20 years...?

[cyprusgrump]

CG, If you think people from other countries who would meet the 70 point threshold are going to come to the UK just to flip hamburgers, you are dreaming, not unless they were paid much more money than they were earning back home at around £25,000. If not, who is going to do these low paying jobs? Just answer the question please.

Binary...

Re-read my last post slowly and try to understand it if you can...

Your last post basically states that importing low skilled workers is bad for the UK. Let’s say that you are correct, are you then going to import high skill workers meeting the entry level 70 point to do the low skill jobs for less money than they were earning in their own country? Is this your plan?

Read it once more... S l o w l y this time and see if you can comprehend the meaning of my post...

[erolz66]

Immigration to the UK over the last 150 years to date has either been a net positive or net negative to the UK economically. Study after study after study has shown over and over again that overall immigrants are net contributors. Not only do you just ignore this wealth of detailed evidence, you ignore the 'common sense' of how did the US become so economically successful given it was built on 400 plus years of immigrantion to it and then just claim the opposite, that immigrants are an economic burden on the countries the migrate to, without providing a shred of evidence to support this other than your own ego. You have been doing this for way longer than 5 years.

Straw man...

Is that what we are really talking about...?

Tell me about the brain surgeons, computer scientists and other nett benefits that the UK has imported over the past say, 20 years...?

I am still waiting for you to show ANY evidence for your claim that

"As I said earlier, importing low-skill workers and their families puts a burden on taxpayers and the health and education systems."

This was not true re my father. Re Priti Patel's family. Re Marks of M&S and 10s of thousands of other examples. I can show study after study that contradicts your claim. You have shown nothing to support your claim. You just behave as though it must be true because it is what you claim - ego personified

[erolz66]

One of the fascinating things about Remoaners, and those on the left generally is the binary thinking...

This lady seems pretty 'binary' about immigration to the UK



I guess by your logic she must be 'on the left'

[Kikapu]

CG, If you think people from other countries who would meet the 70 point threshold are going to come to the UK just to flip hamburgers, you are dreaming, not unless they were paid much more money than they were earning back home at around £25,000. If not, who is going to do these low paying jobs? Just answer the question please.

Binary...

Re-read my last post slowly and try to understand it if you can...

Your last post basically states that importing low skilled workers is bad for the UK. Let’s say that you are correct, are you then going to import high skill workers meeting the entry level 70 point to do the low skill jobs for less money than they were earning in their own country? Is this your plan?

Read it once more... S l o w l y this time and see if you can comprehend the meaning of my post...

I got it, you don’t want to answer the question, because you can’t.