Cyprus-Forum.com

[Kikapu]

Can you imagine impeaching a sitting President for “lying” about sex which is what the Republicans did, and here you have Trump admitting for grabbing women’s pussies as well as paying off call girls to keep quiet.

The GOP cunts went after Clinton on Whitewater, Paula Jones, Vince Foster’s suicide and on a on.

Always difficult - to get involved in what appears to be defending Don but I think you’re talking chalk ‘n’ cheese. Clinton had an ongoing and inappropriate sexual relationship with a 21 year old intern - whilst he was President. Including, on at least one occasion, getting a blow job in the Oval Room (which apparently didn’t count as sex to slick Willie the lawyer ). He subsequently got involved in witness tampering and lying to a grand jury. A bit different to Trump’s grubby history. Neither covered themselves in glory but both were minor league compared to JFK’s excesses.

Clinton was asked, “is there a relationship between himself and Monica Lewinsky” which he replied “no”, and at that time he did not. Since the question had a present tense to it, he did not lie by saying “no”, which is where we got from Clinton as to what is the definition of is is. Therefore, Clinton technically did not lie at the grand jury since his relationship with Monica was in the past.

I agree, it was a lame excuse by Clinton saying that Monica had sex with him, but, he did not with her.

He only left his DNA on her blue dress, that’s all.

I think he was asked if he had a “sexual relationship” with Monica which he replied with a no. If he did that in front of a Senate Commission, then it’s illegal.

Mind you, isn’t 21 a bit old for sleazy Bill and Andrew?

Clinton was asked, “is there a sexual relation between himself and Lewinsky” and he said “no”, and he was grammatically correct, as there were no longer any sexual relationship at that time. I am not defending Bill, but that’s the kind of shit the GOP went after him for.

[Kikapu]

The Democrats spent the last 4 years contesting the 2016 results.

No. That is called campaigning for the 2020 elections.

Come on Kikapu! You know that isn’t true.

No POTUS in the history of the US had been vilified and persecuted as much as this one. Everything from impeachment’s, false accusations, smearing with allegations ranging from the serious right down to how he looks, talks, and his mannerisms. No POTUS has ever had to tolerate as much as Trump, not even Nixon who really did break the law.

The Democrats never accepted the 2016 results because they thought it was the election they couldn’t lose.

Even the campaign for 2020 just seems that Trump is all over it as a campaign master with Biden and Camela clearly out of their depth.

The way things are going, Prince will be POTUS for the 8 years after Trump and then after that it will be Trump Jr as POTUS for 8 years. Can you imagine the salt?

Bill Clinton was vilified by the Republicans for 8 years, far far more than Trump.

At least Trump deserved most what he got. Clinton did not.

Bill Clinton vilified I mean come on.

They vilified him a little because he got a blow job from his intern.

Can you imagine impeaching a sitting President for “lying” about sex which is what the Republicans did, and here you have Trump admitting for grabbing women’s pussies as well as paying off call girls to keep quiet.

The GOP cunts went after Clinton on Whitewater, Paula Jones, Vince Foster’s suicide and on a on.

Oh come off it! Grabbing women in the you know what, especially if it’s consensual really ain’t an issue.

Clinton however got a blow job. No big deal really. Hardly think it’s a criminal matter if it’s consentual. But from memory, didn’t Monica complain? Which puts it in a different category towards abuse.

Look, Clinton is a sleazy little bugger. I wouldn’t like to be in his shoes either because he may have liked them very young on Orgy island. And the investigations have opened once again.

I hear he is good mates with Prince Andrew too. Must have rubbed shoulders a lot.

That’s the thing, it was not consensual most of the pussy grabbings Trump did. He was running the beauty contest and he would just go into the ladies dressing rooms at will.

It was consensual with Monica. Paula Jones claimed it was not when Bill was governor in Arkansas, which she sued him and won for sexual harassment.

Wasn’t Trump and Andrew together at times when the underage boinking was going at at Epstein’s parties?

[repulsewarrior]

...what does this have to do with COVID?

What is the difference with Clinton and Trump? They are both sleaze bags, for different reasons. But, at least Clinton's Legacy as a President is prosperity, a balanced budget, and Civil strife was not an issue.

(Clinton (his wife) may have lied about Benghazi, but then again she paid a price.)

...and the COVID; it is one thing to lie about your personal life, fact is, Trump lied about this threat to the public and that i think is something else.

[Kikapu]

...and the COVID; it is one thing to lie about your personal life, fact is, Trump lied about this threat to the public and that i think is something else.

I think Trump has even lied about having the Coronavirus himself. He wanted to project himself as a Super Human, who has defeated the virus in just few days, that he is a godsend. What a cunt!

[Tim Drayton]

So, overall, I would say that the cited article does provide some evidence from a non-peer reviewed article that Asians have higher susceptibility but a great deal more supporting evidence is needed to back up the argument that the US deep state consciously developed a virus that would target Asians alone, especially that showing that it was deliberately manufactured in this way, given that there may be, as Professor Adam has stated, genetic differences in susceptibility to naturally occurring viruses.

So you skipped the most damning evidence of a US lab/scientist boasting in 2015 of successfully modifying a corona-bat virus to jump from bats to humans smack on the border of China, eh...

Nice going!

If you would be good enough to provide a credible source for that allegation, I would be happy to look at it.

[Tim Drayton]

Well it looks like WHO has done a back flip. Better late than never.

They concede COVID isn’t the lethal monster they thought it was and they no longer recommend lock downs.

But I guarantee you that the governments (such as Dan Andrews) who would always cite WHO advice will ignore the latest WHO recommendations and continue to claim lick downs are imperative for public safety.

https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavir ... 7731c3da74

According to that article, Dr. David Nabarro from the WHO says:

“Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer.”

[Tim Drayton]

...as long as Covid virus keeps on increasing in numbers...

Can you spot the logical fallacy?:

I took a one litre sample of water from the tank on Sunday, and it contained 50 gr of salt. I took a two litre sample of water from the same tank on Monday. It contained 100 gr of salt, so the salinity of the water doubled in one day.

Likewise, Carl Heneghan, Professor of Evidence-Based Medicine, Director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and Director of Studies for the Evidence-Based Health Care Programme at the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, argues in the article titled

COVID cases in England aren’t rising: here’s why

https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/covid-cas ... heres-why/

that the increased amount of testing with the highly inaccurate tests currently in use is causing the apparent increase in cases.

[Tim Drayton]

...

This is where you don’t get it at all. The people you mention are not affected by anything. Gates, Bezos, and others like them can still travel on their yachts and business jets.

...

Precisely. The megarich are having a very good scam pandemic indeed:

Billionaires' wealth rises to $10.2 trillion amid Covid crisis
Super-rich increase fortunes by more than a quarter during market turmoil

https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... llionaires

World's billionaires get even richer during the coronavirus pandemic
The world's super-rich increased their combined wealth by a quarter during the coronavirus crisis, PwC and UBS have revealed.

https://www.dw.com/en/worlds-billionair ... a-55182129

US billionaires' wealth grew by $845 billion during the first six months of the pandemic

https://markets.businessinsider.com/new ... 1029599756

BILLIONAIRES’ PANDEMIC WEALTH GAINS BURST THROUGH $700B
https://americansfortaxfairness.org/iss ... urst-700b/

Just by way of contrast, the Wall Street Journal reports:

Coronavirus Has Thrown Around 100 Million People Into Extreme Poverty, World Bank Estimates

https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronaviru ... 1602086400

I really wish somebody could explain this thesis that the global ruling class could never wish to reduce the masses to destitution because they, too, would suffer, as the empirical data does not bear this out.

[Kikapu]

...as long as Covid virus keeps on increasing in numbers...

Can you spot the logical fallacy?:

I took a one litre sample of water from the tank on Sunday, and it contained 50 gr of salt. I took a two litre sample of water from the same tank on Monday. It contained 100 gr of salt, so the salinity of the water doubled in one day.

Likewise, Carl Heneghan, Professor of Evidence-Based Medicine, Director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and Director of Studies for the Evidence-Based Health Care Programme at the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, argues in the article titled

COVID cases in England aren’t rising: here’s why

https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/covid-cas ... heres-why/

that the increased amount of testing with the highly inaccurate tests currently in use is causing the apparent increase in cases.

Tim, there is a difference between positive Covid numbers rising and positive Covid percentages remaining the same or even going down based on number of tests performed. People in general understand and respond far better on the positive Covid numbers increasing/decreasing than the percentages. More testing does not make more positive Covid cases, but instead, it discovers more positive Covid cases which are already there. If there were to be zero testing, the positive Covid percentages will become zero also, but it does not mean there are zero positive Covid cases. In order for the economy to rebound, is to get the positive Covid cases out of people’s conscience, which is to keep it a secret from the people and just let them live or die while treating them. I think this is was Trump’s idea was recently when he wanted less testing. Regardless, whether positive Covid percentages remain the same or even decrease, as long as positive Covid numbers increases, that is what the people and the governments respond to. If a football stadium with an expected 50,000 spectators coming to watch the game has 10% positive Covid infected people or 5,000 positive Covid cases, people in general will focus more on the 5,000 number than the 10% number and stay away from the stadium all together, hence the continued damage to the economy as a result. This winter, the positive Covid percentage will go down even though the testing numbers for Covid will rise as people with cold related illnesses will be testing for Covid more than they are now.

[Tim Drayton]

An interesting little study.

Official statistics have it that 6,092 people of working age in England have died of Covid-19 this year out of a working age population of around 36.7 million. This makes for a percentage of 0.0166%.

Using freedom of information requests, a researcher has discovered that from among 1,641,281 employees, 76 were reported as having died of Covid-19. This makes for a percentage of 0.0046%.

Something appears to be wrong with the official figures.

Covid-19: The Data Exposing the Deception
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/covid- ... -deception