The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The Talks In Geneva

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Re: The Talks In Geneva

Postby repulsewarrior » Sat May 01, 2021 4:33 pm

...and i see two sides.

One that fundamentally see Cypriots as Cypriots, and the other split as "Greeks" and "Turks".

...why dismiss "being" Cypriot?
User avatar
repulsewarrior
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:13 am
Location: homeless in Canada

Re: The Talks In Geneva

Postby Nikitas » Tue May 04, 2021 1:29 pm

Two states means that the TCs will relinquish all claims to the south, inluding the EEZ of the south.

It also brings up a historic first, a truly independent GC state, totally free to enter into any agreement (defence, cooperation etc) with any nation it choses, and that includes union with any other state.

Tatar realises the implications of the above that is why he mentioned a post separation deal between the two states that he proposes. In other words he wants to play it each way, get an independent state for TCs and a perpetually bound state for the GCs.

And as always we heard what the TC side wants to get, but never what it wants to give in exchange. Like those territorial maps Akkinci submitted that were super confidential and never made public.

If the GC side had any intelligence at all, and any sense of geopolitics it would jump at the chance offered by Tata provided that the territorial issue was suitably settled.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7419
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Re: The Talks In Geneva

Postby Nikitas » Tue May 04, 2021 1:36 pm

Are there any TCs that believe that if the two state deal comes through there will be a ceremony in which the mainland Turks will hand over all power to the TCs, withdraw their troops, since they will be no longer needed, and just move back to Turkey?

Hands up, don't be shy to show your gullibility.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7419
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Re: The Talks In Geneva

Postby Mustiejodu » Sun Sep 19, 2021 9:50 pm

Ok why are the British army still in the south ????????? The answer to that question is the same answer as why Turkish army is in Cyprus and if you think it’s for any other reason then you are either too narrow minded or you just can’t see the truth
Mustiejodu
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2014 8:02 am

Re: The Talks In Geneva

Postby Mustiejodu » Sun Sep 19, 2021 9:52 pm

Why don’t anyone object to the British army being stationed in Cyprus ??? Don’t you think this is imperialistic and invasive of ROC
Mustiejodu
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 688
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2014 8:02 am

Re: The Talks In Geneva

Postby Lordo » Sun Sep 19, 2021 10:26 pm

Mustiejodu wrote:Why don’t anyone object to the British army being stationed in Cyprus ??? Don’t you think this is imperialistic and invasive of ROC

The Brits made sure that land remained as part of the Empire. It does not belong to the RoC.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15511
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: softalar, banana republic

Re: The Talks In Geneva

Postby repulsewarrior » Tue Sep 21, 2021 5:30 am

Indeed, once the narrative was set, "Greek" and "Turk", their position was secured; unjoined, Cypriots are silenced, as adversaries...

...but what can 'we' do?

Such as it is, what Flag do "they" treat as a rag?

...something to think about.
User avatar
repulsewarrior
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 10778
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:13 am
Location: homeless in Canada

Previous

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests