The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


La La Land

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Re: La La Land

Postby Lordo » Wed Jun 15, 2022 8:10 pm

Londonrake wrote:I could respond to this subject but instead:

I did wonder why you often react (usually quite provocatively) to posts which are in essence quite innocuous. Those clearly not really seeking a reply.

Now I understand.

You post a lot. It's very rare though for anybody to respond. The majority of the time you're in essence replying to your own posts. Just like on this thread. Which I have - a couple of times - referred to as a personal Blog.

Have you ever taken time to consider why people don't respond?

Nooooooooo not at all. New subject matter comes up that has to be mentioned.

For instance last night one of the refugees was kicked the hel lout of by the private security guards that took him to the airport. Al the other Refugees who were bound to go to Rwanda were in chains.

You see this is how you transport refugees. Civilisation indeed. What civilisation.

Don't feel obliged to respond. It is not necessary unless you have a point to make about the suject matter regarding accuracy. Otherwise what is the point of responding. Opinions don't count, they are like assholes, everybody has one.

Facts my dear fellow, facts till the day we die. That will be the last fact.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 21722
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

Re: La La Land

Postby Londonrake » Wed Jun 15, 2022 8:14 pm

Lordo wrote:
Londonrake wrote:I could respond to this subject but instead:

I did wonder why you often react (usually quite provocatively) to posts which are in essence quite innocuous. Those clearly not really seeking a reply.

Now I understand.

You post a lot. It's very rare though for anybody to respond. The majority of the time you're in essence replying to your own posts. Just like on this thread. Which I have - a couple of times - referred to as a personal Blog.

Have you ever taken time to consider why people don't respond?

Nooooooooo not at all. New subject matter comes up that has to be mentioned.

For instance last night one of the refugees was kicked the hel lout of by the private security guards that took him to the airport. Al the other Refugees who were bound to go to Rwanda were in chains.

You see this is how you transport refugees. Civilisation indeed. What civilisation.

Don't feel obliged to respond. It is not necessary unless you have a point to make about the suject matter regarding accuracy. Otherwise what is the point of responding. Opinions don't count, they are like assholes, everybody has one.

Facts my dear fellow, facts till the day we die. That will be the last fact.


Sorry. I am spoiling (just one of) your daily - slag the UK off - efforts. My apologies.
Londonrake
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5803
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:19 pm
Location: ROC

Re: La La Land

Postby Lordo » Wed Jun 15, 2022 8:17 pm

Londonrake wrote:
Lordo wrote:
Londonrake wrote:I could respond to this subject but instead:

I did wonder why you often react (usually quite provocatively) to posts which are in essence quite innocuous. Those clearly not really seeking a reply.

Now I understand.

You post a lot. It's very rare though for anybody to respond. The majority of the time you're in essence replying to your own posts. Just like on this thread. Which I have - a couple of times - referred to as a personal Blog.

Have you ever taken time to consider why people don't respond?

Nooooooooo not at all. New subject matter comes up that has to be mentioned.

For instance last night one of the refugees was kicked the hel lout of by the private security guards that took him to the airport. Al the other Refugees who were bound to go to Rwanda were in chains.

You see this is how you transport refugees. Civilisation indeed. What civilisation.

Don't feel obliged to respond. It is not necessary unless you have a point to make about the suject matter regarding accuracy. Otherwise what is the point of responding. Opinions don't count, they are like assholes, everybody has one.

Facts my dear fellow, facts till the day we die. That will be the last fact.


Sorry. I am spoiling (just one of) your daily - slag the UK off - efforts. My apologies.

There is no slagging, simple facts a 2 year old can understand.

Wait till they break both Brexit and GFA and see where we end up.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 21722
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

Re: La La Land

Postby Maximus » Wed Jun 15, 2022 8:44 pm

Lordo wrote:Especially when We are involved in making them homeless.


Did you know that since 2016, Iranians are the largest ethnic group seeking asylum in the UK?

The UK didnt make them homeless.

Did you also know that 80% of the top nationalities seeking asylum in the UK in 2019 -2020 where not made homeless by the UK?

Top nationalities seeking asylum are;

Iranians.
Iraqis*
Eritreans
Albanians
Syrians*
Afganis*
Sudanese
Vietnamese
Indians
Pakistanis
Dourkiyean

* Those wars, where the UK was involved are over.

How have they been made homeless now? The war ends and by virtue that there was a war, they can still claim to be refugees in the years ahead?

Nearly 80% of all applicants are male. There is a stark contrast to the Ukrainians, where (practically) all refugees are women and children.
Last edited by Maximus on Wed Jun 15, 2022 8:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Maximus
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7535
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: La La Land

Postby Lordo » Wed Jun 15, 2022 8:47 pm

Interesting to hear the truth for a bit. So they attempted to send people there without wating to see if the process is legal or not which will decided in a few weeks time. Of course instead of using Executive order, they could have put it through Parliament so it would be law and could not be challenged in court. I wonder why they decided not to put it to parliament.
After all they do have 80 majority rught? And of course they will try to do it again without wating for judicial review.

What an asshole government we have. Don't you just love facts.. ohps I meant slagging. Where is that slag? I know on a heap right?

https://www.facebook.com/watch?v=393249329414773

Last edited by Lordo on Wed Jun 15, 2022 9:04 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 21722
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

Re: La La Land

Postby Londonrake » Wed Jun 15, 2022 8:49 pm

"We"? I got the impression you wanted no part of it? Milti would put it much simpler.

Seriously, why don't you go to somewhere more acceptable to your socialist ideals? It being Wednesday, which is socialist ideal day. Tomorrow I think - IIRC - is supporting a butchering fascist dictator's efforts. Tens of thousands dead and millions of refugees. Although, he had no choice of course. It seems I simply don't understand why it was all necessary - in your psychotic world.

Switch!!! :eyecrazy:

Fridays are supporting military fascist juntas - responsible for killing 30,000 of their own people - well, people just like you actually. Then, with their backs finally against the wall, invading in order to court populist support?

If I've missed any of your particular chameleon-like support issues I do apologise.

Frankly, you have clearly done very well out of my country. Yet, you spend a good deal of your day denigrating it. It's a mystery to me why you don't do us both a favour and just fuck off to somewhere more appealing to you.

Yes Max. The man is "toxic" Aka a cunt. :wink:
Londonrake
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5803
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:19 pm
Location: ROC

Re: La La Land

Postby Maximus » Wed Jun 15, 2022 8:54 pm

Londonrake wrote:Yes Max. The man is "toxic" Aka a cunt. :wink:


If all of his idealogues were to every get implemented.

Civilization would absolutely collapse and we would all be back in the stone age, with a couple of twigs to rub together. :roll:

We would be very far from La la land.
Maximus
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7535
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: La La Land

Postby Londonrake » Wed Jun 15, 2022 9:01 pm

Maximus wrote:
Londonrake wrote:Yes Max. The man is "toxic" Aka a cunt. :wink:


If all of his idealogues were to every get implemented.

Civilization would absolutely collapse and we would all be back in the stone age, with a couple of twigs to rub together. :roll:


When people who think like Lordo and GR actually get into power we end up with gas chambers, gulags and killing fields. I would say "Heaven forbid" but history teaches us that it inevitably happens periodically. :(
Londonrake
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5803
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:19 pm
Location: ROC

Re: La La Land

Postby Maximus » Wed Jun 15, 2022 9:03 pm

Londonrake wrote:
Maximus wrote:
Londonrake wrote:Yes Max. The man is "toxic" Aka a cunt. :wink:


If all of his idealogues were to every get implemented.

Civilization would absolutely collapse and we would all be back in the stone age, with a couple of twigs to rub together. :roll:


When people who think like Lordo and GR actually get into power we end up with gas chambers, gulags and killing fields. I would say "Heaven forbid" but history teaches us that it inevitably happens periodically. :(


You forgot the indoctrination, re-education camps. Thats the leftist's way for anyone who disagrees with them.
Maximus
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7535
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: La La Land

Postby Lordo » Wed Jun 15, 2022 9:09 pm

Londonrake wrote:
Maximus wrote:
Londonrake wrote:Yes Max. The man is "toxic" Aka a cunt. :wink:


If all of his idealogues were to every get implemented.

Civilization would absolutely collapse and we would all be back in the stone age, with a couple of twigs to rub together. :roll:


When people who think like Lordo and GR actually get into power we end up with gas chambers, gulags and killing fields. I would say "Heaven forbid" but history teaches us that it inevitably happens periodically. :(


Put it another way, if Lordo was in power UK would not go war anywhere unless the soldiers of another country are within 12 miles of the shoreline of the UK.

There would be no bombs dropped on
Yemenis
Afghanis
Iraqis
Syrians
Libyans

There would be no weapons supplied to anybody.
And if America followed likewise, there would be a hell of a lot refugees too.

By all means post away what is wrong with what I say. But bullshit is like water off a ducks back. My bulshitto meter warns me in good time to ignore it.

Shall I continue?
User avatar
Lordo
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 21722
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free. Walk on Swine walk on

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests