The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The hypocrisy of Turkey

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Postby CopperLine » Mon Jun 07, 2010 6:55 pm

Jerry wrote:
CopperLine wrote:Piratis,
Turkey is not a person, like Cyprus it is a state. As states they do not possess a single and unitary consciousness therefore neither Turkey nor Cyprus (nor any other state, even Israel) can be hypocritical. Start again.


Surely the government of a state can be referred to as hypocrites, so the policy of that government could be said to be hypocritical.

"The hypocrisy of Turkey" can be interpreted as shorthand for "The hypocrisy of the government of Turkey"

You are splitting hairs simply to have a pop at Piratis, Copperline.


Hypocrisy :
The assuming of a false appearance of virtue or goodness, with dissimulation of real character or inclinations
States can have contradictory, inconsistent, or bad policies; politicians and diplomats etc can lie, cheat and kill for the state; but states cannot be hypocritical, true or good.

This is not splitting hairs, any more than it is splitting hairs to argue against characterising Greek Cypriots as being cheats or Turkish Cypriots as being lazy, or Turks as being killers. These people, like states, are not essentially any particular thing.

Having posted this explanation if I did this simply to assume a false appearance eg one who didn't give a damn about the proper meaning of hypocrite and just did this to dissimulate my real character to have a "pop at Piratis" (there are much easier ways, surely), then I would indeed be guilty of hypocrisy. But I'm not. :)
User avatar
CopperLine
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:04 pm

Postby Jerry » Mon Jun 07, 2010 7:50 pm

CopperLine wrote:
Jerry wrote:
CopperLine wrote:Piratis,
Turkey is not a person, like Cyprus it is a state. As states they do not possess a single and unitary consciousness therefore neither Turkey nor Cyprus (nor any other state, even Israel) can be hypocritical. Start again.


Surely the government of a state can be referred to as hypocrites, so the policy of that government could be said to be hypocritical.

"The hypocrisy of Turkey" can be interpreted as shorthand for "The hypocrisy of the government of Turkey"

You are splitting hairs simply to have a pop at Piratis, Copperline.


Hypocrisy :
The assuming of a false appearance of virtue or goodness, with dissimulation of real character or inclinations
States can have contradictory, inconsistent, or bad policies; politicians and diplomats etc can lie, cheat and kill for the state; but states cannot be hypocritical, true or good.

This is not splitting hairs, any more than it is splitting hairs to argue against characterising Greek Cypriots as being cheats or Turkish Cypriots as being lazy, or Turks as being killers. These people, like states, are not essentially any particular thing.

Having posted this explanation if I did this simply to assume a false appearance eg one who didn't give a damn about the proper meaning of hypocrite and just did this to dissimulate my real character to have a "pop at Piratis" (there are much easier ways, surely), then I would indeed be guilty of hypocrisy. But I'm not. :)


The government of a state is made up of identifiable individuals who could be described as hypocrites - I'm sure you can figure the rest out. :lol:
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4729
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Postby ttoli » Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:57 pm

Paphitis wrote:Personally speaking, I would rather see Israel in the EU. We can live with them as we have more in common.

How exactly???????????, Both persecute the minority population??, Tight as a ducks arse??, Big Nose(Coz air is free!)??. You tell me
User avatar
ttoli
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 594
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:39 pm
Location: Here

Postby Bananiot » Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:04 pm

Piratis left it late but he did hoist an Israeli flag eventually. The situation as it is unfolding poses a real dilemma for all the bash patriots. This is because a good and proper bash patriot must be antisemitic and a Turk eater. Piratis and all the bash patriots of the forum chose the second. Why am I not surprised?
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby Oracle » Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:12 pm

The beauty of this scenario is that the two tribes might weaken each other enough to give the rest of us a break.

I don't think anyone is seriously backing one or the other. Just hoping they will knock each other out senseless [except, they already are!]

The right thing will happen in the end.

And Cyprus, as one whole, united restored island is the only right course ...
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby YFred » Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:57 pm

Oracle wrote:The beauty of this scenario is that the two tribes might weaken each other enough to give the rest of us a break.

I don't think anyone is seriously backing one or the other. Just hoping they will knock each other out senseless [except, they already are!]

The right thing will happen in the end.

And Cyprus, as one whole, united restored island is the only right course ...

Dream on. They are not allowed. They have common master and a very tight leash.

This will be a war with proxy. Just as they armed the TMT and the Bosnians, they will also arm Hamas right under the noses of the chosen tribe.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby denizaksulu » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:13 pm

Oracle wrote:The beauty of this scenario is that the two tribes might weaken each other enough to give the rest of us a break.

I don't think anyone is seriously backing one or the other. Just hoping they will knock each other out senseless [except, they already are!]

The right thing will happen in the end.

And Cyprus, as one whole, united restored island is the only right course ...


An important point here Oracle is that there are no intelligent people with a military mind on this forum (apart from GR(possibly)) to tell us forumers that in the event of hostilities in the area, Cyprus will be sucked in big time. No one can foresee any results of any conflict in the area. But ofcourse Computer gamers will come up with many scenarios - but all fictional.
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby YFred » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:30 pm

denizaksulu wrote:
Oracle wrote:The beauty of this scenario is that the two tribes might weaken each other enough to give the rest of us a break.

I don't think anyone is seriously backing one or the other. Just hoping they will knock each other out senseless [except, they already are!]

The right thing will happen in the end.

And Cyprus, as one whole, united restored island is the only right course ...


An important point here Oracle is that there are no intelligent people with a military mind on this forum (apart from GR(possibly)) to tell us forumers that in the event of hostilities in the area, Cyprus will be sucked in big time. No one can foresee any results of any conflict in the area. But ofcourse Computer gamers will come up with many scenarios - but all fictional.

All GiRa has is a playstation game with a small joystick which he plays daily. Military expert, I think not. He looks at an elephant and sees an ant.

A true ant&dec if ever I saw one.
User avatar
YFred
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12100
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Lurucina-Upon-Thames

Postby denizaksulu » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:32 pm

YFred wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Oracle wrote:The beauty of this scenario is that the two tribes might weaken each other enough to give the rest of us a break.

I don't think anyone is seriously backing one or the other. Just hoping they will knock each other out senseless [except, they already are!]

The right thing will happen in the end.

And Cyprus, as one whole, united restored island is the only right course ...


An important point here Oracle is that there are no intelligent people with a military mind on this forum (apart from GR(possibly)) to tell us forumers that in the event of hostilities in the area, Cyprus will be sucked in big time. No one can foresee any results of any conflict in the area. But ofcourse Computer gamers will come up with many scenarios - but all fictional.

All GiRa has is a playstation game with a small joystick which he plays daily. Military expert, I think not. He looks at an elephant and sees an ant.

A true ant&dec if ever I saw one.



:roll: :shock: :shock: :? 8) :oops: :x :evil: :twisted: :?: :idea:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby repulsewarrior » Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:40 pm

...cyprus dear O will be a shithole with the "Palestinian" fear here.

it is an issue of control; Turkey remembers 200 years back, it appears neo Ottoman, unable to find progress in the way of Kemal, they choose as Kemalists to look at the roots too deeply. mix this with the opportunity in a Muslim Alliance so that this face is defined in a stature which can overcome their Jewish adversary, while providing to Europe an equal.

maybe the Muslims will bend the Jews for Israel; and maybe the Muslims will bend in Cyprus for the Occidental world.

...but it will be filled with the horror which has actually escaped us for so long. i am not sure there are soldiers as brave as the Canadians representing the UN here. when the terror breaks, they will be forced to withdraw. anyway the shiny lining is that between 200 and 800 years from now, Cyprus will be what it should be, a beautiful garden.

in the mean time, with our little Problem, (afterall the population is not 12.5 million), we should focus on the words of the Pope (although for political reasons it's a shame he had to say these things), because the issues are not "Jew" and "Greek" and "Turk"and "Arab", and it requires a definition for People who are Individuals within a State, and Persons within a Society. Bicommunal suits these needs.

similarly, as in other situations in this region, the land is spotted with Communities which adapt, having their distinctiveness as a result of their closeness to the land. Bizonal as i've described it allows for this natural behaviour.

really, i don't know what it is which keeps people mum. a Unitary State is possible in Cyprus, which satisfies the Turks if it is perfection they seek. with the existence of National Assemblies who provide for Minorities as Majorities; and whose Charters are held by a Federal Government that is Sovereign in our defence as Individuals: having Rights equal without any other distinction, the world as well as ourselves will be bettered.

Treaties can be written, one between Turkey and Cyprus is due; a wonderful way for each to recognise the other, ...however, one hopes that as people with reason a less cruel "solution" is found, other than violence that becomes war.

...please reread my manifesto.

xxoxoxo
User avatar
repulsewarrior
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 13945
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:13 am
Location: homeless in Canada

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests