Cyprus-Forum.com

[Get Real!]

What clearly motivated the man was the doodles of muhummad.

He then attempted to use the war to justify his attempted slaughter of innocent people because islamic teaching justifies the slaughter of infidels during war.

I believe this is the case because if the war was his primary motive, then he could have easily targeted the UK as he use to live in Luton.

Whilst a muslim can also justify the killing of RC priests as they can be viewed as attempting to create apostates.

It's not about ridiculing islam, it's about exposing how its teachings can be used to justify evil.

Never mind the teachings of Islam you 2-cent piece of shit… it’s what motivates British and American war criminal punks to destroy the nation of Iraq and murder 1.5 million people in the process, that you should be worrying about!

[Get Real!]

The problem is the fact that most of you British and Americans are illegitimate garbage born out of wedlock to a mother who was a whore and a father who was a drunken pimp, and THAT is why you turn out this way!

There is no other logical explanation as to why you’re such war criminals, why you’re so cruel, barbaric, racist, and ignorant!

[Me Ed]

What clearly motivated the man was the doodles of muhummad.

He then attempted to use the war to justify his attempted slaughter of innocent people because islamic teaching justifies the slaughter of infidels during war.

I believe this is the case because if the war was his primary motive, then he could have easily targeted the UK as he use to live in Luton.

Whilst a muslim can also justify the killing of RC priests as they can be viewed as attempting to create apostates.

It's not about ridiculing islam, it's about exposing how its teachings can be used to justify evil.

Never mind the teachings of Islam you 2-cent piece of shit… it’s what motivates British and American war criminal punks to destroy the nation of Iraq and murder 1.5 million people in the process, that you should be worrying about!

Again, stop tolling and stick to the thread.

This is about the Swedish terrorist attacks.

Stick to your [insert name or country here] [are or is] commiting war crimes threads.

[Schnauzer]

Christians, in this day and age, do not kill innocents the name of God, where as the islamists do.

Remember how many RC priests have been slaughtered in Turkey recently.

Before engaging in battle, the 'Padre' is available for to those who are about to 'Carry out their duties' to Queen and Country.

Many innocents are slaughtered in the process and such deaths have been been recently proven.

It's not ALL bad news however, the Military have terms for such deaths, 'Collateral Damage', 'Friendly Fire' and several others which they feel justifies the taking of life "In the name of God".

As to the recent slaughter of the RC priests, I think you will find that the tenets of 'Islam' provide adequately for those who falsely adorn the robes of righteousness OR, practise the habit of groping under the 'Cassocks' of vulnerable young choir-boys.

Christians advocate the 'Slapping of hands' for such crimes.

Islamists favour 'Beheading', as a more effective punishment AND warning, even though the innocent may pay for the crimes of the guilty in some cases.

Which seems to negate your first and explain your second point.

What a bizzaire argument, but its what I've come to expect from defenders of islamic evil by pointing the finger at others instead of extolling the virtues of the so-called religion of tolerance and peace.

I'm no lover of the RC church, but the only reason these priests were slaughtered is because they were preaching in a "free" and "secular" country.

How many imams have been slaughtered in the EU in recent years?

"Ah now Paddy, you have to face the truth"

You need to stick to the thread my friend.

You asked what motivated this man to do what he did.

I showed that in islam there are teachings that give this man licence for what he did.

He used the war and some doodles to justify to himself that what he was going to do is allahs will, even though the imam in Luton tried to talk him out of these extremist views a couple of years ago although what one imam teaches from one mosque to another can vary quite widely.

When I put this forward all you did was attempt to deflect the argument to other religions.

You began your 'Analysis' by introducing the subject of '72 Virgins', moved on to claim that the man was a 'Saddo' because he sought a second Wife (perfectly acceptable to his faith) then introduced the subject of the slaughter of the RC 'Priests' in Turkey.

I cannot accept your criticism therefore.

It would be very difficult to determine what motivated the chap, WITHOUT discussing the tenets of Islam and comparing them with those of other faiths.

Even more so if those discussing the issue (like yourself) merely seek to degrade the faith of Islam by ridiculing it. (IMHO).

What clearly motivated the man was the doodles of muhummad.

He then attempted to use the war to justify his attempted slaughter of innocent people because islamic teaching justifies the slaughter of infidels during war.

I believe this is the case because if the war was his primary motive, then he could have easily targeted the UK as he use to live in Luton.

Whilst a muslim can also justify the killing of RC priests as they can be viewed as attempting to create apostates.

It's not about ridiculing islam, it's about exposing how its teachings can be used to justify evil.

I take your point here Me Ed, what I really would have liked to develop was the question of 'Belief', the differences and originations of them.

For as much as a child is 'Taught' by those who have the responsibility to 'Teach', it is also possible to distort the principles of the lessons.

Initially, ALL societies must set out to impose whatever tenets they consider to be best for THEM, the problems start when one society which has different tenets, attempts to impose it's will upon another.

If the imposer is unable to exhibit a 'Superior' system, it will not be acceptable to those imposed upon.

I consider the Western culture to be inferior to many of those of the East, the devotion to Islam by it's followers is vividly obvious throughout the world, ultimately it must prevail IF the world truly seeks 'Peace on Earth'.

There is much justice in the perception that the West is intent on destroying the reputation of Islam (imho).

Ugliness has always despised beauty.

Many thanks for your participation..................... Goodnight.

[bsharpish]

The problem is the fact that most of you British and Americans are illegitimate garbage born out of wedlock to a mother who was a whore and a father who was a drunken pimp, and THAT is why you turn out this way!

There is no other logical explanation as to why you’re such war criminals, why you’re so cruel, barbaric, racist, and ignorant!

Finally you complete your modus operandi -

1. Find dubious source
2. Twist pseudo facts even further to reflect own POV
3. Present said dubious bullshit as credible facts with multiple links to
multiple sites, most, lacking any credibility or voracity
4. Repeat at least 20 times in vain hope that yours is the last word
5. Gradually slip into bigotry and attempts to belittle naysayers
6. Make tin foil hat to stop naughty Anglo\British mind experiments
7. Become offensive and Insulting proving your own ignorance and racism
8. Convince yourself that you are some form of freedom fighter
9. More personal insults

Here's an idea which may improve your self esteem and stop the need for incessant attention seeking -

SHOW THE COURAGE OF YOUR CONVICTIONS..... plenty of planes heading east from Larnaca every week... from there its a short donkey\moped\toyota truck ride to the sharp end of the conflicts you seem to feel so strongly about.
Plenty to pick from as well -

Palestine
Iraq
Afghanistan

I'm sure you'd be welcomed by all the interested parties.

Unfortunately I'm sure that -

10. run home to mummy for a good cry
11. return and repeat 1-10

Is a whole lot more likely

[Get Real!]

"A civilization which leaves so large a number of its participants unsatisfied and drives them into revolt neither has nor deserves the prospect of a lasting existence."

Sigmund Freud

[Get Real!]

"America is a mistake, a giant mistake."

Sigmund Freud

[Get Real!]

"America is the most grandiose experiment the world has seen, but, I am afraid, it is not going to be a success."

Sigmund Freud

[Me Ed]

Christians, in this day and age, do not kill innocents the name of God, where as the islamists do.

Remember how many RC priests have been slaughtered in Turkey recently.

Before engaging in battle, the 'Padre' is available for to those who are about to 'Carry out their duties' to Queen and Country.

Many innocents are slaughtered in the process and such deaths have been been recently proven.

It's not ALL bad news however, the Military have terms for such deaths, 'Collateral Damage', 'Friendly Fire' and several others which they feel justifies the taking of life "In the name of God".

As to the recent slaughter of the RC priests, I think you will find that the tenets of 'Islam' provide adequately for those who falsely adorn the robes of righteousness OR, practise the habit of groping under the 'Cassocks' of vulnerable young choir-boys.

Christians advocate the 'Slapping of hands' for such crimes.

Islamists favour 'Beheading', as a more effective punishment AND warning, even though the innocent may pay for the crimes of the guilty in some cases.

Which seems to negate your first and explain your second point.

What a bizzaire argument, but its what I've come to expect from defenders of islamic evil by pointing the finger at others instead of extolling the virtues of the so-called religion of tolerance and peace.

I'm no lover of the RC church, but the only reason these priests were slaughtered is because they were preaching in a "free" and "secular" country.

How many imams have been slaughtered in the EU in recent years?

"Ah now Paddy, you have to face the truth"

You need to stick to the thread my friend.

You asked what motivated this man to do what he did.

I showed that in islam there are teachings that give this man licence for what he did.

He used the war and some doodles to justify to himself that what he was going to do is allahs will, even though the imam in Luton tried to talk him out of these extremist views a couple of years ago although what one imam teaches from one mosque to another can vary quite widely.

When I put this forward all you did was attempt to deflect the argument to other religions.

You began your 'Analysis' by introducing the subject of '72 Virgins', moved on to claim that the man was a 'Saddo' because he sought a second Wife (perfectly acceptable to his faith) then introduced the subject of the slaughter of the RC 'Priests' in Turkey.

I cannot accept your criticism therefore.

It would be very difficult to determine what motivated the chap, WITHOUT discussing the tenets of Islam and comparing them with those of other faiths.

Even more so if those discussing the issue (like yourself) merely seek to degrade the faith of Islam by ridiculing it. (IMHO).

What clearly motivated the man was the doodles of muhummad.

He then attempted to use the war to justify his attempted slaughter of innocent people because islamic teaching justifies the slaughter of infidels during war.

I believe this is the case because if the war was his primary motive, then he could have easily targeted the UK as he use to live in Luton.

Whilst a muslim can also justify the killing of RC priests as they can be viewed as attempting to create apostates.

It's not about ridiculing islam, it's about exposing how its teachings can be used to justify evil.

I take your point here Me Ed, what I really would have liked to develop was the question of 'Belief', the differences and originations of them.

For as much as a child is 'Taught' by those who have the responsibility to 'Teach', it is also possible to distort the principles of the lessons.

Initially, ALL societies must set out to impose whatever tenets they consider to be best for THEM, the problems start when one society which has different tenets, attempts to impose it's will upon another.

If the imposer is unable to exhibit a 'Superior' system, it will not be acceptable to those imposed upon.

I consider the Western culture to be inferior to many of those of the East, the devotion to Islam by it's followers is vividly obvious throughout the world, ultimately it must prevail IF the world truly seeks 'Peace on Earth'.

There is much justice in the perception that the West is intent on destroying the reputation of Islam (imho).

Ugliness has always despised beauty.

Many thanks for your participation..................... Goodnight.

A very naïve view of islam because when they run out of infidels, they usually turn on each other ...

Goodnight.

[bsharpish]

A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
Winston Churchill