Cyprus-Forum.com

[miltiades]

Bending over backwards to appease a sect that considers non participants to their brand of " faith" as ....infidels. May stop patronising and get on with knitting you useless bloody woman !

[Paphitis]

What you said is NOT far fetched.

Australia has requested that Turkey be removed or evicted from the F-35 Consortium because it has bought Russian Made S400 missiles.

The concern is that Turkey is selling classified technical information to the Russians and jeopardising the entire F-35 project.

The US Government has introduced a Bill to prevent the handover of F-35 aircraft to Turkey.

Australia has made an official representation to its partners and the US Government. Australia has indicated to the US Government that Turkey is a massive security concern for the Commonwealth of Australia.

Australia what is her contribution to alliance compared with Turkey, apart from genocide of Aborigines !

Turkey will get both, F-35 and S-400 unfortunately!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZuznkI4UIk

Australia's Contribution to the alliance is a lot more vast.

Australia is an Echelon 5 eye partner, has some of the most secretive and covert bases on the planet (Pine Gap) and is part of the US Nuclear Submarine Communications Network.

Australia has also contributed to virtually all wars, including Vietnam,

Australia also attends all NATO summits.

Don't worry about the Aboriginal Genocide. You seem to be grasping for straws. There was NEVER an Aboriginal Genocide because if there was, then quite clearly Australians are not very good at genocide. Wiping out the Aborigines would have been easy, but Australia never wanted to or even tried. There was never ever any need. Sure there were injustices some 250 years ago. But genocide? no there was no genocide. There was a stolen generation. That is when the Australian Government would seize Aboriginal Children and raise them (it was thought to be for their own good) but even that was at the time "well intended" or so they thought, but an injustice and a crime in hindsight of course in this day and age because it caused a lot of damage to the Aboriginal Children because they were forcibly detached from their families.

Cool story bro!
Do they still hunt Aborigines for sport?

http://allthatsinteresting.com/australia-genocide

It's not a story. What I am telling you is FACT. Real Australian history.

Australian Authorities never had as part of their policy a process of extermination. genocide was NEVER pursued by any Australian Policy or by ther early settlers that came to Australia.

On the contrary, there was always a policy to co-exist.

Occasionally, there were some flare ups where farmers would shoot aboriginal trespasses because the Aborigines never had or understood land ownership in the Western or European sense that we have today, but rather had more of a communal ownership of the land which the Europeans never understood. So of course some were killed, but that isn't genocide, because if you just went around killing Aboriginals, then you would likely end up in one of the Penal Colonies with other convicts and you would probably even get the Death Penalty in those days. In those days, white men were killed or shot by trespassing on other's land. That is just the way things were. It was a frontier land that was just starting out with limited infrastructure and hardly no law and order so everyone carried a gun and protected what they had. It was EXACTLY like in the coyboy movies. You could also challenge a man to a gunfight, legally. And kill him in front of the pub!

During the gold rush, you would get shot and killed for trespassing on someone's mining lease or claim. It was presumed you are stealing. Australia had only started to become into being as we know it today. It isn't an England with Hundreds of years of history. Or a Germany or a Greece. It was a European Colony of settlers. There was also a thriving community of Chinese migrants already coming in for the Gold Rush. They too would kill anyone that came across their mining lease, that included white men and Aborigines. Yes, A China Man could kill a European.

It wouldn't take much to get the Death Penalty though. If you stole another farmers Cattle, it would probably earn you an appointment with the Hangman.

Aborigines were considered as part of Australian Fauna. If you cleared Australian Fauna you would be dealt with very harshly as sometimes Fauna was more protected than humans. That is the way it was 250 years ago.

Yes there was however the stolen generation. These Aborigines were NOT killed, but rather protected and taken to education facilities - usually Christian (Anglican and Catholic) Monasteries, Schools and Colonies were they were looked after and raised, clothed and fed. This was a policy as there was an attempt to educate them to Western European ways which were considered superior (no one knew any better).

No country or historian HAS EVER condemned Australia or Australians as having any policy of extermination or genocide so I am sorry.

The other thing is this. I find it quite insulting that I have to write these words to defend Australia to a Turk. I mean you got to laugh.

Now, the Aboriginal Population was never about a million. The fact is, no one ever knew how many Aborigines existed. The population of Aborigines today is about 400,000. If there were only a few thousand, their population today wouldn't be so high. And if there was an extermination, then they probably would have been wiped out like they were in Tasmania by the farmers.

The biggest killer of Aborigines was always the exotic diseases European Settlers bought with them - such as Small Pox, Measles, Influenza, and other diseases and illness. Another big killer was Alcohol. These illnesses never existed in Australia and the Aborigines never had any immunity to be able to combat these diseases. Hence they suffered a great deal as they were exposed to diseases they never been exposed to before.

[Paphitis]

NB: Irrelevant to this thread…



So what do you make of that boys?

Well said Theresa.

Eid Mubarak to all our Muslim brothers and sisters!

[miltiades]

NB: Irrelevant to this thread…



So what do you make of that boys?

Well said Theresa.

Eid Mubarak to all our Muslim brothers and sisters!

Does this include ...Hamas, Hesbolah, ISIS
and all of the suicide bombers ??

[Paphitis]

NB: Irrelevant to this thread…



So what do you make of that boys?

Well said Theresa.

Eid Mubarak to all our Muslim brothers and sisters!

Does this include ...Hamas, Hesbolah, ISIS
and all of the suicide bombers ??

When I wish people a Merry Christmas or a Happy New Year, I do not include serial murderers, murderers and rapists either.

Use your brain old fart!

[miltiades]

The difference here boy is , outside Islam, no other "organized" entity murders innocent people in the name of their fictitious god. Hamas, Hesbollah, and generally all violent Islamic units commit hideous crimes believing that Allah will reward them. This sect is a demonic, vicious entity and should not be given credibility by political leaders. Islam is a fallacy, a virus, a dangerous ideology. This is by no means an attack on muslims but on the so called religion that spreads hatred and division .
Boy grow up .

[Paphitis]

Don’t be a fucking idiot. You are clueless and haven’t a friggin idea.

Ku Klux Klan was comprised of radical Christians.

IRA was linked to Catholicism.

EOKA was linked to Archbishop Makarios.

There are countless examples such as these.

Fact is, I bet only 0.1% of Muslims are involved with radical organisations. Probably only 10% are radical Islamists, 40% are moderates and the other 50% probably don’t give a stuff or even practice.

[miltiades]

I take it that KKK were blowing them selves up in churches whilst screaming out Jesus Christ, same as EOKA !!
Your comparisons are same to your comparing Pearl Harbour to the poisoning of the Russian father and daughter !!
Mate your logic is that of a dead fish !

[Paphitis]

I take it that KKK were blowing them selves up in churches whilst screaming out Jesus Christ, same as EOKA !!
Your comparisons are same to your comparing Pearl Harbour to the poisoning of the Russian father and daughter !!
Mate your logic is that of a dead fish !

What is the fucking difference between Lynch Mobs hanging (murdering) innocent people just because they are black?

What is the difference between an IRA attack on a British Underground Train Station?

Also, yes, the chemical attack in Britain was with a military grade Chemical Weapon. no different to using an F-35 or F-22 to illegally bomb a country and no different to Pearl Harbour.

make no mistake about it! It was a military operation alright. A very illegal attack against Britain and its citizens. It was at the very least a very serious provocation, and probably an act of war against Britain and possibly a Casus Belli.

In fact, the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour may even be a lot more legal than the attack in Britain with a military grade chemical weapon because Japan declared war on the USA offcially and we can all be grateful for this very grave error by the Japanese because that bought the USA into WW2.

If it wasn't for that, you would all be German Speakers in Europe.

[miltiades]

Full of pure shit, and true to form.
You are a first class fucking idiot.
Hey stupid , neither the IRA, the KKK or EOKA BLEW THEMSELVES UP AMONGST INNOCENT PEOPLE IN THE BELIEF THAT THIS IMAGINARY GOD OF THEIRS WOULD SUPPLY THEM WITH PLENTY VIRGINS TO FUCK. Now just fuck off, you sre a fucking idiot, assiktir malaka