Cyprus-Forum.com

[Paphitis]

You are a fucking idiot. War's have started for a lot less.

This was a chemical attack on British Soil by a State Actor (Russia) with a military grade weapon. A MILITARY GRADE weapon.

It was an act of war. It was an extremely serious provocation. It was an attack on British Soil. It is indeed a casus belli.

There really isn't any hyperbole here. None at all.

And in addition. You are very serious issues and also double standards. You are talking about the entire Islamic faith as if they ALL subscribe to radical Islamic beliefs and all believe in a caliphate and want to wage war against the "infidel". This isn't true at all. nothing can be more false.And then you insinuate that Westerners don't blow themselves up in markets. well, westerners have also committed similar acts. Whether you talk about EOKA, or the IRA or even the Ku Klux Klan, there are indeed parallels with Islamic organisations such as Hezbollah, ISIL and Hamaz which btw you are a supporter of and do not even know it because you are too friggin dumb.

[miltiades]

An ....act of ...war.!!!!!!!
Shut up stupid !!!

[Paphitis]

An ....act of ...war.!!!!!!!
Shut up stupid !!!

You shut up idiot.

if the use of a military grade chemical weapon on a country isn't an act of war then nothing is. You are senile and sooo stupid.

Yes it was an act of war. It was an illegal act and a serious provocation. It was also a casus belli. It was a Black Op against Britain by Russia.

it is most definitely a Cold War act against a sovereign country within its own borders against its own citizens.

If Turkey, sent operatives and used Sarin to assassinate Cypriot Citizens within the Republic of Cyprus, then that is an act of war. It is illegal and there is no different to the use of an F-16 to bomb Paphos. Not one iota of difference at all!

[Paphitis]

Let's be very clear here.

If Turkey, had instigated a covert Black Op in Cyprus to assassinate 2 RoC citizens with the use of whatever, or had utilized its Special Forces or Intelligence Services to subvert the Government of Cyprus or instigate a Coup in the RoC or used a Chemical Weapon or other poisons to knock off 2 Cypriot Citizens because they were once Turkish Spies who had turned, then this would be nothing other than a military Black Op against The Republic of Cyprus and it would also be a highly illegal action, a serious provocation and even an act of war and a casus beli.

Now, there is probably stuff all Cyprus can do about it but it does not change the fact that this would be a very a serious attack against the RoC, a serious provocation or an act of war.

[miltiades]

General, when will you be declaring war on Russia. Please wait until the world cup finishes.
By the way here are some facts.
Pearl Harbour fatalities 1200 plus
Injuries 2400 plus. Russian ...attack on Britain ZERO fatalities 2 injured as a result of food poisoning.
Now had you compared it to ...Hiroshima I would understand.
Incidentally, did EOKA fighters drove vans mowing people down, perhaps the IRA ?Maybe they blew themselves up in restaurants, buses, weddings, funeral processions , churches.
Are you realy so fucking stupid or just winding me up.
By rhe way , POOOTIN 5 The Crook of Saudi ZERO. Bet that made you exuberantly happy, more so that no nation has boycotted the world cup. A final between Russia and England is my ...prediction. Of course I shall be supporting England.

[Paphitis]

General, when will you be declaring war on Russia. Please wait until the world cup finishes.
By the way here are some facts.
Pearl Harbour fatalities 1200 plus
Injuries 2400 plus. Russian ...attack on Britain ZERO fatalities 2 injured as a result of food poisoning.
Now had you compared it to ...Hiroshima I would understand.
Incidentally, did EOKA fighters drove vans mowing people down, perhaps the IRA ?Maybe they blew themselves up in restaurants, buses, weddings, funeral processions , churches.
Are you realy so fucking stupid or just winding me up.
By rhe way , POOOTIN 5 The Crook of Saudi ZERO. Bet that made you exuberantly happy, more so that no nation has boycotted the world cup. A final between Russia and England is my ...prediction. Of course I shall be supporting England.

An act of aggression isn't defined by the number of fatalities. There are no fatalities even required for something to be deemed by a country to be an act of aggression, or even a Casus Belli.

It makes no difference whether there were no fatalities (by pure fluke) or just 1 or 1200 or more. An attack that causes the death of 1200 people isn't more serious than an attack that kills just 100 people. According to the Geneva Convention, they both constitute a military operation against another country. A Turkish F-16 that bombs Paphos illegally and kills 20 people is not any less serious than the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour that killed 1200 people. The legal standing of both attacks under International law is the same.

An attack against a country could be through the use of a military grade chemical weapon. In fact, even if it wasn't military grade and some covert operatives used Arsenic, it would still classify as an attack against that country and a military operation. A Cyber Attack against a country can be deemed as an act of war or aggression.

Even if Russia managed to shut down Britain's Electricity grid, this is an attack against Britain.

An act of war could be purely from a financial loss, such as when another State power shuts down the electricity grid of another country resulting in Billions worth of losses or more.

[miltiades]

What you are saying is that if a man steals a loaf of bread its no different to a man robbing a bank !!

[Robin Hood]

General, when will you be declaring war on Russia. Please wait until the world cup finishes.
By the way here are some facts.
Pearl Harbour fatalities 1200 plus
Injuries 2400 plus. Russian ...attack on Britain ZERO fatalities 2 injured as a result of food poisoning.
Now had you compared it to ...Hiroshima I would understand.
Incidentally, did EOKA fighters drove vans mowing people down, perhaps the IRA ?Maybe they blew themselves up in restaurants, buses, weddings, funeral processions , churches.
Are you realy so fucking stupid or just winding me up.
By rhe way , POOOTIN 5 The Crook of Saudi ZERO. Bet that made you exuberantly happy, more so that no nation has boycotted the world cup. A final between Russia and England is my ...prediction. Of course I shall be supporting England.

An attack isn't defined by the number of fatalities.

It makes no difference whether there were no fatalities (by pure fluke) or just 1 or 1200 or more. An attack that causes the death of 1200 people isn't more serious than an attack that kills just 100 people. According to the Geneva Convention, they both constitute an attack.

An attack against a country could be through the use of a military grade chemical weapon. In fact, it even if it wasn't military grade and some covert operatives used Arsenic, it would still cl;classify as an attack against that country and a military operation.

Even if Russia managed to shut down Britain's Electricity grid, this is an attack against Britain.

The evidence that Russia had anything what so ever to do with this .......... is?

In short there isn't any evidence at all ! In reality, considering all the FACTS available, the finger of most probable guilt points at UK government deep implication and a cover up. So you have no foundation at all for your stupid comments!

[Paphitis]

What you are saying is that if a man steals a loaf of bread its no different to a man robbing a bank !!

Both are thief but your analogy is a false dichotomy.

Acts of aggression can as I said be a result of a significant financial loss. For example, a cyber attack against the electricity grid of another country, or perhaps over their water supply.

Maybe even a cyber attack against another Nation's telecommunications bringing that country to a standstill. These are forms of warfare. It is literally an attack against that country.

Yes, an attack against a country through the use of a military grade chemical weapon is a very serious event. It can be deemed to be a casus belli, or an act of war, easily.

There are so many ways to act in a manner that is a casus belli. for instance, if Iran closes down the Straights of Homuz, it would be a casus belli for Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait and possibly the UAE, QATAR and Iraq also.

If Turkey used a military grade chemical weapon to assassinate 2 RoC citizens in Cyprus, then make no mistake about it. Turkey would once again have engaged in a hostile military action against the RoC.

[Paphitis]

And let's be clear. it is 1000% clear that Russia was responsible for the Chemical Attack on Britain.

To say they were not is in fact an insult to everyone's intelligence.

The OPCW has stated very clearly that Russia is responsible.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... -salisbury