The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Boeing 737 MAX+

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Re: Boeing 737 MAX+

Postby Kikapu » Tue Dec 13, 2022 9:24 am

Interesting article with pictures! :D

I have once stayed on the the Queen Mary as a hotel in Long Beach, California. It was an experience! :wink:


Business Insider
I stayed in a Boeing 747 jet converted into a hotel that has beds in the engines and a wheelhouse and it was the coolest place I've ever slept

Taylor Rains
Sun, December 11, 2022, 1:48 PM

https://www.yahoo.com/news/stayed-boein ... 00344.html
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 17971
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Re: Boeing 737 MAX+

Postby Londonrake » Tue Dec 13, 2022 9:37 am

As my Son might say “Kool”. Quite reasonably priced for Sweden, too.

I once stayed under a parachute in a Cheviot hills forest for 5 days during February. It was about -16C some nights. That was my experience claim to fame I guess, and a principal factor in my conversion to becoming a Holiday Inn fan. :D
Londonrake
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5783
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:19 pm
Location: ROC

Re: Boeing 737 MAX+

Postby Londonrake » Tue Dec 13, 2022 9:58 am

Londonrake
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5783
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:19 pm
Location: ROC

Re: Boeing 737 MAX+

Postby Kikapu » Tue Dec 13, 2022 10:37 am

Londonrake wrote:MH370: new evidence.

https://meaww.com/new-evidence-suggests ... r-was-down

.


The MH370 story will become the next Amelia Earhart story I’m afraid, to which the search and theories will just go on and on and on without a definitive answers.

We can at least understand the non conclusion regarding the Amelia Earhart story as it took place about 85 years ago, but it is totally unacceptable for the MH370 story as it only happened about 9 years ago in the modern age Aviation.

My conclusion is that, the MH370 story is deliberately kept as a mystery to the masses, but well known to the select few. :wink:
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 17971
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Re: Boeing 737 MAX+

Postby Londonrake » Tue Dec 13, 2022 10:53 am

Kikapu wrote:
Londonrake wrote:MH370: new evidence.

https://meaww.com/new-evidence-suggests ... r-was-down

.


The MH370 story will become the next Amelia Earhart story I’m afraid, to which the search and theories will just go on and on and on without a definitive answers.

We can at least understand the non conclusion regarding the Amelia Earhart story as it took place about 85 years ago, but it is totally unacceptable for the MH370 story as it only happened about 9 years ago in the modern age Aviation.

My conclusion is that, the MH370 story is deliberately kept as a mystery to the masses, but well known to the select few. :wink:


You mean it’s……………………… a conspiracy? :shock: :D
Londonrake
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5783
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:19 pm
Location: ROC

Re: Boeing 737 MAX+

Postby Kikapu » Tue Dec 13, 2022 11:15 am

Londonrake wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
Londonrake wrote:MH370: new evidence.

https://meaww.com/new-evidence-suggests ... r-was-down

.


The MH370 story will become the next Amelia Earhart story I’m afraid, to which the search and theories will just go on and on and on without a definitive answers.

We can at least understand the non conclusion regarding the Amelia Earhart story as it took place about 85 years ago, but it is totally unacceptable for the MH370 story as it only happened about 9 years ago in the modern age Aviation.

My conclusion is that, the MH370 story is deliberately kept as a mystery to the masses, but well known to the select few. :wink:


You mean it’s……………………… a conspiracy? :shock: :D


Hardly a revelation, no? :wink:
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 17971
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Re: Boeing 737 MAX+

Postby Londonrake » Tue Dec 13, 2022 11:50 am

Kikapu wrote:Hardly a revelation, no? :wink:


I thought it seemed fairly straightforward. No doubt my famous gullibility. :D

But bits of the airframe have been getting washed up on the Madagascar coastline for years. Somebody found an undercarriage door. A (presumably forensic) examination indicated it was open upon impact. So, the aircraft’s gear was down which, coupled with earlier evidence that the flaps weren’t deployed, as they would have been during a controlled ditching, adds weight to the deliberate crash theory. Which I concede is what it is of course.

Dunno. :?

Maybe Paphitis could throw some light? When he’s in Da House. :D :wink:
Londonrake
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5783
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2015 6:19 pm
Location: ROC

Re: Boeing 737 MAX+

Postby Kikapu » Tue Dec 13, 2022 1:19 pm

Londonrake wrote:
Kikapu wrote:Hardly a revelation, no? :wink:


I thought it seemed fairly straightforward. No doubt my famous gullibility. :D

But bits of the airframe have been getting washed up on the Madagascar coastline for years. Somebody found an undercarriage door. A (presumably forensic) examination indicated it was open upon impact. So, the aircraft’s gear was down which, coupled with earlier evidence that the flaps weren’t deployed, as they would have been during a controlled ditching, adds weight to the deliberate crash theory. Which I concede is what it is of course.

Dunno. :?

Maybe Paphitis could throw some light? When he’s in Da House. :D :wink:


Oh, don’t get me wrong.

MH370 is in the water somewhere for sure.

The mystery for the masses is where and how it got there, to which only the select few knows!

Flaps and undercarriage questions are a little significant in the whole scheme of events which took place the night MH370 disappeared.

The fact that part of MH370 always seems to wash up on the shores of Madagascar is a very telling clues where the plane went into the water because of the South Equatorial Currents in the Indian Ocean, and it was not off the Western Coast of Australia as it was claimed and extensively searched not finding anything. If the plane went into the water off Australia, these same currents would have landed some of the plane parts onto the Indonesian coasts before it would ever reach the shores of Madagascar.

I have concluded that the plane went into the water much further north of the Western Australian Coast for the plane pieces to land on the shores of Madagascar. I would say much closer to Diego Garcia!

The mystery for me is, what caused it for it to go into the water?

When the masses were told that the plane went into the waters of the coast of Australia and if it didn’t and if it went down closer to Diego Garcia and only select few knows about it, then the plane went into the water “involuntarily”! :wink:

CASE CLOSED!

39FC580F-9807-4478-AA43-F52F6FA5A90C.jpeg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 17971
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Re: Boeing 737 MAX+

Postby Paphitis » Tue Dec 13, 2022 3:30 pm

Londonrake wrote:
Kikapu wrote:Hardly a revelation, no? :wink:


I thought it seemed fairly straightforward. No doubt my famous gullibility. :D

But bits of the airframe have been getting washed up on the Madagascar coastline for years. Somebody found an undercarriage door. A (presumably forensic) examination indicated it was open upon impact. So, the aircraft’s gear was down which, coupled with earlier evidence that the flaps weren’t deployed, as they would have been during a controlled ditching, adds weight to the deliberate crash theory. Which I concede is what it is of course.

Dunno. :?

Maybe Paphitis could throw some light? When he’s in Da House. :D :wink:


I haven't been keeping taps with the latest, but my own view is that for whatever reason, it was a suicide flight with 1 person still concsious when the aircraft ditched in the water.

passengers and rest of the crew, probably well dead way before impact due to depressurisation of the cabin.

I have heard from a couple of sources that the location of the crash site is known by the Australian Transport safety Board, the Dutch Government and that the Americans placed massive pressure to keep everything under the carpet in order to protect the Malaysian Government and the Malaysian Royal Family. Make of that what you will.

I obviously know as much as everyone else, but that story does seem feasible at least in my view.

Have you ever wondered why Australia never joined Britain in the Falklands War? It's an interesting question. I'd love your take on that one.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Boeing 737 MAX+

Postby Paphitis » Tue Dec 13, 2022 3:49 pm

Kikapu wrote:
Londonrake wrote:
Kikapu wrote:Hardly a revelation, no? :wink:


I thought it seemed fairly straightforward. No doubt my famous gullibility. :D

But bits of the airframe have been getting washed up on the Madagascar coastline for years. Somebody found an undercarriage door. A (presumably forensic) examination indicated it was open upon impact. So, the aircraft’s gear was down which, coupled with earlier evidence that the flaps weren’t deployed, as they would have been during a controlled ditching, adds weight to the deliberate crash theory. Which I concede is what it is of course.

Dunno. :?

Maybe Paphitis could throw some light? When he’s in Da House. :D :wink:


Oh, don’t get me wrong.

MH370 is in the water somewhere for sure.

The mystery for the masses is where and how it got there, to which only the select few knows!

Flaps and undercarriage questions are a little significant in the whole scheme of events which took place the night MH370 disappeared.

The fact that part of MH370 always seems to wash up on the shores of Madagascar is a very telling clues where the plane went into the water because of the South Equatorial Currents in the Indian Ocean, and it was not off the Western Coast of Australia as it was claimed and extensively searched not finding anything. If the plane went into the water off Australia, these same currents would have landed some of the plane parts onto the Indonesian coasts before it would ever reach the shores of Madagascar.

I have concluded that the plane went into the water much further north of the Western Australian Coast for the plane pieces to land on the shores of Madagascar. I would say much closer to Diego Garcia!

The mystery for me is, what caused it for it to go into the water?

When the masses were told that the plane went into the waters of the coast of Australia and if it didn’t and if it went down closer to Diego Garcia and only select few knows about it, then the plane went into the water “involuntarily”! :wink:

CASE CLOSED!

39FC580F-9807-4478-AA43-F52F6FA5A90C.jpeg


It very much so is in the general area the were searching to the South West of Perth and the general flightpath has actually been plotted as well and even the short wave ham radio electromagnetic disturbances from the aircraft itself have been detected and plotted.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests